She’s gone.
-
-
@Jolly said in She’s gone.:
Wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the British Monarchy?
I think William will be very popular when he succeeds. There might be a bit of a hiccup with Charlie.
Proud supporter of Plan 2525. Everything you think, do and say will be in the pill you took today.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Jolly said in She’s gone.:
Wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the British Monarchy?
I think William will be very popular when he succeeds. There might be a bit of a hiccup with Charlie.
William might be popular, but it kind of feels like this is the end of the line in a way. While a figurehead position, she had a very real and lasting impact on the UK and the rest of the world. From here on out it feels like Paris Hilton celebrity status…
-
Seems correct, though if William has it for some decades you could imagine him developing quite a bit of gravitas over time.
Charles will always be a little bitch, no matter what he does. His best contribution to the monarchy would be to die at 80.
-
Here's something I have no feel for. The Highness has great value for soul of the realm and ceremonial things and receiving foreign leaders and pomp where it's needed and what have you, but -- and not at all meaning disrespect for her/him, compared to the prime minister and parliament, how much role does s/he have in actual governance?
IOW, how much effect might the wussiness/gasbaggery/leadership excellence/etc of the Highness have, day to day?
Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka
-
No role except ceremonial.
But that’s sort of the point. You have to have the stature and reverence to pull off the ceremonial role. Elizabeth had it without question. Chuckie? Meh.
DON’T let them eat cake.
- RFK Jr -
Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka
-
I think not. Too many years being a literal and figurative putz.
I’m sure he’ll perform the ceremonies well. But I agree the royal family is in a holding pattern until William takes over.
-
Seen on Twitter:
“Just a reminder that Elizabeth has reigned for 30% of US history”.
Related:
“The Brits think 100 miles is a long distance. The Americans think 100 years is a long time.”
-
As he's named 'Charles Philip Arthur George', I'm a little disappointed that he didn't go with the name 'Arthur'. There'd be a big debate whether he should be Arthur I, or Arthur II.
-
-
@jon-nyc said in She’s gone.:
Pelosi orders Capitol flags to be flown at half-staff. That’s rarely done for non-Americans.
Considering she was Queen back when Truman was President... jeez, I had to stop writing after I wrote that. That's mind boggling. She was Queen a good 7 years before Castro even took over Cuba.
-
-
@89th said in She’s gone.:
@Copper said in She’s gone.:
I know she was old, but I haven't seen a mention of the cause.
Has there been a mention of this yet?
I believe skydiving.
Bond finally screwed up…
-
@jon-nyc said in She’s gone.:
Seems correct, though if William has it for some decades you could imagine him developing quite a bit of gravitas over time.
Indeed, I think William will provide another 40-50 years of solid monarchy rule, then another 40-50 years by his son George.
That being said, the monarchy is certainly a "thing" that doesn't really fit in with the fast-moving culture that must be politically correct, woke, anti-rich, anti-white, etc.......but it seems as long as the Brits support it, it will exist, for whatever purpose it serves these days.
