Song Remakes
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 00:52 last edited by
Wow. We just can not at agree on anything.
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 00:54 last edited by
Fine talk from a guy who eats chicken pizza.
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 00:56 last edited by
OK, all of you.
Cats is asking a legit question.
If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.
Well, I guess technically she is not asking a question per se.
Amazing. "Radar Love" is my most favorite song ever. Really. -
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:01 last edited by
Radar Love is the most complete song written and performed during that decade. From the horn section to the bass... Perfection.
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:05 last edited by Catseye3 7 Jul 2020, 01:06
Yeah, but the singing is so flat! Or the singer is trying to convey emotion and just doesn't. At least to me.
That's what is so frustrating. I want to love it, and I would if the vocal was more suited to the sound and the theme.
But what do I know? I am as musically illiterate as you can get.
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:06 last edited by
It's more than perfection, LuFin.
duup-duup-duup-dudu-duup-duup-duup
Need I say more.
(funny, not only red squiggly line under "duup" but DOUBLE red lines!) -
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:35 last edited by
The drums really pulled it together.tight... The only part I could say was a little off were the backing vocals on the chorus with the falsetto vibrato, but even that works in it’s own way.
And when was Springsteen ever acclaimed for being on pitch?
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:44 last edited by Larry 7 Jul 2020, 01:46
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:54 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:55 last edited by
How?
....HOW??????
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 01:58 last edited by
@Larry said in Song Remakes:
How?
....HOW??????
F'ing Injun...
But the original has a "rawness" that the remake lacks. The remake sounds sanitized and just a bit "cleaner." That's not better of course. It just sounds processed. No, dare I say, "soul."
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:06 last edited by
The remake uses the sounds of motorcycles to build tension. And that sound doesn't come in subtle, it stomps on you. In the original the tension builds purely from the bass line, which the player purposely introduces it as if it came in from out of nowhere. You "feel" the driving of the car trying to get where youre going purely from the music, not from engines.
The main flaw in the original in my mind is male background vocals in the chorus. They could have been better. Other than that, a very creative piece of work.
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:07 last edited by
Just listen to the drum break before the bridge. The original tasteful, musical, and even reminiscent of a Gene Krupa. The remake was just trying to show off. Plus no horn section, and no low harmonies on that middle section....
I was going to use the word raw, too. Glad to see you picked up on the same thing.
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:09 last edited by
I know nothing about drumming, but is the way the drummer in the first video holding the drumsticks the normal way. Look at the 25 seconds mark.
It looks weird, and I am not sure why. Almost like he is holding a pencil with his left hand. LOL
-
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:10 last edited by
Hey Larry, are you still in the business?
Do you happen to know how royalties are determined for a cover song? I assume it's whatever it's worth to the cover band, but wonder if there is a percentage involved for how many copies are sold.
But there are no copies, it's all internet. hmmm. I guess that's why I'm asking the question. -
I know nothing about drumming, but is the way the drummer in the first video holding the drumsticks the normal way. Look at the 25 seconds mark.
It looks weird, and I am not sure why. Almost like he is holding a pencil with his left hand. LOL
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:12 last edited by@taiwan_girl that is a normal stick position for snare....
-
@taiwan_girl that is a normal stick position for snare....
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:12 last edited by@LuFins-Dad Thanks!!!!
-
Hey Larry, are you still in the business?
Do you happen to know how royalties are determined for a cover song? I assume it's whatever it's worth to the cover band, but wonder if there is a percentage involved for how many copies are sold.
But there are no copies, it's all internet. hmmm. I guess that's why I'm asking the question.wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:24 last edited by Larry 7 Jul 2020, 02:55@Rainman said in Song Remakes:
Hey Larry, are you still in the business?
Do you happen to know how royalties are determined for a cover song? I assume it's whatever it's worth to the cover band, but wonder if there is a percentage involved for how many copies are sold.
But there are no copies, it's all internet. hmmm. I guess that's why I'm asking the question.I am a little. Mostly I've retired from it. As for the royalties, I never got too involved with that.. but there are several types of royalties involved. Each one would have to be hammered out by 5 or 6 sets of attorneys representing the various interests involved, and that's going to be different in most every situation.
Now - the joke we used to tell the various attornies... why do lawyers wear neckties... so their foreskin won't creep up and choke them to death....
-
Just listen to the drum break before the bridge. The original tasteful, musical, and even reminiscent of a Gene Krupa. The remake was just trying to show off. Plus no horn section, and no low harmonies on that middle section....
I was going to use the word raw, too. Glad to see you picked up on the same thing.
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:27 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Song Remakes:
Just listen to the drum break before the bridge. The original tasteful, musical, and even reminiscent of a Gene Krupa. The remake was just trying to show off. Plus no horn section, and no low harmonies on that middle section....
I was going to use the word raw, too. Glad to see you picked up on the same thing.
I got the feeling that the group Whitesnake didn't even understand the song's storyline, or for that matter, the music.
-
@Larry said in Song Remakes:
How?
....HOW??????
F'ing Injun...
But the original has a "rawness" that the remake lacks. The remake sounds sanitized and just a bit "cleaner." That's not better of course. It just sounds processed. No, dare I say, "soul."
wrote on 7 Jul 2020, 02:31 last edited by@George-K said in Song Remakes:
But the original has a "rawness" that the remake lacks. The remake sounds sanitized and just a bit "cleaner." That's not better of course. It just sounds processed. No, dare I say, "soul."
Okay, that sounds like you're saying what I said. Which rendition are you talking about here?
Sorry for my confusion.