Intent to deceive?
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 13:05 last edited by
Or just bureaucratic bungling?
-
Or just bureaucratic bungling?
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 13:45 last edited by@Jolly said in Intent to deceive?:
Or just bureaucratic bungling?
If the next pandemic hits within 10 years, we are screwed. The loss of faith and trust in our public health officials is profound.
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 13:49 last edited by Horace 7 Sept 2023, 13:56
I'm happy with decision making weighted towards personal liberty, and away from authoritarian, panic-driven, power-grabbing, tribalized, imposed faux-scientific consensus.
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 13:55 last edited by Horace 7 Sept 2023, 13:58
Glenn Loury recently spoke to an epidemiologist and so-called Covid dissenter about his first hand account of the power-grab and faux science involved in our response.
Link to video -
@Jolly said in Intent to deceive?:
Or just bureaucratic bungling?
If the next pandemic hits within 10 years, we are screwed. The loss of faith and trust in our public health officials is profound.
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 18:27 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Intent to deceive?:
@Jolly said in Intent to deceive?:
Or just bureaucratic bungling?
If the next pandemic hits within 10 years, we are screwed. The loss of faith and trust in our public health officials is profound.
Yep.
And the further this goes, the worse some people like Fauxi look. I hope the fleeting glory and respect was worth it.
-
@Jolly said in Intent to deceive?:
Or just bureaucratic bungling?
If the next pandemic hits within 10 years, we are screwed. The loss of faith and trust in our public health officials is profound.
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 20:16 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Intent to deceive?:
If the next pandemic hits within 10 years, we are screwed. The loss of faith and trust in our public health officials is profound.
Nah, I still think our public health officials mostly did quite well on the whole, except the anti-vax, anti-mask, anti-social distancing lot which makes up the minority among public health officials.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Intent to deceive?:
If the next pandemic hits within 10 years, we are screwed. The loss of faith and trust in our public health officials is profound.
Nah, I still think our public health officials mostly did quite well on the whole, except the anti-vax, anti-mask, anti-social distancing lot which makes up the minority among public health officials.
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 20:48 last edited by@Axtremus said in Intent to deceive?:
@LuFins-Dad said in Intent to deceive?:
If the next pandemic hits within 10 years, we are screwed. The loss of faith and trust in our public health officials is profound.
Nah, I still think our public health officials mostly did quite well on the whole, except the anti-vax, anti-mask, anti-social distancing lot which makes up the minority among public health officials.
Your opinion vs facts…
Seven states refused to shutdown or issue stay at home orders - Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Arkansas age adjusted COVID Mortality was 385 (per 100,000). Ohio (one of the states lauded for their early intervention and shutdown) was at 380. Iowa - 298, Nebraska - 272, North and South Dakota were at 377 and 369. Utah was 231.
Their numbers were consistent with other states that did button up tight. There were no indications that their policies posed a higher threat or risk…
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2023, 21:34 last edited by
Problem is, the CDC knew this in the first few months of data ...Yet, still promoted policies they knew weren't effective.