Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Those deadly air conditioners...

Those deadly air conditioners...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
15 Posts 7 Posters 121 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    Here's an idea that was floated a couple of years ago:

    "OK DC, you want to limit airconditioners? Fine - you first. I'll stop by in August to see how it's working out for you."

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • taiwan_girlT Online
      taiwan_girlT Online
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

      For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

      A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
      A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

      I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

        Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

        For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

        A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
        A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

        I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        @taiwan_girl said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

        Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

        For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

        A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
        A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

        I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

        And my grandmother's Coldspot from the 1950's is still in use. Ask an appliance guy about how long a new frig lasts today.

        If you have to buy a frig every 5:years, how energy efficient is that?

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Jolly

          @taiwan_girl said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

          Not sure why you guys think this is a bad idea.

          For example, energy efficiency of refrigerators:

          A fridge in 1975 used about 2200 kWh/year of energy.
          A fridge in 2013 used about 460 kWh/year of energy.

          I dont think that refridges have gotten smaller. Increasing standards required of manufactures were the main driver. I dont think that anybody has complained that refridges have gotten worse because of that.

          And my grandmother's Coldspot from the 1950's is still in use. Ask an appliance guy about how long a new frig lasts today.

          If you have to buy a frig every 5:years, how energy efficient is that?

          AxtremusA Away
          AxtremusA Away
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

          And my grandmother's Coldspot from the 1950's is still in use. Ask an appliance guy about how long a new frig lasts today.

          If you have to buy a frig every 5:years, how energy efficient is that?

          How do you know that shortened usable lives of refrigerators is caused by higher efficiency standard? Could it not be due to manufacturers' profit seeking?

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Work on the damn things, lad.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
              #9

              This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

              7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

              I was only joking

              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

                7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                @Doctor-Phibes said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

                7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

                It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                George KG AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                  This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

                  7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

                  It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

                  George KG Offline
                  George KG Offline
                  George K
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                  Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable

                  If you can find it. Everything from major appliances to televisions have become disposable.

                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                  Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by Jolly
                    #12

                    Pretty much.

                    There are a few dinosaurs still out there...

                    https://speedqueen.com/products/top-load-washers/tc5003wn/

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      @Doctor-Phibes said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                      This is from 1960. What's that price work out at in today's money? About $2600.

                      7cc8b15d-6e39-4d95-88a7-ec9b0deee393-image.png

                      It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

                      AxtremusA Away
                      AxtremusA Away
                      Axtremus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                      It's an interesting discussion...Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable or pay less for something that will last six or seven years?

                      Depends on the technological maturity of the product and the industrial ecosystem needed to support the product.

                      Some products require consumable parts. If you cannot get those parts, you cannot use the product anymore even if the product itself is still rock solid.

                      Some products require outside support (e.g., network connectivity, server interaction). The product, though durable by itself, may stop working once the required outside support ceases.

                      Some products were manufactured with hazardous materials that were not known to be hazardous at the time. Depends on the nature of the hazard, you may want to get rid of the product long before it becomes unusable absent the newly discovered hazard. Ditto mechanical design issues concerning safety.

                      Better to buy a simple hammer that lasts decades, not so a smartphone. Probably OK for cars running on gasoline or diesel, probably not there yet for hybrids/EVs.

                      Refrigerator and other large household appliances? Probably OK to spend more to get a longer lasting one, but no point for it to last much longer than your time owning the house if you know you’re going to sell the house not too far down the road. Not necessarily because you don’t want to leave nice stuff for the next owner, but the next owner may have different preferences anyway, be they for style or function.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • George KG George K

                        @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                        Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable

                        If you can find it. Everything from major appliances to televisions have become disposable.

                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                        #14

                        @George-K said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                        @Jolly said in Those deadly air conditioners...:

                        Is it better to pay more for something that can last decades and is easily repairable

                        If you can find it. Everything from major appliances to televisions have become disposable.

                        That's not due to government legislation, that's a strategic call that's been made by manufacturers, driven both by commercial thinking, and also by a public that wants the next best thing in a very rapidly changing technological environment.

                        As far as televisions go, is anybody going to try and argue that what you got in 1960 is better than what's available today? Vinyl arguments are bad enough, but claiming that the picture 'was warmer' back then would really be jumping the shark.

                        I was only joking

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • taiwan_girlT Online
                          taiwan_girlT Online
                          taiwan_girl
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          I agree with Ax on this. The decrease in the "life" of the product is probably NOT because of increased efficiency. I think they are two different subjects.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups