Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures."

[George K]

https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-durham-report

The CIA had direct knowledge of the Clinton plan (“Clinton Plan”) to vilify Trump by linking him to Putin and Russia. On August 3, 2016, CIA Director John Brennon met with President Obama, VP Biden, and other senior Administration officials, including but not limited to Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey. At that meeting, Brennan informed them of the Clinton Plan:

FBI did nothing to vet or investigate the Clinton Plan - even though they were using parts of the Clinton Plan (the Steele Reports) - to investigate the Trump Campaign. Durham writes: “No FBI personnel who were interviewed by the Office recalled Crossfire Hurricane personnel taking any action to vet the Clinton Plan intelligence.”

FBI and CIA, with no substantiation took the "Clinton Plan" to discredit Trump as a Russian asset to the Obama White House. Read that really slowly.

And the source for the "Steele" dossier, Dachenko? FBI knew he was lying, and still paid I'm about a quarter-million dollars.

[Jolly]

Time for Section 702 to end.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-reports-lingering-consequence-joe-biden-congress

[George K]

@jon-nyc said in Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures.":

Meuller: indictments and convictions
Durham: vibes

The Mueller investigation was to see if there was Russian interference, specifically helping the Trump campaign. IT found none. I'd call that exculpatory.

The convictions were on unrelated charges, most of them, process crimes.

[jon-nyc]

@George-K Not true at all. It found:

1. Russia helped Trump
2. Trump welcomed that help, even publicly
3. His campaign tried to get even more help
4. His campaign manager actually shared campaign strategy and polling information with the Russians
5. All of them repeatedly lied about it.

[Jolly]

Don't remember all of that. Got a specific place in the report that lays that out?

[jon-nyc]

Of course you don’t. How often do you expose yourself to a news source that isn’t bias conformational?

[Jolly]

Yeah, I don't read the NYT, therefore I is an ignerant rube.

[George K]

@Jolly said in Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures.":

I don't read the NYT

Speaking of which, have they returned that Pulitzer yet?

[Jolly]

[George K]

I guess some Russian disinformation is OK, then.

[George K]

CIA: Hey, Clinton's trying to frame Trump.

Strzok: Spike that story.

---

FBI Deputy Assistant Director for Counterintelligence Dina Corsi told the team not to put anything in writing about the fake dossier, in what an FBI lawyer in the room said was "the most inappropriate operational or professional statement he had ever heard at the FBI."

FBI agents said top brass pressured them intensely to continue investigating "dry holes," and they were asking, "What are we even doing here?" because it was so obviously fake. The Steele dossier went missing within FBI for 75 days before being foisted on them with no time to vet

While chasing down every conceivable flimsy rabbit hole sourced from literally fabricated anonymous sources saying preposterous things, the FBI studiously avoided simply getting to the bottom of it by refusing to interview those most involved: Dolan, Papadapolous, Carter Page.

[Jolly]

I think the big question now becomes "Why?" .

[George K]

@Jolly said in Durham Report: "Extremely troublesome failures.":

I think the big question now becomes "Why?" .

Silly @jolly. You really think someone's going to ask?