Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
The FBI thinks so. The AG, maybe not.
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/breaking-fbi-whistleblower-leaks-document-showing-bureau-targeting-news/
In common use I’d say no but for first amendment purposes absolutely. That needs to be a very wide definition to avoid the state making distinctions between ‘legitimate’ news orgs and others (that it doesn’t like).
What Veritas does is very similar to the old 60 Minutes hidden camera stuff, and that was considered news.
Far less specifically ideological. That’s the difference at least as far as common usage goes.
But again from a first amendment perspectives are the press
