Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. New food labels coming to US

New food labels coming to US

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
14 Posts 8 Posters 83 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I wish it just the nutrition for the full package instead of serving.

    HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Multiply by “servings per container” and Bob’s your uncle.

      "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
      -Cormac McCarthy

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 89th

        I wish it just the nutrition for the full package instead of serving.

        HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        @89th said in New food labels coming to US:

        I wish it just the nutrition for the full package instead of serving.

        Package is the serving amirite

        Education is extremely important.

        MikM 1 Reply Last reply
        • KlausK Offline
          KlausK Offline
          Klaus
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          I think it would make sense to give the values per 100g. "Serving size" is BS. Nobody eats just the "serving size" of anything.

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • KlausK Klaus

            I think it would make sense to give the values per 100g. "Serving size" is BS. Nobody eats just the "serving size" of anything.

            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @Klaus

            One of the changes is making the serving size more representative. They won’t be able to make bag of chips you’d eat with lunch and call it 2.5 servings.

            "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
            -Cormac McCarthy

            KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              @Klaus

              One of the changes is making the serving size more representative. They won’t be able to make bag of chips you’d eat with lunch and call it 2.5 servings.

              KlausK Offline
              KlausK Offline
              Klaus
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @jon-nyc said in New food labels coming to US:

              @Klaus

              One of the changes is making the serving size more representative. They won’t be able to make bag of chips you’d eat with lunch and call it 2.5 servings.

              OK, fair enough, but if I look at labels, I usually want to compare with alternative products. Does this salami have more calories than the other one? If the serving sizes are different - well, we know how good people are at the rule of three.

              Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Horace

                @89th said in New food labels coming to US:

                I wish it just the nutrition for the full package instead of serving.

                Package is the serving amirite

                MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @Horace said in New food labels coming to US:

                @89th said in New food labels coming to US:

                I wish it just the nutrition for the full package instead of serving.

                Package is the serving amirite

                For instance, on a box of Oreos, it lists two cookies as a serving. Everybody knows a serving of Oreos is a row.

                “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  ⬅ approves of these changes.

                  Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    The food industry really pushed back hard against added sugars, but lost.

                    I'm glad they did, now they will work to lower or eliminate those numbers in many cases.

                    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                    -Cormac McCarthy

                    Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      I've been pretty compulsive about reading those labels for many years, along with the ingredients.

                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        The food industry really pushed back hard against added sugars, but lost.

                        I'm glad they did, now they will work to lower or eliminate those numbers in many cases.

                        Catseye3C Offline
                        Catseye3C Offline
                        Catseye3
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @jon-nyc said in New food labels coming to US:

                        now they will work to lower or eliminate those numbers in many cases.

                        Yes, but I have wondered for a long time how, or how well, the accuracy of the nutrition labels is enforced. If Kraft says an item has 5 grams of sugar, what's keeping it from adding 7 grams?

                        Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • KlausK Klaus

                          @jon-nyc said in New food labels coming to US:

                          @Klaus

                          One of the changes is making the serving size more representative. They won’t be able to make bag of chips you’d eat with lunch and call it 2.5 servings.

                          OK, fair enough, but if I look at labels, I usually want to compare with alternative products. Does this salami have more calories than the other one? If the serving sizes are different - well, we know how good people are at the rule of three.

                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          @Klaus said in New food labels coming to US:

                          Does this salami have more calories than the other one?

                          The age old question.

                          I was only joking

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • CopperC Offline
                            CopperC Offline
                            Copper
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            I like the labels.

                            I don't look at them most of the time, but they tend to tell me what I want to know.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups