Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact

Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
29 Posts 8 Posters 129 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Mik

    Was that a Biden proposal? If not, it did not belong in the article.

    AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    @Mik said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

    Was that a Biden proposal? If not, it did not belong in the article.

    The article is not a “straight fact” reporting, it has an op-ed component. Towards the end the article mentions other things that are not part of Biden’s proposal (e.g., raising the Social Security tax rate, raising retirement age, means-testing for benefits). I was pointing out that the article missed the possibility of taxing other incomes other than “earned income.”

    1 Reply Last reply
    • LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
      #6

      Reinstate the payroll tax on earned income above $400,000: In 2023, all earned income (wages and salary but not investment income) between $0.01 and $160,200 is subject to the 12.4% payroll tax,

      Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

      Switch the inflationary tether from the CPI-W to the CPI-E::

      There is no guarantee that CPI-E is higher than CPI-W. Instead, tie it to the higher of the two.

      The Brad

      JollyJ MikM 2 Replies Last reply
      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

        Reinstate the payroll tax on earned income above $400,000: In 2023, all earned income (wages and salary but not investment income) between $0.01 and $160,200 is subject to the 12.4% payroll tax,

        Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

        Switch the inflationary tether from the CPI-W to the CPI-E::

        There is no guarantee that CPI-E is higher than CPI-W. Instead, tie it to the higher of the two.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

        And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

        Dunno. It's probably that, or a means test. With the latter, an individual might get cut all the way down to $0.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

          Reinstate the payroll tax on earned income above $400,000: In 2023, all earned income (wages and salary but not investment income) between $0.01 and $160,200 is subject to the 12.4% payroll tax,

          Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

          Switch the inflationary tether from the CPI-W to the CPI-E::

          There is no guarantee that CPI-E is higher than CPI-W. Instead, tie it to the higher of the two.

          MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

          Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

          That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
          • LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Increase the special minimum benefit: For lifetime low-earning workers with at least 30 years of coverage, the maximum benefit in 2023 is a mere $1,033.50 per month. That's well below the federal poverty rate for a single individual of $1,215 per month. President Biden proposes raising the special minimum benefit to 125% of the federal poverty level.

            No real problem with that. Except that a lot of this is so region specific. Even $1500 in this area is untenable. I can probably get buy on $1500 in western PA pretty well…

            The Brad

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
              #10

              The donut hole is unconscionable. A gift to the core democratic voting block of the mass-affluent.

              "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
              -Cormac McCarthy

              MikM 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                The donut hole is unconscionable. A gift to the core democratic voting block of the mass-affluent.

                MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                @jon-nyc said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                The donut hole is unconscionable. A gift to the core democratic voting block of the mass-affluent.

                Agreed.

                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Yes. The rich who should be taxed are of course people with more than oneself.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Mik

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                      Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                      That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      @Mik said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                      Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                      That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

                      @Mik said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                      Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                      That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

                      I’d like to see the numbers… but nobody should be putting in more than they will be getting back later…

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Horace

                        One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                        #15

                        @Horace said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                        One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                        Who knows. I understand their motivation, they don’t want to (visibly) raise taxes on anyone making under 400k. But the effect given that the cutoff is there already is obscene.

                        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                        -Cormac McCarthy

                        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Wait, did it pass? I didn’t see that…

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            @Horace said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                            One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                            Who knows. I understand their motivation, they don’t want to (visibly) raise taxes on anyone making under 400k. But the effect given that the cutoff is there already is obscene.

                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            @jon-nyc said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                            @Horace said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                            One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                            Who knows. I understand their motivation, they don’t want to (visibly) raise taxes on anyone making under 400k. But the effect given that the cutoff is there already is obscene.

                            Why $400K? 3 years ago it was the $250K group that were evil…

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • MikM Offline
                              MikM Offline
                              Mik
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              Because he promised over and over that no one making $400K or less would see a single dollar in increased taxes.

                              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Doctor PhibesD Online
                                Doctor PhibesD Online
                                Doctor Phibes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                I was only joking

                                HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                                • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                  Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                  HoraceH Offline
                                  HoraceH Offline
                                  Horace
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                  Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                  It's the part of the donut they cut out, making a small round donut. They are typically sold by the dozen at donut shops.

                                  Education is extremely important.

                                  RainmanR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                    #21

                                    So today social security tax is only paid on your first 160k or so of income (too lazy to Google).

                                    So you pay 6% (between you and your employer) of the wages up to that number and nothing after.

                                    There have been proposals over the year to remove the cap so everyone would pay the 6% on their entire income.

                                    This proposal would reintroduce the tax only on marginal income over 400k.

                                    The the result would be that people making between 160-400 essentially have an exemption from a marginal tax that those above and below have to pay.

                                    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                                    -Cormac McCarthy

                                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • MikM Offline
                                      MikM Offline
                                      Mik
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      I could see a reduced rate past a certain point, especially if they want to keep the maximum benefit lower.

                                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                        So today social security tax is only paid on your first 160k or so of income (too lazy to Google).

                                        So you pay 6% (between you and your employer) of the wages up to that number and nothing after.

                                        There have been proposals over the year to remove the cap so everyone would pay the 6% on their entire income.

                                        This proposal would reintroduce the tax only on marginal income over 400k.

                                        The the result would be that people making between 160-400 essentially have an exemption from a marginal tax that those above and below have to pay.

                                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @jon-nyc said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                        So today social security tax is only paid on your first 160k or so of income (too lazy to Google).

                                        So you pay 6% (between you and your employer) of the wages up to that number and nothing after.

                                        There have been proposals over the year to remove the cap so everyone would pay the 6% on their entire income.

                                        This proposal would reintroduce the tax only on marginal income over 400k.

                                        The the result would be that people making between 160-400 essentially have an exemption from a marginal tax that those above and below have to pay.

                                        Ok thanks. That seems kind of cynical

                                        I was only joking

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • HoraceH Horace

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                          Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                          It's the part of the donut they cut out, making a small round donut. They are typically sold by the dozen at donut shops.

                                          RainmanR Offline
                                          RainmanR Offline
                                          Rainman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @Horace said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                          Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                          It's the part of the donut they cut out, making a small round donut. They are typically sold by the dozen at donut shops.

                                          Baker's dozen, or senility? I can't tell which I suffer, I just chomp away. Anyway, I'm glad SOME nice person answered Phibe's question.

                                          HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups