Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump to be indicted - again.

Trump to be indicted - again.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
191 Posts 17 Posters 4.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LuFins DadL Offline
    LuFins DadL Offline
    LuFins Dad
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    It comes down to public trust in the mechanisms of government. The public must be able to trust that it is operating effectively, openly, and in a dispassionate and nonpolitical manner. Any breach of that trust, even if it seems innocent, has to be treated without compromise. The Comey/HRC investigation was/is the tip of the iceberg. Then you had everything that has come out over the last three years regarding the FBI, FISA Warrants, and Michael Steele. You have illegal FBI stings involving Whitmer and the ridiculous white nationalist stuff. It’s eroded the trust. We see what happened to General Flynn. We see what happened with many Trump officials and the manner of their arrests -and we see the disproportionate standards of justice being applied, and we have no trust that this is being handled correctly and properly. How could we?

    This isn’t about the case right now, but the past 7 years. The public trust is gone. Hell, I bet there are people on the left that see it to, but are choosing to ignore it since it’s attacking those evil conservatives, then it’s justified.

    I can and do honestly believe that Trump violated the law. I can and do believe that he should likely go to jail. But after the last 7 years I cannot trust that, or those responsible to uphold these laws.

    The Brad

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #58

      A large portion of the country thinks the Russia hoax was a political act. The prosecution of Manafort under the Logan Act, while Kerry scampered the globe breaking the Act repeatedly. The process crime of Flynn, based on a criminal act that never existed. A good many feel that the 2020 election was rigged, either through overt actions such as ballot harvesting and lack of voter ID or through covert actions such as miscounting, ballot stuffing or computer manipulation. Many remember the FBI raiding an old man's house in the wee hours of the morning, while CNN cameras took in all the action. A lot of people look at the total inaction of the DOJ concerning the BLM riots and look at the resources committed to investigating Jan 6, and the zeal of federal prosecutors to lock up people for years over trespassing and interference with an official proceeding.

      And a lot of people remember the two impeachment trials of Trump. Pure politics, one based on a pure lie and the other based on something that happens continually in politics. Something that Biden had done overtly when VP, and then bragged about. Pure political theater, orchestrated by The Swamp.

      A lot of people still shake their heads at the raid at Trump's residence, while Biden has classified documents sitting in a garage, or in a warehouse or in a papers collection somewhere else.

      Not to mention a political prosecution in NYC, that is based upon the flimsiest of evidence. Charges that would never have been brought if the defendant's name was not Trump.

      Now somebody tell me, when the public has seen how Obama, Hillary Clinton and Biden have been treated by The Swamp, that a significant portion does not believe in The Deep State, the political weaponization of the FBI and the Justice Department, and unequal treatment under the law based on political affiliation?

      You'd have to be a political partisan or fucking nuts not to see what is happening.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #59

        The National Archives weighs in on the Presidential Records Act:

        https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr23-016

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          The National Archives weighs in on the Presidential Records Act:

          https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr23-016

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #60

          @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

          The National Archives weighs in on the Presidential Records Act:

          https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr23-016

          The Swamp speaks...

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Away
            MikM Away
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #61

            The Dersh weighs in. His take: for this to stand it needs to be a very, very strong case. But it looks weak, especially in light of other potential violations that have gone unindicted.

            https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/alan-dershowitz-the-doj-just-opened-pandora-s-box/ar-AA1cmc6s?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=ad214c9387b64e148e54ac8006fd60ad&ei=22

            “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #62

              Paul Sperry:

              Sources say Special Counsel Smith does not actually have the supposed "smoking gun" doc Trump is heard on an audio talking about, which means he cannot prove it is classified and thus prove Trump knew it was classified. Prosecutors have no real evidence to show jurors.

              Special Counsel Smith's indictment alleges Trump showed off a military paper that he boasted was classified "highly confidential" and "secret," but the transcript reveals Trump actually said: "like, highly confidential" and "a secret." Smith omitted the words "like" and "a."

              =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

              If true, it makes the legal case more difficult for the DOJ.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by Jolly
                #63

                They don't want to convict him. They just want to keep him out of the White House.

                Fear.

                FEAR.

                FEAR!

                As I've written, to give this debacle a smidgen of fig leaf, Hunter will be indicted soon. It only took how many years?

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  They don't want to convict him. They just want to keep him out of the White House.

                  Fear.

                  FEAR.

                  FEAR!

                  As I've written, to give this debacle a smidgen of fig leaf, Hunter will be indicted soon. It only took how many years?

                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #64

                  @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                  They don't want to convict him. They just want to keep him out of the White House.

                  Fear.

                  FEAR.

                  FEAR!

                  As I've written, to give this debacle a smidgen of fig leaf, Hunter will be indicted soon. It only took how many years?

                  I disagree. They want him to win the nomination.

                  The Brad

                  AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                    The National Archives weighs in on the Presidential Records Act:

                    https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr23-016

                    The Swamp speaks...

                    taiwan_girlT Online
                    taiwan_girlT Online
                    taiwan_girl
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #65

                    @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                    @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                    The National Archives weighs in on the Presidential Records Act:

                    https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr23-016

                    The Swamp speaks...

                    ??? Are you saying that the National Archive is part of this so-called "swamp"?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JonJ Jon

                      That’s a lot of sleight of hand on McCarthys part. Note he used the passive voice in Hillary’s case “documents were destroyed”.

                      George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #66

                      @Jon said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                      That’s a lot of sleight of hand on McCarthys part

                      Today he addresses what I think @Jon was talking about:


                      Is the former president being unfairly singled out for prosecution by special counsel Jack Smith’s 37-count indictment? I think so . . . but not for the reasons Trump and his devotees posit.

                      The problem is not that Democrats, who are leveraging the government’s law-enforcement power for partisan advantage, are going after him, even though Democrats and Beltway big shots — Hillary Clinton, Sandy Berger, David Petraeus, and (soon) Joe Biden — get a pass. The problem is that Clinton, Berger, Petraeus, and (soon) Biden get a pass.

                      It’s not that Trump is owed a pass. It’s that every official who is entrusted with access to the nation’s secrets, and who then betrays that trust by willful law violations and cover-ups, should be prosecuted. Every . . . single . . . one.

                      And none of them has any business near power.

                      The lesson of the Hillary Clinton precedent is that Joe Biden should be investigated and prosecuted. That’s how the scales of justice are evened out. The fix for a two-tiered justice system is not equal injustice under the law.

                      As for Trump, say what you want about Democrats being out to destroy him. I know all about that — wrote a book about it, in fact. But if Trump ends up being destroyed in this case, it will be based on the accounts of people who had his best interests at heart.

                      I don’t believe that Trump’s lawyers, who were trying to help him, would testify — as they have very reluctantly testified — that he tried to get them to destroy evidence and obstruct justice, unless he really did try to get them to destroy evidence and obstruct justice.

                      If you tell me I need to look the other way on that because Hillary Clinton got a pass, I respectfully suggest that you’ve lost your way.

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                        @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                        They don't want to convict him. They just want to keep him out of the White House.

                        Fear.

                        FEAR.

                        FEAR!

                        As I've written, to give this debacle a smidgen of fig leaf, Hunter will be indicted soon. It only took how many years?

                        I disagree. They want him to win the nomination.

                        AxtremusA Away
                        AxtremusA Away
                        Axtremus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #67

                        @LuFins-Dad said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                        @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                        They don't want to convict him. They just want to keep him out of the White House.

                        ...

                        I disagree. They want him to win the nomination.

                        You're both wrong. They are mere dutiful public servants doing their jobs enforcing the law.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #68

                          There are two Trump loyalists that I personally know that have had it with Trump over this indictment. Both are retired military pilots (one AF, the other a Marine) and both worked for years at the Pentagon. Both had extremely high security clearances and feel this was a drastic failure on Trump’s part. They would both strongly agree with McCarthy. One is now starting to look into DeSantis…

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG Offline
                            George KG Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #69

                            Turley: "Many are celebrating what the Drudge Report suggested was “the downfall of the Don.” However, destroying Trump in a scandal is like trying to drown a manatee: Both are in their element."

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            MikM 1 Reply Last reply
                            • George KG George K

                              Turley: "Many are celebrating what the Drudge Report suggested was “the downfall of the Don.” However, destroying Trump in a scandal is like trying to drown a manatee: Both are in their element."

                              MikM Away
                              MikM Away
                              Mik
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #70

                              @George-K he does have a remarkable resilience.

                              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                              George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                              • MikM Mik

                                @George-K he does have a remarkable resilience.

                                George KG Offline
                                George KG Offline
                                George K
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #71

                                @Mik said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                @George-K he does have a remarkable resilience.

                                How did you get @Jon's password?

                                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG George K

                                  @Mik said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                  @George-K he does have a remarkable resilience.

                                  How did you get @Jon's password?

                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #72

                                  @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                  @Mik said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                  @George-K he does have a remarkable resilience.

                                  How did you get @Jon's password?

                                  1dh!tth@t ? Pretty simple, really…

                                  The Brad

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • George KG Offline
                                    George KG Offline
                                    George K
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #73

                                    The indictment lists these counts:

                                    • 31 counts of willful retention of classified documents
                                    • 1 count of conspiracy to obstruct justice
                                    • 1 count of withholding a document or record
                                    • 1 count of corruptly concealing a document or record
                                    • 1 count of concealing a document in a federal investigation
                                    • 1 count of scheme to conceal
                                    • and one count of making false statements and representations.

                                    We know for a fact that Pence and Biden have exposure on the basis of retention of classified documents. Pence's home, Biden's office, Biden's lawyers' office, and Biden's garage have all found to have classified documents.

                                    Why are they not being investigated by a grand jury?

                                    Granted the obstruction charges are a whole 'nother thing, but they are separate charges, 6 of them. Had Trump not (allegedly) obstructed, would have been charged with the first 31?

                                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • George KG George K

                                      The indictment lists these counts:

                                      • 31 counts of willful retention of classified documents
                                      • 1 count of conspiracy to obstruct justice
                                      • 1 count of withholding a document or record
                                      • 1 count of corruptly concealing a document or record
                                      • 1 count of concealing a document in a federal investigation
                                      • 1 count of scheme to conceal
                                      • and one count of making false statements and representations.

                                      We know for a fact that Pence and Biden have exposure on the basis of retention of classified documents. Pence's home, Biden's office, Biden's lawyers' office, and Biden's garage have all found to have classified documents.

                                      Why are they not being investigated by a grand jury?

                                      Granted the obstruction charges are a whole 'nother thing, but they are separate charges, 6 of them. Had Trump not (allegedly) obstructed, would have been charged with the first 31?

                                      AxtremusA Away
                                      AxtremusA Away
                                      Axtremus
                                      wrote on last edited by Axtremus
                                      #74

                                      @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                      • 31 counts of willful retention of classified documents

                                      ...
                                      We know for a fact that Pence and Biden have exposure on the basis of retention of classified documents. ...
                                      Why are they not being investigated by a grand jury?

                                      You missed the word "willful."

                                      LuFins DadL George KG 2 Replies Last reply
                                      • X Offline
                                        X Offline
                                        xenon
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #75

                                        I think there’s a big difference between “should have known better” and “fuck them, I’m taking this”.

                                        I don’t know enough about the details to know what happened in this latest case - but I’m guessing it’s more of the latter.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                          @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                          • 31 counts of willful retention of classified documents

                                          ...
                                          We know for a fact that Pence and Biden have exposure on the basis of retention of classified documents. ...
                                          Why are they not being investigated by a grand jury?

                                          You missed the word "willful."

                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins Dad
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #76

                                          @Axtremus said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                          @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                          • 31 counts of willful retention of classified documents

                                          ...
                                          We know for a fact that Pence and Biden have exposure on the basis of retention of classified documents. ...
                                          Why are they not being investigated by a grand jury?

                                          You missed the word "willful."

                                          That argument might hold water for Pence, but not with Biden, based on the reactions of many of his Congressional peers…

                                          Beyond that, I fully support Trump serving time for breaking these laws if proven beyond a read doubt in a fair and impartial court.

                                          I’m just also for the same for Pence, Biden, and Hilary. The problem goes back to Comey…

                                          The Brad

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups