Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?

Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
34 Posts 9 Posters 716 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Perhaps some indication of the thinking, though not an explanation.

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1736773589733449796.html

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      6-10 don’t seem to be anywhere near a causal chain for the killings. This guy was really set on 10.

      It is ironic that most of the Palestinian deaths have as a “but for” cause at least one war crime committed by Hamas.

      Now we have what might well be the first documented Israeli war crime and the victims are three Israeli hostages.

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Oh, GMAFB.

        It's war. If Grant hadn't been willing to do "terrible things" (those are his words) and Sherman cared not a whit about starving widows and orphans, you'd have at least thirteen less stars on the modern U.S. flag.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
          #12

          Leave your emotions out of it. These are empirical questions.

          I don’t believe there were such things as recognized war crimes in the 1860s, but had the post-WWII regime been in place then, certainly much that was done would have qualified.

          Thank you for your attention to this matter.

          RenaudaR JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
          • CopperC Offline
            CopperC Offline
            Copper
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Yes, watch out, now that the Confederate statues are gone, they'll come after the Union monuments next.

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              Leave your emotions out of it. These are empirical questions.

              I don’t believe there were such things as recognized war crimes in the 1860s, but had the post-WWII regime been in place then, certainly much that was done would have qualified.

              RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              @jon-nyc

              I don’t believe there were such things as recognized war crimes in the 1860s….

              Not until the latter half of the 1890’s was there any notion or consideration given to such.

              Elbows up!

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                Leave your emotions out of it. These are empirical questions.

                I don’t believe there were such things as recognized war crimes in the 1860s, but had the post-WWII regime been in place then, certainly much that was done would have qualified.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by Jolly
                #15

                The Post WW2 construct is mostly fantasy. There are war crimes by the oodles committed every day on the African continent, in the hills of Afghanistan, the edge of the Gobi and pick most any conflict in South America.

                I suspect on any given day in Korea, Vietnam, Chechnya, Nicaragua or countless other wars, somebody does something wrong to somebody else. Sometimes, it's on purpose. Sometimes, it's an accident.

                It's a war.

                Things to know about a war.

                1. It is a violent, dirty business.
                2. The ONLY way to win, is to break your opponent's will to fight or to eradicate your opponent as an entity.
                3. Man is not perfect. Soldiers have emotions, and will do things out of fear and anger. They will also do some very nasty things in the cause of self-preservation. And in revenge.
                4. Shit happens.
                5. He who wins, writes the history books.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  The Post WW2 construct is mostly fantasy. There are war crimes by the oodles committed every day on the African continent, in the hills of Afghanistan, the edge of the Gobi and pick most any conflict in South America.

                  I suspect on any given day in Korea, Vietnam, Chechnya, Nicaragua or countless other wars, somebody does something wrong to somebody else. Sometimes, it's on purpose. Sometimes, it's an accident.

                  It's a war.

                  Things to know about a war.

                  1. It is a violent, dirty business.
                  2. The ONLY way to win, is to break your opponent's will to fight or to eradicate your opponent as an entity.
                  3. Man is not perfect. Soldiers have emotions, and will do things out of fear and anger. They will also do some very nasty things in the cause of self-preservation. And in revenge.
                  4. Shit happens.
                  5. He who wins, writes the history books.
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote on last edited by Renauda
                  #16

                  @Jolly

                  Things to know about a war:

                  Thanks for sharing, but I am confident all the regular posters here are already fully aware of and comprehend the ugly reality of your five points about war.

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    5 doesn’t appear to be true anymore.

                    The Brad

                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      5 doesn’t appear to be true anymore.

                      JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                      5 doesn’t appear to be true anymore.

                      I think it will be eventually. 🤔

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • CopperC Copper

                        Yes, watch out, now that the Confederate statues are gone, they'll come after the Union monuments next.

                        JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        @Copper said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                        Yes, watch out, now that the Confederate statues are gone, they'll come after the Union monuments next.

                        Almost.

                        The statue at the Confederate grave sites in Arlington is being removed.

                        You know, if Union soldiers were still alive today, I don't think that would happen...

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • CopperC Offline
                          CopperC Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Neither Lincoln nor Grant would let it happen.

                          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                          • CopperC Copper

                            Neither Lincoln nor Grant would let it happen.

                            RenaudaR Offline
                            RenaudaR Offline
                            Renauda
                            wrote on last edited by Renauda
                            #21

                            @Copper said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                            Neither Lincoln nor Grant would let it happen.

                            Probably because there were no monuments to Confederate war heroes when they were alive.

                            My understanding is that most were erected during Jim Crow.

                            Elbows up!

                            CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              I was going to post that very point.

                              Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Renauda

                                @Copper said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                Neither Lincoln nor Grant would let it happen.

                                Probably because there were no monuments to Confederate war heroes when they were alive.

                                My understanding is that most were erected during Jim Crow.

                                CopperC Offline
                                CopperC Offline
                                Copper
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                @Renauda said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                Probably because there were a no monuments to Confederate war heroes when they were alive.

                                No, because they were committed to reconciliation.

                                They were much bigger than the trash that surrounds these monuments now.

