Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. News Organization, Or Not?

News Organization, Or Not?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
4 Posts 2 Posters 48 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on 12 May 2022, 12:54 last edited by
    #1

    The FBI thinks so. The AG, maybe not.

    https://www.projectveritas.com/news/breaking-fbi-whistleblower-leaks-document-showing-bureau-targeting-news/

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on 12 May 2022, 13:36 last edited by
      #2

      In common use I’d say no but for first amendment purposes absolutely. That needs to be a very wide definition to avoid the state making distinctions between ‘legitimate’ news orgs and others (that it doesn’t like).

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on 12 May 2022, 17:49 last edited by
        #3

        What Veritas does is very similar to the old 60 Minutes hidden camera stuff, and that was considered news.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on 12 May 2022, 18:18 last edited by
          #4

          Far less specifically ideological. That’s the difference at least as far as common usage goes.

          But again from a first amendment perspectives are the press

          Thank you for your attention to this matter.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes

          1/4

          12 May 2022, 12:54


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          1 out of 4
          • First post
            1/4
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups