More strange and/or foul reactions
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 00:09 last edited by
Actually he’s living in the 19th century. The ‘80’s rhetoric is just a facade.
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 00:57 last edited by
@George-K said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
"Sorry you were offended."
Yes, what a stupid "apology!"
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 01:01 last edited by
(I have used the "no English" one before!)
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 01:03 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 01:17 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 01:43 last edited by
Yes, two very different Parties.
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 04:26 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 04:40 last edited by bachophile 10 Dec 2023, 04:46
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 10:41 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 11:40 last edited by
I was reading about Rashida Tlaib's non-reaction to the (now verified - Biden's seen pictures, he claims) killed babies. After her weeping at a hearing over children at the border being separated, she had nothing to say when asked about Israel.
Commenting on the Palestinian flag outside her office, Steny Hoyer said, "Well I have a Danish flag in my home and Ukrainian flag on my lapel pin."
Yeah, because those Ukrainian and Danish terrorists are just like the animals in Gaza.
Funny how the outrage over children being abused is not about the children being abused, but situational based on who's doing the abusing.
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 12:44 last edited by
@bachophile said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Thread of fakes
That’s a follow and shared as well. There’s so much crap out there.
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 12:51 last edited by
BTW, the Biden Whitehouse walked back the statement about the dead baby pics.
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 12:56 last edited by
@Jolly said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
BTW, the Biden Whitehouse walked back the statement about the dead baby pics.
Wait. Biden said he SAW the pictures.
Was he lying or senile?
Actually a) and b) are options.
-
@Jolly said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
BTW, the Biden Whitehouse walked back the statement about the dead baby pics.
Wait. Biden said he SAW the pictures.
Was he lying or senile?
Actually a) and b) are options.
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 13:04 last edited by@George-K said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
@Jolly said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
BTW, the Biden Whitehouse walked back the statement about the dead baby pics.
Wait. Biden said he SAW the pictures.
Was he lying or senile?
Actually a) and b) are options.
https://www.businessinsider.com/biden-pictures-terrorists-beheading-children-white-house-2023-10
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 14:22 last edited by
Holy crap, one of my regular follows (and one of @George-K s I believe) has gone batshit crazy.
And too much more…
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 14:23 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 14:28 last edited by
It doesn't seem to be included on the menu of mainstream acceptable reactions to worry about both Israel and Gaza civilian collateral damage. Maybe that worry doesn't admit to an obvious path forward, but the obvious path forward isn't obviously helpful either, beyond revenge.
-
Holy crap, one of my regular follows (and one of @George-K s I believe) has gone batshit crazy.
And too much more…
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 14:44 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Holy crap, one of my regular follows (and one of @George-K s I believe) has gone batshit crazy.
I've seen several of her tweets. Makes me wonder.
-
It doesn't seem to be included on the menu of mainstream acceptable reactions to worry about both Israel and Gaza civilian collateral damage. Maybe that worry doesn't admit to an obvious path forward, but the obvious path forward isn't obviously helpful either, beyond revenge.
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 14:58 last edited by@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
It doesn't seem to be included on the menu of mainstream acceptable reactions to worry about both Israel and Gaza civilian collateral damage. Maybe that worry doesn't admit to an obvious path forward, but the obvious path forward isn't obviously helpful either, beyond revenge.
The problem is the way Hamas uses the civilians as shields, building and installing missile batteries in hospitals, schools, apartment buildings, etc… So does Israel blow up those installations knowing that innocent civilians may get injured or killed? Or do they allow those batteries to continue to fire on Israeli innocents?
Their roof knocking approach is (IMO) a remarkably reserved approach. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roof_knocking And the most humanitarian way of dealing with it that I can think of.
There has been a lot of confusion over the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. A lot of misinformation on both sides and a lot of evil acts on both sides. But at the end of the day, you have one side that sends non explosive shells to warn civilians of what’s coming next, and in the other you have a side that is filming themselves raping dead teenage girls and posting it on Social Media. You have a side that purposefully cut infants throats.
No, there is a tumor on humanity that needs to be excised. It’s horrible that there is healthy tissue around that tumor that will need to be excised, and there is still a good chance that the tumor will return, but I don’t see a reasonable alternative, but will still gladly listen to suggestions.
-
wrote on 12 Oct 2023, 15:02 last edited by Renauda 10 Dec 2023, 15:09
Until Hamas releases the hostages or unconditionally surrenders, whichever comes first, I am not at all concerned about collateral damage to civilians residing Gaza.
Elbows up!