                                RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                • JollyJ Offline
                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  Jolly
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  In the 1880's, SCOTUS ruled that the U.S. government had illegally confiscated Arlington and remanded it back to the Lee family.

                                  I guess if it were today, they could have had those damnyankees dug up and chunked in the road ditch.

                                  But, in the spirit of reconciliation, they sold Arlington to the government.

                                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • CopperC Copper

                                    @Renauda said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                    Probably because there were a no monuments to Confederate war heroes when they were alive.

                                    No, because they were committed to reconciliation.

                                    They were much bigger than the trash that surrounds these monuments now.

                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                    #25

                                    @Copper said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                    @Renauda said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                    Probably because there were a no monuments to Confederate war heroes when they were alive.

                                    No, because they were committed to reconciliation.

                                    They were much bigger than the trash that surrounds these monuments now.

                                    Glad you agree. But the fact remains neither Lincoln or Grant were alive when the monuments were erected.

                                    Elbows up!

                                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • RenaudaR Renauda

                                      @Copper said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                      @Renauda said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                      Probably because there were a no monuments to Confederate war heroes when they were alive.

                                      No, because they were committed to reconciliation.

                                      They were much bigger than the trash that surrounds these monuments now.

                                      Glad you agree. But the fact remains neither Lincoln or Grant were alive when the monuments were erected.

                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @Renauda said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                      @Copper said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                      @Renauda said in Where’s the thread about the hostage friendly fire deaths?:

                                      Probably because there were a no monuments to Confederate war heroes when they were alive.

                                      No, because they were committed to reconciliation.

                                      They were much bigger than the trash that surrounds these monuments now.

                                      Glad you agree. But the fact remains neither Lincoln or Grant were alive when the monuments were erected.

                                      No, they weren't. But a good many Civil War veterans were still alive in 1914, when the Arlington monument was erected.

                                      I haven't researched it, but I can't recall reading about any grand movement against having the monument.

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • bachophileB Offline
                                        bachophileB Offline
                                        bachophile
                                        wrote on last edited by bachophile
                                        #27

                                        some updated info

                                        about five days before the tragic deaths, the three hostages were in a different building about 1 km away from where they were shot. in that building, their captors were involved in a firefight with an israeli infantry unit. the unit sent in a dog (most units have a canine soldier for sniffing people and or explosives, not attack dogs) and this dog was killed as well as the captors but the building was not physically entered by the infantry. at some point the hostages understood the captors were killed and started moving carefully to see if they could contact israeli forces. there is evidence that they were in at least another building (they left hebrew graffiti on walls and SOS) before finally reaching the last building were they were shot. they wore track suits and bearded, so they looked very local (one was actually an arab who was also kidnapped from one of the kibbutz where he was employed)
                                        after the fact, after they were already killed, the original building was entered to evacuate the corpse of the dog (to give it a military funeral, as is the custom) and on the dog's go pro camera they saw the hostages alive. but this was already after the incident. if they had the camera earlier, they would have maybe understood there were hostages in the vicinity. but the fog of war....information was not available to the other unit.

                                        also it seems there were previous instances of hamas fighters calling out in hebrew from windows to draw in soldiers into a trap, so everyone was on a very tense hair trigger mode.
                                        doesnt excuse the screw up, they should not have been shot, but the shooters are being handled very delicately to try to avoid PTSD as much as possible, they were not taken out of gaza so the message would not be, you screwed up and you are out, they stayed in gaza until their units mission was done and came out today.

                                        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • bachophileB bachophile

                                          some updated info

                                          about five days before the tragic deaths, the three hostages were in a different building about 1 km away from where they were shot. in that building, their captors were involved in a firefight with an israeli infantry unit. the unit sent in a dog (most units have a canine soldier for sniffing people and or explosives, not attack dogs) and this dog was killed as well as the captors but the building was not physically entered by the infantry. at some point the hostages understood the captors were killed and started moving carefully to see if they could contact israeli forces. there is evidence that they were in at least another building (they left hebrew graffiti on walls and SOS) before finally reaching the last building were they were shot. they wore track suits and bearded, so they looked very local (one was actually an arab who was also kidnapped from one of the kibbutz where he was employed)
                                          after the fact, after they were already killed, the original building was entered to evacuate the corpse of the dog (to give it a military funeral, as is the custom) and on the dog's go pro camera they saw the hostages alive. but this was already after the incident. if they had the camera earlier, they would have maybe understood there were hostages in the vicinity. but the fog of war....information was not available to the other unit.

                                          also it seems there were previous instances of hamas fighters calling out in hebrew from windows to draw in soldiers into a trap, so everyone was on a very tense hair trigger mode.
                                          doesnt excuse the screw up, they should not have been shot, but the shooters are being handled very delicately to try to avoid PTSD as much as possible, they were not taken out of gaza so the message would not be, you screwed up and you are out, they stayed in gaza until their units mission was done and came out today.

                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          Renauda
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @bachophile

                                          Thanks for the additional info, bach.

                                          Thanks too for bringing us back to the original topic.

                                          Elbows up!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups