Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mar-a-Lago raided

Mar-a-Lago raided

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
780 Posts 20 Posters 38.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • X Offline
    X Offline
    xenon
    wrote on last edited by
    #536

    This is so Trump.

    There’s no grand conspiracy or much to gain for him with these docs.

    He gets in trouble through ignorance and apathy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      @Axtremus said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

      @Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

      Why would he want to cooperate with organizations that have tried to do nothing but harm him for six or seven years?

      Forget about “cooperation.” Simply following the law would be nice.

      Do you have pom-poms to go along with that cheerleader outfit?

      AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote on last edited by
      #537

      @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

      @Axtremus said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

      @Mik said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

      Why would he want to cooperate with organizations that have tried to do nothing but harm him for six or seven years?

      Forget about “cooperation.” Simply following the law would be nice.

      Do you have pom-poms to go along with that cheerleader outfit?

      Cheerleading is not illegal, unlike keeping US Government properties that you’re not allowed to keep.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • Catseye3C Catseye3

        @Renauda

        I think that was me. I scratched around to find an accurate answer, and was surprised to learn there were no protocols for the president.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote on last edited by Renauda
        #538

        @Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

        @Renauda

        I think that was me. I scratched around to find an accurate answer, and was surprised to learn there were no protocols for the president.

        Don’t think so. This was your link from that point in the argument:

        https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/aug/11/could-trump-argue-declassified-documents/

        The answer though lies somewhere between posts 316 and 350 of this thread.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #539

          89th may not agree, but I still maintain that a President can declassify a document at will.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          89th8 1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            89th may not agree, but I still maintain that a President can declassify a document at will.

            89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote on last edited by
            #540

            @Jolly said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

            89th may not agree, but I still maintain that a President can declassify a document at will.

            They can, but there is still a process for it. Think of it like an executive order. A president can say an order, but he still needs to publish and sign and whatever an actual document.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • X Offline
              X Offline
              xenon
              wrote on last edited by xenon
              #541

              Link to video

              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #542

                Indictment?

                Bottom line from Andrew McCarthy:

                "Based on its continuing investigation, particularly interviews of witnesses whom prosecutors do not want to identify, the FBI concluded that Trump persisted in storing top-secret intelligence at Mar-a-Lago. While some was likely to be in the boxes, other documents were apt to be found in his office space, among other places he frequented.

                That is just what the August 8 search uncovered. As prosecutors point out, in addition to finding classified documents in Trump’s office, the FBI found 76 classified documents in storage room boxes — more than twice as many as Trump’s representatives produced on June 3 when they claimed there was nothing more to be found at the resort.

                This is a serious obstruction case that appears as if it would not be difficult to prove. The Justice Department is under immense pressure from the Democratic base to indict Trump, and the jury pool in Washington, DC, where the government would file any indictment, is intensely anti-Trump. It is thus hard to imagine that Attorney General Merrick Garland will decide against filing charges."

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                • George KG George K

                  Indictment?

                  Bottom line from Andrew McCarthy:

                  "Based on its continuing investigation, particularly interviews of witnesses whom prosecutors do not want to identify, the FBI concluded that Trump persisted in storing top-secret intelligence at Mar-a-Lago. While some was likely to be in the boxes, other documents were apt to be found in his office space, among other places he frequented.

                  That is just what the August 8 search uncovered. As prosecutors point out, in addition to finding classified documents in Trump’s office, the FBI found 76 classified documents in storage room boxes — more than twice as many as Trump’s representatives produced on June 3 when they claimed there was nothing more to be found at the resort.

                  This is a serious obstruction case that appears as if it would not be difficult to prove. The Justice Department is under immense pressure from the Democratic base to indict Trump, and the jury pool in Washington, DC, where the government would file any indictment, is intensely anti-Trump. It is thus hard to imagine that Attorney General Merrick Garland will decide against filing charges."

                  Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3C Offline
                  Catseye3
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #543

                  @George-K said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                  the jury pool in Washington, DC, where the government would file any indictment, is intensely anti-Trump.

                  I don't know anything about grand jury selection, if that's what he's talking about. Do people ever file for a change of venue for a grand jury? Cuz that would be yet another delaying tactic for Trump.

                  Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                    #544

                    That must have been a hard column for him to write. Though he phrased it as ‘does the DOJ have a case’, he’s really saying ‘did Donald Trump conceal these documents and lie about it’. And his conclusion is a resounding yes.

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      That must have been a hard column for him to write. Though he phrased it as ‘does the DOJ have a case’, he’s really saying ‘did Donald Trump conceal these documents and lie about it’. And his conclusion is a resounding yes.

                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #545

                      @jon-nyc said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                      That must have been a hard column for him to write. Though he phrased it as ‘does the DOJ have a case’, he’s really saying ‘did Donald Trump conceal these documents and lie about it’. And his conclusion is a resounding yes.

                      Clearly he's become a RINO and a Very Bad Person. So bad.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #546

                        F751DD56-B15E-44C1-81F1-3A41F7ED2D98.jpeg

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #547

                          Rino squish.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Catseye3C Offline
                            Catseye3C Offline
                            Catseye3
                            wrote on last edited by Catseye3
                            #548

                            It's "none of these documents is his," you troglodyte.

                            Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                            George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                            • Catseye3C Catseye3

                              It's "none of these documents is his," you troglodyte.

                              George KG Offline
                              George KG Offline
                              George K
                              wrote on last edited by George K
                              #549

                              @Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                              It's "none of these documents is his". you troglodyte turdblossom.

                              There.

                              And either is correct:

                              https://grammarforexperts.com/none-of-these-them-is-or-are/

                              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                              Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                              • George KG George K

                                @Catseye3 said in Mar-a-Lago raided:

                                It's "none of these documents is his". you troglodyte turdblossom.

                                There.

                                And either is correct:

                                https://grammarforexperts.com/none-of-these-them-is-or-are/

                                Catseye3C Offline
                                Catseye3C Offline
                                Catseye3
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #550

                                @George-K

                                "When none is in the sense of ‘not any persons or things,’ the plural is more common."

                                It might be more common, but it ain't more right.

                                Grump.

                                Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #551

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • George KG Offline
                                    George KG Offline
                                    George K
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #552

                                    Yeah, it's the Daily Beast, but...

                                    Are Trump’s Passports the FBI’s Smoking Gun?

                                    When the FBI searched former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence earlier this month, they didn’t find a smoking gun, but they did find some smoldering passports.

                                    On August 8, agents removed from Trump’s home 33 boxes of sensitive government documents, including more than 100 records classified at the highest levels. In a 36-page brief responding to Trump’s motion to appoint a special master to review the material seized by the FBI, the Justice Department explained that three of the classified documents were recovered from Trump’s private office, known as “the 45 Office.”

                                    According to DOJ’s recent brief, classified documents in that office were “commingled” in a desk drawer with three passports. While the government did not disclose the name on the passports, Trump himself has complained that during the search, the FBI “stole” his three passports. It seems a safe bet that the passports DOJ recovered were Trump’s.

                                    The significance of the passports is enormous. As DOJ explained in an understated footnote, “The location of the passports is relevant evidence in an investigation of unauthorized retention and mishandling of national defense information.”

                                    In other words, the presence of the passports in the same drawer as the classified records tends to tie the unauthorized possession of these documents to Trump himself. A photo included with the filing shows the items that were recovered from his office. Among the classification markings on the documents are “Top Secret,” meaning that the disclosure of the material could cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security of the United States.

                                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • 89th8 Offline
                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #553

                                      I would imagine Trump's defense will eventually degrade to "they planted the documents, and staged the photos" unless the FBI has a live body-cam footage from start to finish of the raid.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • AxtremusA Offline
                                        AxtremusA Offline
                                        Axtremus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #554

                                        More detailed inventory of what the FBI has taken from Mar-A-Lago:

                                        https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/trump-v-US-inventory-09-02-2022.pdf

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • MikM Offline
                                          MikM Offline
                                          Mik
                                          wrote on last edited by Mik
                                          #555

                                          Looks like they just took everything they found. What business do they have taking news and magazine clippings? I'm inclined to accept Jolly's take that it was a fishing trip.

                                          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                          X AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups