Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures."
-
wrote on 16 May 2023, 12:51 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures.":
Meuller: indictments and convictions
Durham: vibesThe Mueller investigation was to see if there was Russian interference, specifically helping the Trump campaign. IT found none. I'd call that exculpatory.
The convictions were on unrelated charges, most of them, process crimes.
-
@jon-nyc said in Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures.":
Meuller: indictments and convictions
Durham: vibesThe Mueller investigation was to see if there was Russian interference, specifically helping the Trump campaign. IT found none. I'd call that exculpatory.
The convictions were on unrelated charges, most of them, process crimes.
wrote on 16 May 2023, 12:58 last edited by@George-K Not true at all. It found:
- Russia helped Trump
- Trump welcomed that help, even publicly
- His campaign tried to get even more help
- His campaign manager actually shared campaign strategy and polling information with the Russians
- All of them repeatedly lied about it.
-
wrote on 16 May 2023, 13:39 last edited by
Don't remember all of that. Got a specific place in the report that lays that out?
-
wrote on 16 May 2023, 13:42 last edited by jon-nyc
Of course you don’t. How often do you expose yourself to a news source that isn’t bias conformational?
-
wrote on 16 May 2023, 16:14 last edited by
Yeah, I don't read the NYT, therefore I is an ignerant rube.
-
wrote on 16 May 2023, 16:16 last edited by
@Jolly said in Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures.":
I don't read the NYT
Speaking of which, have they returned that Pulitzer yet?
-
wrote on 16 May 2023, 16:18 last edited by
-
wrote on 16 May 2023, 17:43 last edited by
I guess some Russian disinformation is OK, then.
-
wrote on 17 May 2023, 11:53 last edited by
CIA: Hey, Clinton's trying to frame Trump.
Strzok: Spike that story.
FBI Deputy Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Dina Corsi told the team not to put anything in writing about the fake dossier, in what an FBI lawyer in the room said was "the most inappropriate operational or professional statement he had ever heard at the FBI."
FBI agents said top brass pressured them intensely to continue investigating "dry holes," and they were asking, "What are we even doing here?" because it was so obviously fake. The Steele dossier went missing within FBI for 75 days before being foisted on them with no time to vet
While chasing down every conceivable flimsy rabbit hole sourced from literally fabricated anonymous sources saying preposterous things, the FBI studiously avoided simply getting to the bottom of it by refusing to interview those most involved: Dolan, Papadapolous, Carter Page.
-
wrote on 17 May 2023, 12:46 last edited by
I think the big question now becomes "Why?" .
-
wrote on 17 May 2023, 13:05 last edited by
@Jolly said in Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures.":
I think the big question now becomes "Why?" .
Silly @jolly. You really think someone's going to ask?