Video of looters in Philly
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 03:39 last edited by
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9kfdW_1591046466
Worth watching the 4 minutes to get a real feel for the chaos.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 04:12 last edited by
Wow
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 04:20 last edited by
Looked for the most part like a bunch of painfully normal people out for a sightseeing stroll.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 05:26 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 05:59 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 08:36 last edited by
What I found most remarkable in that video was how many people were using bikes!
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 10:53 last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 10:55 last edited by
Well, maybe they all just looted a sporting goods store? Lol
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 11:01 last edited by Doctor Phibes 6 Mar 2020, 11:02
If you want to see where trouble starts, look to the cyclists.
It's a little known fact that Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin both competed in the very first Tour de France in 1903, and it was the frustration of being beaten by drug cheats that finally led Lenin to split with those awful Mencheviks with their stupid drop handlebars and oh-so-clever bloody lightweight frames.
-
If you want to see where trouble starts, look to the cyclists.
It's a little known fact that Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin both competed in the very first Tour de France in 1903, and it was the frustration of being beaten by drug cheats that finally led Lenin to split with those awful Mencheviks with their stupid drop handlebars and oh-so-clever bloody lightweight frames.
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 15:08 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Video of looters in Philly:
If you want to see where trouble starts, look to the cyclists.
It's a little known fact that Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin both competed in the very first Tour de France in 1903, and it was the frustration of being beaten by drug cheats that finally led Lenin to split with those awful Mencheviks with their stupid drop handlebars and oh-so-clever bloody lightweight frames.
It's been reported that the Kulaks are juicers. Just sayin'.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 21:45 last edited by
I may be 100% wrong and I will admit I dont have a lot of experience, but why is looting kind of a US "thing".
Yes, it happens in other countries, and sometimes big protests result in broken buildings and looting (see burning of Central World Department Store in BKK in 2010), but seems much more common in the US. Why is that?
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 21:48 last edited by
The two factors at play here are a large under-class with nothing to lose, and a larger enabling ruling class who consider it evil to hold the under-class accountable for their behavior.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 22:39 last edited by Catseye3 6 Mar 2020, 22:42
From Frank Bruni's column:
"Over the past week, Louisville has been the scene of especially tense encounters between protesters and the police, and of harrowing violence . . . Pictures and videos from Louisville portray a militarized police force and streets that look like war zones.
But a video from Sunday night portrayed something else. Captured and shared by Roberto Ferdman of Vice News, it showed a protester and a police officer clutching each other. Hugging.
“She just went in for the hug, and the officer accepted,” Ferdman wrote in the tweet in which the video appears. “Lasted almost a minute. Incredible.” Indeed. And while it’s just one moment involving two people, it says something and it means something. There’s hope in that hug."
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 22:59 last edited by
Damn decent of that officer hugging that rioter.
-
Damn decent of that officer hugging that rioter.
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 23:02 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Video of looters in Philly:
that rioter.
Was she rioting? Was she throwing bricks, frozen bottles of water? Was she looting?
I'm sure that that video is available on social media.
Otherwise, you're just making shit up.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 23:16 last edited by
I don't like hugs.
Hugs with strangers? No way.
-
The two factors at play here are a large under-class with nothing to lose, and a larger enabling ruling class who consider it evil to hold the under-class accountable for their behavior.
wrote on 3 Jun 2020, 23:16 last edited by@Horace said in Video of looters in Philly:
The two factors at play here are a large under-class with nothing to lose, and a larger enabling ruling class who consider it evil to hold the under-class accountable for their behavior.
Also insurance covers it and damage is justified, a satisfying fvck you.
-
wrote on 4 Jun 2020, 00:21 last edited by
But the same things are present in many countries. It just seems that it has become "acceptable" to riot and loot and destroy buildings.
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Video of looters in Philly:
that rioter.
Was she rioting? Was she throwing bricks, frozen bottles of water? Was she looting?
I'm sure that that video is available on social media.
Otherwise, you're just making shit up.
wrote on 4 Jun 2020, 00:42 last edited by@George-K said in Video of looters in Philly:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Video of looters in Philly:
that rioter.
Was she rioting? Was she throwing bricks, frozen bottles of water? Was she looting?
I'm sure that that video is available on social media.
Otherwise, you're just making shit up.
Helpful resource:
https://bit.ly/3gV5b14 -
@George-K said in Video of looters in Philly:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Video of looters in Philly:
that rioter.
Was she rioting? Was she throwing bricks, frozen bottles of water? Was she looting?
I'm sure that that video is available on social media.
Otherwise, you're just making shit up.
Helpful resource:
https://bit.ly/3gV5b14wrote on 4 Jun 2020, 00:46 last edited by@Aqua-Letifer said in Video of looters in Philly:
Helpful resource:
https://bit.ly/3gV5b14Thanks for the tip.
In another thread you commented that because something didn't appear on social media, it didn't happen. In fact, you said, you follow it closely, and since you didn't see it, the allegations about the "protestors" at St. John's were wrong, and it was all peaceful.
I'm simply turning your argument back at you. Since I didn't see that she didn't throw anything, there's a possibility that she did.