Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact

Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
29 Posts 8 Posters 129 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Offline
    MikM Offline
    Mik
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Worth the read.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/personalfinance/joe-biden-s-proposed-social-security-changes-come-with-unintended-consequences-for-the-u-s-economy/ar-AA1fNHAS?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=d8cf16eb0a034df1b115adc4201f0833&ei=69

    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

    1 Reply Last reply
    • AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Still limited to earned income.
      That being a Motley Fool article, it won’t mention the possibility of imposing Social Security/Medicare taxes to investment incomes.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Was that a Biden proposal? If not, it did not belong in the article.

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I'm subject to WEP, so you all can go get screwed.

          But...Some modest proposals...

          1. No donut hole. You pay payroll tax on every dime of earned income. Make $1M a year? Then pony up your
            $124,000. You make $$10,000 a year? Pony up your $1240. benefits will be capped at a reasonable (middle-class reasonable) amount.
          2. Encourage citizens to have children. The right kind of children. Children from two-parent households. Create a huge income tax break within the system for married couples who have or who adopt children. Not single moms. Not cohabitating singles. Married people, period. And if I had my way, heterosexual married couples.
          3. Raise the FRA. But...Just because somebody hasn't reached their FRA, they should have continued access to Medicare at 65. Especially Medicare Advantage plans.
          4. Selective immigration. Hordes of new taxpayers are not the answer, if most of them are working in lower paying jobs. Shut the border, now. Make immigration paperwork easier, especially for people with desired skills under the age of 35, or people who are bringing enough capital into the country with the express purpose of starting a business.
          5. Jobs. A lot of our problem's roots are found in a shrinking middle income class and a rise in the gibmedats. I heard Senator Scott say the other day that his mother worked 16 hours a day, many days, to put food on her table and clothes on their backs. He believes their is worth in work and important life lessons to be learned on a job. I agree. The current administration, and in fact many politicians, like the votes that money can buy. Time to stop the gravy train.

          Provide opportunity, but government needs to get out of the quota and equity business. Turn all the little pigs loose at the trough, and may the best pigs win.

          1. Trust-busting. I think this goes hand-in-hand with job creation and competition. There are some companies in the U.S. today, that are simply too big or control too much of a sector through predatory business practices. Time for more entrepreneurship, smaller companies and more nimble business solutions. I think this atmosphere and opportunity creates more middle class jobs, which is what is needed.

          2. Investment. Allow people, if they wish, to allocate a small percentage of the Social Security tax to private investment options. When I say small, I'm talking 1%-1.5% of earned income. The investments would cover best-of-breed mutual funds, spanning everything from index funds, narrow sector funds, bonds and REI's. Let's do a trial run for a couple of decades and then evaluate how well this works.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Mik

            Was that a Biden proposal? If not, it did not belong in the article.

            AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @Mik said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

            Was that a Biden proposal? If not, it did not belong in the article.

            The article is not a “straight fact” reporting, it has an op-ed component. Towards the end the article mentions other things that are not part of Biden’s proposal (e.g., raising the Social Security tax rate, raising retirement age, means-testing for benefits). I was pointing out that the article missed the possibility of taxing other incomes other than “earned income.”

            1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
              #6

              Reinstate the payroll tax on earned income above $400,000: In 2023, all earned income (wages and salary but not investment income) between $0.01 and $160,200 is subject to the 12.4% payroll tax,

              Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

              Switch the inflationary tether from the CPI-W to the CPI-E::

              There is no guarantee that CPI-E is higher than CPI-W. Instead, tie it to the higher of the two.

              The Brad

              JollyJ MikM 2 Replies Last reply
              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                Reinstate the payroll tax on earned income above $400,000: In 2023, all earned income (wages and salary but not investment income) between $0.01 and $160,200 is subject to the 12.4% payroll tax,

                Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                Switch the inflationary tether from the CPI-W to the CPI-E::

                There is no guarantee that CPI-E is higher than CPI-W. Instead, tie it to the higher of the two.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                Dunno. It's probably that, or a means test. With the latter, an individual might get cut all the way down to $0.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  Reinstate the payroll tax on earned income above $400,000: In 2023, all earned income (wages and salary but not investment income) between $0.01 and $160,200 is subject to the 12.4% payroll tax,

                  Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                  Switch the inflationary tether from the CPI-W to the CPI-E::

                  There is no guarantee that CPI-E is higher than CPI-W. Instead, tie it to the higher of the two.

                  MikM Offline
                  MikM Offline
                  Mik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                  Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                  That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Increase the special minimum benefit: For lifetime low-earning workers with at least 30 years of coverage, the maximum benefit in 2023 is a mere $1,033.50 per month. That's well below the federal poverty rate for a single individual of $1,215 per month. President Biden proposes raising the special minimum benefit to 125% of the federal poverty level.

                    No real problem with that. Except that a lot of this is so region specific. Even $1500 in this area is untenable. I can probably get buy on $1500 in western PA pretty well…

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                      #10

                      The donut hole is unconscionable. A gift to the core democratic voting block of the mass-affluent.

                      "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                      -Cormac McCarthy

                      MikM 1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        The donut hole is unconscionable. A gift to the core democratic voting block of the mass-affluent.

                        MikM Offline
                        MikM Offline
                        Mik
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @jon-nyc said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                        The donut hole is unconscionable. A gift to the core democratic voting block of the mass-affluent.

                        Agreed.

                        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • HoraceH Offline
                          HoraceH Offline
                          Horace
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                          Education is extremely important.

                          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          • MikM Offline
                            MikM Offline
                            Mik
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Yes. The rich who should be taxed are of course people with more than oneself.

                            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • MikM Mik

                              @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                              Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                              That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @Mik said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                              @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                              Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                              That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

                              @Mik said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                              @LuFins-Dad said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                              Stupid. No donut hole. And you also need to stop limiting the upper end on returns. If you put in, you get back. Period.

                              That would rather defeat the purpose of the increase.

                              I’d like to see the numbers… but nobody should be putting in more than they will be getting back later…

                              The Brad

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • HoraceH Horace

                                One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                #15

                                @Horace said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                                Who knows. I understand their motivation, they don’t want to (visibly) raise taxes on anyone making under 400k. But the effect given that the cutoff is there already is obscene.

                                "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                                -Cormac McCarthy

                                LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                • LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Wait, did it pass? I didn’t see that…

                                  The Brad

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                    @Horace said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                    One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                                    Who knows. I understand their motivation, they don’t want to (visibly) raise taxes on anyone making under 400k. But the effect given that the cutoff is there already is obscene.

                                    LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins Dad
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @jon-nyc said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                    @Horace said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                    One wonders if it would have passed otherwise.

                                    Who knows. I understand their motivation, they don’t want to (visibly) raise taxes on anyone making under 400k. But the effect given that the cutoff is there already is obscene.

                                    Why $400K? 3 years ago it was the $250K group that were evil…

                                    The Brad

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • MikM Offline
                                      MikM Offline
                                      Mik
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Because he promised over and over that no one making $400K or less would see a single dollar in increased taxes.

                                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • Doctor PhibesD Online
                                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                        I was only joking

                                        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                          Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                          HoraceH Offline
                                          HoraceH Offline
                                          Horace
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Biden's proposed Social Security Changes and their impact:

                                          Excuse my ignorance, but what is the donut hole? It's not a term I'm familiar with.

                                          It's the part of the donut they cut out, making a small round donut. They are typically sold by the dozen at donut shops.

                                          Education is extremely important.

                                          RainmanR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups