Grassley releases the 1023
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2023, 20:29 last edited by George K
According to an unidentified informant businessman, the founder of Burisma recounted being pressured by then-Vice President Joe Biden to put Biden’s son Hunter on the Ukrainian energy company’s board, and for $10 million in bribes — $5 million each to Joe and Hunter Biden — in order to use Biden’s political influence to force the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma.
The prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, was fired by the Ukrainian government a few months after Vice President Biden, in late 2015, threatened then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko that the Obama administration would withhold $1 billion in congressionally approved U.S. funding unless Kyiv fired Shokin. Biden later bragged about the threat in a 2018 interview at the Council on Foreign Relations.
The bribery information was provided to the FBI in a series of meetings with the informant beginning in 2017. Those meetings were summarized in re-interview of the informant on June 30, 2020, and outlined in a Form 1023, the standard FBI form used to record information from an interview with a confidential human source (CHS). As National Review previously reported, this 1023 report has been the subject of an extensive dispute between the House Oversight Committee, which subpoenaed the document, and the FBI, which fought its release and then made a redacted version of the document available to the committee with significant restrictions.
The 1023 report was released Thursday afternoon with minimal redactions by Senator Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa), who explains that he obtained the document via legally protected disclosures by Justice Department whistleblowers. Indeed, the senator has previously explained that it was through whistleblower agents that he learned of the existence of the document.
Senator Grassley and the House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer, have been pressing the FBI for an explanation of what, if any, follow-up investigation has been done regarding extensively detailed disclosures that implicate now-President Biden in a $10 million bribery scheme (among other corrupt acts) from a CHS with a track-record of reliability. Thus far, the FBI and its Justice Department superiors have declined to respond to those inquiries.
Burisma’s founder and CEO is Mykola Zlochevsky. The CHS, a businessman, first dealt with him indirectly in the 2015-16 time frame. The CHS was introduced to Burisma executives by an associate, identified as Oleksandr Ostapenko, who accompanied the CHS to a meeting at Burisma headquarters to discuss the company’s acquisition of an American energy firm that would allow them to IPO in the U.S.
During the meeting, Burisma CFO Vadim Pojarskii listed the company’s board of directors, which included the former president and prime minister of Poland as well as Hunter Biden who, he said, was brought on “to protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.”
The CHS then asked why Burisma needed his assistance with the acquisition of a U.S. energy company given Hunter Biden’s involvement, prompting Pojarskii to concede that the younger Biden’s limited intelligence meant he was of little value outside of the influence he could exercise over his father.
It has previously been reported that Hunter Biden’s laptop stored emails from Pojarskii (sometimes spelled Pozharskyi) explicitly discussing the understanding that Hunter would “use your influence” to assist Burisma, including in arranging for U.S. government officials to help Zlochevsky’s company fend off Ukrainian government pressure.
At a subsequent meeting two months later, the CHS expressed concern that Shokin’s investigation of Burisma would damage the company’s prospective IPO in the U.S. Zlochevsky, the Burisma CEO, replied something to the effect of, “don’t worry Hunter will take care of all of those Issues through his dad.” He allegedly went on to say that he had paid $5 million each to Hunter and Joe Biden, an admission the CHS said was not at all unusual in Eastern European circles, where businessman enjoy bragging about their influence.
“Zlochevsky made some comment that although Hunter Biden ‘was stupid, and his (Zlochevsky’s) dog was smarter,’ Zlochevsky needed to keep Hunter Biden (on Burisma’s board) ‘so everything will be okay,’” the document reads.
In a subsequent phone call that occurred shortly after the 2016 election, Zlochevsky expressed disappointment that President Trump had been elected and said that he had never wanted to pay off the Bidens but was “pushed to pay” them, even using the Russian term “poluchili,” a slang term often employed by criminals to describe being forced to pay a bribe.
The CHS told the bureau that Zlochevsky claimed to have a total of 17 recordings implicating the Bidens in the bribery scheme, two of which involved Joe directly.
The CHS also recalled a 2019 phone call in which he mentioned that Zlochevsky might have difficulty explaining suspicious wire transfers that could prove illicit payments to the Bidens. Zlochevsky, he said, responded that he did not send funds directly to “the big guy” (a reference to Joe Biden), and that the payments to the Bidens had been routed through so many companies and bank accounts that it would take investigators ten years to trace the payments to Joe Biden.
The Oversight Committee’s ongoing probe indicates, mainly through bank records, that millions of dollars from foreign actors in Ukraine and other countries were transferred to at least nine different family members, through a dizzying array of shell companies and LLCs that were established mainly by Hunter Biden while his father was the Obama administration vice president. An interim report released by the Committee in May said that, although the investigation and review of bank records is far from complete, over $10 million was transferred from foreign actors to Biden family members, beginning when Joe Biden was vice president and continuing after he left public office in 2017.
While President Biden has repeatedly claimed to have no involvement in his son’s business dealings, he did meet with Hunter’s business partner Devon Archer in 2014, around the time they both joined the Burisma board, according to Obama White House visitor logs. The elder Biden also met with Pojarskii, the Burisma CFO, at Cafe Milano in Washington, D.C., in 2015, the New York Post reported.
Son of a bitch, they fired him...
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2023, 20:34 last edited by Jolly
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2023, 21:07 last edited by George K
@Jolly said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
Well, if you look at the press coverage of yesterday's hearings, you'd think that nothing happened.
Hay, WaPo! Where does democracy die again?
-
wrote on 20 Jul 2023, 21:14 last edited by
@Jolly said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
When the other side is an existential threat, yes. We have reached the point where the favored side can literally do no wrong. That’s the simplified beauty of existential threats. Nobody has to think anymore, if they’re in the business of avoiding them.
-
@Jolly said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
Well, if you look at the press coverage of yesterday's hearings, you'd think that nothing happened.
Hay, WaPo! Where does democracy die again?
wrote on 20 Jul 2023, 23:49 last edited by@George-K said in Grassley releases the 1023:
@Jolly said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
Well, if you look at the press coverage of yesterday's hearings, you'd think that nothing happened.
Hay, WaPo! Where does democracy die again?
When you purposely omit one of the biggest stories of the day from the front page, shouldn't the name be changed to Pravda or something?
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 11:03 last edited by
For WaPo Democracy Dying in Darkness is a feature, not a bug.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 11:41 last edited by George K
You'd think that a story alleging bribery, extortion, money laundering and a protection racket involving the then-vice president and current POTUS would merit a mention on the front page of the paper of Woodward and Bernstein, wouldn't you?
Nope...
What gets the front page of WaPo?
Football
Abortion
Soccer - women's soccer, of course
Clarence Thomas
(of course) Trump
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 11:47 last edited by
One would think so, yes.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:34 last edited by
@Jolly said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
If we had evidence of actual bribery, sure. What we have are reports of an Eastern European businessman bragging that he bribed a powerful person.
If there’s a there there I assume Weiss will find it.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:38 last edited by
Kinda like investigating a bag of coke in the Whitehouse, eh?
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:38 last edited by
My guess is that there won't be a signed receipt for Biden exerting some influence in return for a W-2 income from the eastern europeans.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:39 last edited by
Evidence of payment should be traceable.
-
@Jolly said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
If we had evidence of actual bribery, sure. What we have are reports of an Eastern European businessman bragging that he bribed a powerful person.
If there’s a there there I assume Weiss will find it.
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:44 last edited by -
@Jolly said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Have we reached the point where outright bribery generates no outrage?
If we had evidence of actual bribery, sure. What we have are reports of an Eastern European businessman bragging that he bribed a powerful person.
If there’s a there there I assume Weiss will find it.
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:45 last edited by@Jon said in Grassley releases the 1023:
What we have are reports of an Eastern European businessman bragging that he bribed a powerful person.
The businessman said this to a FBI CHS who has a long-standing relationship with the bureau.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:52 last edited by
Not sure what the significance of that is. It’s still a guy bragging.
If Joe took money it should be traceable.
-
Not sure what the significance of that is. It’s still a guy bragging.
If Joe took money it should be traceable.
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 13:54 last edited by@Jon said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Not sure what the significance of that is. It’s still a guy bragging.
A similar story (Steele) had fantastic significance in 2016.
And, son of a bitch, the bragging guy is Biden, if you recall.
-
@Jon said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Not sure what the significance of that is. It’s still a guy bragging.
A similar story (Steele) had fantastic significance in 2016.
And, son of a bitch, the bragging guy is Biden, if you recall.
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 14:43 last edited by@George-K said in Grassley releases the 1023:
A similar story (Steele) had fantastic significance in 2016.
CNN's story on the Steele dossier.
Spot the difference.
-
wrote on 21 Jul 2023, 16:34 last edited by
@Jon said in Grassley releases the 1023:
Evidence of payment should be traceable.
But he has a right to privacy, as affirmed by Roe v. Wade.