Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Those deadly air conditioners...

Those deadly air conditioners...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
15 Posts 7 Posters 121 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taiwan_girlT Online
    taiwan_girlT Online
    taiwan_girl
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

    For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

    A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
    A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

    I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

      Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

      For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

      A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
      A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

      I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

      JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      @taiwan_girl said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

      Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

      For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

      A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
      A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

      I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

      And my grandmother's Coldspot from the 1950's is still in use. Ask an appliance guy about how long a new frig lasts today.

      If you have to buy a frig every 5:years, how energy efficient is that?

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Jolly

        @taiwan_girl said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

        Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

        For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

        A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
        A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

        I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

        And my grandmother's Coldspot from the 1950's is still in use. Ask an appliance guy about how long a new frig lasts today.

        If you have to buy a frig every 5:years, how energy efficient is that?

        AxtremusA Away
        AxtremusA Away
        Axtremus
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

        And my grandmother's Coldspot from the 1950's is still in use. Ask an appliance guy about how long a new frig lasts today.

        If you have to buy a frig every 5:years, how energy efficient is that?

        How do you know that shortened usable lives of refrigerators is caused by higher efficiency standard? Could it not be due to manufacturers' profit seeking?

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Work on the damn things, lad.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor Phibes
            wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
            #9

            This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

            7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

            I was only joking

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

              This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

              7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              @Doctor-Phibes said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

              This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

              7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

              It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              George KG AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
              • JollyJ Jolly

                @Doctor-Phibes said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

                7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

                It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

                George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable

                If you can find it. Everything from major appliances to televisions have become disposable.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by Jolly
                  #12

                  Pretty much.

                  There are a few dinosaurs still out there...

                  https://speedqueen.com/products/top-load-washers/tc5003wn/

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    @Doctor-Phibes said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                    This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

                    7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

                    It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

                    AxtremusA Away
                    AxtremusA Away
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                    It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

                    Depends on the technological maturity of the product and the industrial ecosystem needed to support the product.

                    Some products require consumable parts. If you cannot get those parts, you cannot use the product anymore even if the product itself is still rock solid.

                    Some products require outside support (e.g., network connectivity, server interaction). The product, though durable by itself, may stop working once the required outside support ceases.

                    Some products were manufactured with hazardous materials that were not known to be hazardous at the time. Depends on the nature of the hazard, you may want to get rid of the product long before it becomes unusable absent the newly discovered hazard. Ditto mechanical design issues concerning safety.

                    Better to buy a simple hammer that lasts decades, not so a smartphone. Probably OK for cars running on gasoline or diesel, probably not there yet for hybrids/EVs.

                    Refrigerator and other large household appliances? Probably OK to spend more to get a longer lasting one, but no point for it to last much longer than your time owning the house if you know you’re going to sell the house not too far down the road. Not necessarily because you don’t want to leave nice stuff for the next owner, but the next owner may have different preferences anyway, be they for style or function.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG George K

                      @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                      Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable

                      If you can find it. Everything from major appliances to televisions have become disposable.

                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                      #14

                      @George-K said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                      @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                      Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable

                      If you can find it. Everything from major appliances to televisions have become disposable.

                      That's not due to government legislation, that's a strategic call that's been made by manufacturers, driven both by commercial thinking, and also by a public that wants the next best thing in a very rapidly changing technological environment.

                      As far as televisions go, is anybody going to try and argue that what you got in 1960 is better than what's available today? Vinyl arguments are bad enough, but claiming that the picture 'was warmer' back then would really be jumping the shark.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • taiwan_girlT Online
                        taiwan_girlT Online
                        taiwan_girl
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        I agree with Ax on this. The decrease in the "life" of the product is probably NOT because of increased efficiency. I think they are two different subjects.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups