She’s gone.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:03 last edited by
She has been a constant for many people, not just in the UK. I have nothing but great admiration and respect for her. I'm actually kind of teary.
RIP Elizabeth II.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:07 last edited by
RIP
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:10 last edited by
RIP
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:12 last edited by
I was thinking about this, and she was arguably the most famous person in the world. Other people might be more talked about, but they come and go, but she's got to be the most recognizable person I can think of.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:12 last edited by Renauda 9 Aug 2022, 22:19
Liz Truss just addressed the nation in front of 10 Downing and referred to King Charles III.
It’s official, His Majesty will rule as King Charles III.
Note Charles will no longer be referred as His Royal Highness but rather His Majesty. HRH is for Princes and Princesses.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:15 last edited by
NYT headlined her as "Britian's Beacon of Stability."
Man, I'm all . . .
I don't know what.
-
NYT headlined her as "Britian's Beacon of Stability."
Man, I'm all . . .
I don't know what.
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:18 last edited by -
Liz Truss just addressed the nation in front of 10 Downing and referred to King Charles III.
It’s official, His Majesty will rule as King Charles III.
Note Charles will no longer be referred as His Royal Highness but rather His Majesty. HRH is for Princes and Princesses.
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:20 last edited by jon-nyc 9 Aug 2022, 18:20@Renauda said in She’s gone.:
Liz Truss just addressed the nation in front of 10 Downing and referred to King Charles III.
Was the queen well enough to formally invite her to lead her government the other day?
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:20 last edited by
As genuinely sad as I feel, I'm very glad that I'm not in the UK at the moment. They won't talk about anything else for weeks.
-
@Renauda said in She’s gone.:
Liz Truss just addressed the nation in front of 10 Downing and referred to King Charles III.
Was the queen well enough to formally invite her to lead her government the other day?
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:21 last edited by@jon-nyc said in She’s gone.:
@Renauda said in She’s gone.:
Liz Truss just addressed the nation in front of 10 Downing and referred to King Charles III.
Was the queen well enough to formally invite her to lead her government the other day?
Yes, I believe she met her at Balmoral 2 days ago
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:22 last edited by
Pelosi orders Capitol flags to be flown at half-staff. That’s rarely done for non-Americans.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:26 last edited by
Nice lady, the epitome of noblesse oblige.
Wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the British Monarchy?
-
I was thinking about this, and she was arguably the most famous person in the world. Other people might be more talked about, but they come and go, but she's got to be the most recognizable person I can think of.
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:27 last edited by Friday 9 Aug 2022, 18:29@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
I was thinking about this, and she was arguably the most famous person in the world. Other people might be more talked about, but they come and go, but she's got to be the most recognizable person I can think of.
When people say "the Queen" people know it's referring to Elizabeth II. When they show an image of a little white haired lady in a bright colored hat with a purse dangling on her arm, people know it's the Queen.
Heck, even my children recognize her and they have nothing to do with Britain. In fact, it was my daughter who texted me this morning and ask "Did you guys hear about the Queen?"
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 18:34 last edited by
I know she was old, but I haven't seen a mention of the cause.
Has there been a mention of this yet?
-
Nice lady, the epitome of noblesse oblige.
Wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the British Monarchy?
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 19:01 last edited by@Jolly said in She’s gone.:
Wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the British Monarchy?
I think William will be very popular when he succeeds. There might be a bit of a hiccup with Charlie.
-
@Jolly said in She’s gone.:
Wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the British Monarchy?
I think William will be very popular when he succeeds. There might be a bit of a hiccup with Charlie.
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 20:08 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in She’s gone.:
@Jolly said in She’s gone.:
Wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the British Monarchy?
I think William will be very popular when he succeeds. There might be a bit of a hiccup with Charlie.
William might be popular, but it kind of feels like this is the end of the line in a way. While a figurehead position, she had a very real and lasting impact on the UK and the rest of the world. From here on out it feels like Paris Hilton celebrity status…
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 20:40 last edited by
Seems correct, though if William has it for some decades you could imagine him developing quite a bit of gravitas over time.
Charles will always be a little bitch, no matter what he does. His best contribution to the monarchy would be to die at 80.
-
Seems correct, though if William has it for some decades you could imagine him developing quite a bit of gravitas over time.
Charles will always be a little bitch, no matter what he does. His best contribution to the monarchy would be to die at 80.
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 20:43 last edited by@jon-nyc said in She’s gone.:
Charles will always be a little bitch, no matter what he does. His best contribution to the monarchy would be to die at 80.
Harsh but true. He's a gasbag.
-
wrote on 8 Sept 2022, 20:57 last edited by Catseye3 9 Aug 2022, 20:59
Here's something I have no feel for. The Highness has great value for soul of the realm and ceremonial things and receiving foreign leaders and pomp where it's needed and what have you, but -- and not at all meaning disrespect for her/him, compared to the prime minister and parliament, how much role does s/he have in actual governance?
IOW, how much effect might the wussiness/gasbaggery/leadership excellence/etc of the Highness have, day to day?
-
Here's something I have no feel for. The Highness has great value for soul of the realm and ceremonial things and receiving foreign leaders and pomp where it's needed and what have you, but -- and not at all meaning disrespect for her/him, compared to the prime minister and parliament, how much role does s/he have in actual governance?
IOW, how much effect might the wussiness/gasbaggery/leadership excellence/etc of the Highness have, day to day?