"Shut up, peasant!"
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 15:48 last edited by Doctor Phibes 7 Jan 2022, 15:48
25% of Americans believe that God plays a role in who wins the Super Bowl.
11% of Americans believe that HTML is a venereal disease.
18% believe that Blu-Ray is a kind of sea creature.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:03 last edited by jon-nyc 7 Jan 2022, 16:04
Seems like nobody here understood his point. Remember they still are operating on the ‘putin is the reason for high gas prices’ message.
So the liberal world order he’s referring to isn’t as opposed to a conservative world order. It’s as opposed to dictators launching wars of empire at will.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:09 last edited by
It's 'liberal world order' as in 'liberal democracy'
Long, long ago, 'liberal' was actually a compliment.
-
Seems like nobody here understood his point. Remember they still are operating on the ‘putin is the reason for high gas prices’ message.
So the liberal world order he’s referring to isn’t as opposed to a conservative world order. It’s as opposed to dictators launching wars of empire at will.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:11 last edited by@jon-nyc said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Seems like nobody here understood his point. Remember they still are operating on the ‘putin is the reason for high gas prices’ message.
So the liberal world order he’s referring to isn’t as opposed to a conservative world order. It’s as opposed to dictators launching wars of empire at will.
Perhaps. Still a poor choice of phrase to use world order of any sort these days.
-
@jon-nyc said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Seems like nobody here understood his point. Remember they still are operating on the ‘putin is the reason for high gas prices’ message.
So the liberal world order he’s referring to isn’t as opposed to a conservative world order. It’s as opposed to dictators launching wars of empire at will.
Perhaps. Still a poor choice of phrase to use world order of any sort these days.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:17 last edited by@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Still a poor choice of phrase to use world order of any sort these days.
I confess I also took it the wrong way -- and nodded along with your doubt that it was authentic. But I like the notion of people like him using terms in their proper context -- the more often, the better. The more it happens, the greater the support against misuse and miscommunication.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:21 last edited by
Not sure I understand. How was that the proper context? It seemed to me inflammatory for no reason.
-
Not sure I understand. How was that the proper context? It seemed to me inflammatory for no reason.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:26 last edited by@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Not sure I understand. How was that the proper context? It seemed to me inflammatory for no reason.
I'm sure if I Googled for hours, I could find a couple of examples of certain former Presidents and their spokespeople saying insanely stupid shit.
Luckily for everyone, I can't be bothered.
-
Not sure I understand. How was that the proper context? It seemed to me inflammatory for no reason.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:26 last edited by Catseye3 7 Jan 2022, 16:28@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
How was that the proper context?
See Phibes' post at #11.
It probably was inflammatory, but only because he was misunderstood. But if we cease using words with accuracy for fear of inflaming the ignorant, we're giving in to ignorance.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:28 last edited by
It's actually worse than that. he's still blaming high gas prices on Russia. It was over $4 a year before they invaded. Such bullshit, and his attitude is atrocious.
-
@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
How was that the proper context?
See Phibes' post at #11.
It probably was inflammatory, but only because he was misunderstood. But if we cease using words with accuracy for fear of inflaming the ignorant, we're giving in to ignorance.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:28 last edited by@Catseye3 said in "Shut up, peasant!":
@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
How was that the proper context?
See Phibes' post at #11.
It probably was inflammatory, but only because he was misunderstood. But if we cease using words with accuracy, we're giving in to ignorance.
I disagree that his words were clear or accurate in any way.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:38 last edited by
"Liberal world order"
Wow
He was so comfortable using a sickening phrase like that.
That means he sits in the oval office with other people who use that phrase, and they all think it is good.
Terrifying
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 16:56 last edited by
It's likely he meant "western democracy" rather than "liberal", but the word choice was sloppy and likely indicative of how he thinks and how it all merges into one sloppy tribal mess of ideas. It's what they call a Freudian slip.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 17:02 last edited by
Let's be honest, gaffes are only serious and indicative of a greater malaise when the other guy does them.
-
Per this month's Harpers Index - citing a Yahoo/YouGov Poll, half of Republicans believe that high-level Democrats run a child sex-trafficking ring.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 17:23 last edited by@kluurs said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Per this month's Harpers Index - citing a Yahoo/YouGov Poll, half of Republicans believe that high-level Democrats run a child sex-trafficking ring.
Ridin' on the Lolita Express...
-
@Catseye3 said in "Shut up, peasant!":
@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
How was that the proper context?
See Phibes' post at #11.
It probably was inflammatory, but only because he was misunderstood. But if we cease using words with accuracy, we're giving in to ignorance.
I disagree that his words were clear or accurate in any way.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 17:25 last edited by@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
@Catseye3 said in "Shut up, peasant!":
@Mik said in "Shut up, peasant!":
How was that the proper context?
See Phibes' post at #11.
It probably was inflammatory, but only because he was misunderstood. But if we cease using words with accuracy, we're giving in to ignorance.
I disagree that his words were clear or accurate in any way.
Oh, I think he was clear. I understood him perfectly well. I'd think a lot of other people did, too.
Any damn fool that strings that phrase together in an interview, and supposedly represents the Executive Branch in some capacity, should know better.
-
@kluurs said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Per this month's Harpers Index - citing a Yahoo/YouGov Poll, half of Republicans believe that high-level Democrats run a child sex-trafficking ring.
Ridin' on the Lolita Express...
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 17:29 last edited by@Jolly said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Ridin' on the Lolita Express...
The plane, you mean? Epstein's plane? The guy on the right?
-
@Jolly said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Ridin' on the Lolita Express...
The plane, you mean? Epstein's plane? The guy on the right?
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 17:34 last edited by Jolly 7 Jan 2022, 17:35@Catseye3 said in "Shut up, peasant!":
@Jolly said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Ridin' on the Lolita Express...
The plane, you mean? Epstein's plane? The guy on the right?
Yep. I think he was on it once. And that appears to be a grown woman with him (Melania).
How many times was Bill on there?
And did it count towards his 2000 woman total, since it is rumored Bill was having sex with underage girls??
-
@Catseye3 said in "Shut up, peasant!":
@Jolly said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Ridin' on the Lolita Express...
The plane, you mean? Epstein's plane? The guy on the right?
Yep. I think he was on it once. And that appears to be a grown woman with him (Melania).
How many times was Bill on there?
And did it count towards his 2000 woman total, since it is rumored Bill was having sex with underage girls??
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 17:44 last edited by@Jolly said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Yep. I think he was on it once.
Hard to believe since it was his friggin plane.
By "his", I'm referring to Epstein.
-
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 19:12 last edited by
Liberal World Order is a bit of an oxymoron, no? I feel like Liberal World Free-for-all would've been better. Donnybrook? Melee? Brouhaha?
-
@Jolly said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Yep. I think he was on it once.
Hard to believe since it was his friggin plane.
By "his", I'm referring to Epstein.
wrote on 1 Jul 2022, 19:37 last edited by@Catseye3 said in "Shut up, peasant!":
@Jolly said in "Shut up, peasant!":
Yep. I think he was on it once.
Hard to believe since it was his friggin plane.
By "his", I'm referring to Epstein.
The flight logs are out there.
By right, I'm assuming you meant their right.
