Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Fertility clinics in some red states

Fertility clinics in some red states

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
47 Posts 13 Posters 552 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Online
    T Online
    taiwan_girl
    wrote on 5 May 2022, 02:25 last edited by
    #33

    Wasnt it Freaknomics that had something like:

    "Decrease in crime can be related to increase in abortion, because more abortions were done by people in poorer areas?"

    1 Reply Last reply
    • J jon-nyc
      4 May 2022, 17:38

      @89th imagine if they had to do one at a time to avoid creating one that later would not be implanted.

      Sounds like it would be a lot of sessions in many cases and even less affordable.

      8 Offline
      8 Offline
      89th
      wrote on 5 May 2022, 03:15 last edited by
      #34

      @jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

      @89th imagine if they had to do one at a time to avoid creating one that later would not be implanted.

      Sounds like it would be a lot of sessions in many cases and even less affordable.

      What you're referencing is called the "retrieval" part of the process, basically. It usually ends up with the woman providing a number of eggs (usually between 5-20, IIRC) to which the male's sperm is then exposed in a lab environment, resulting in a number of fertilized zygotes which then become blastocysts/embryos (of which usually half show a mitosis strong enough to be considered a candidate for IVF transfer).

      To keep it simple, the process basically goes like this:

      • Retrieve 20 eggs
      • 10 are fertilized
      • 5 become "transfer-worthy" embryos
      • IVF has about a 30% success rate, so usually 2-4 IVF rounds are needed

      Depending on where you go, off the top of my head the retrieval/fertilization part is like $10k, and each IVF round is like $5k.

      So yes, trying to start and end that whole process with just 1 embryo is nearly impractical. Not to mention the cost for the services, the HUNDREDS of doctor visits involved (we probably had 200-300 visits over 24 months before we had our first kid, no joke), the numerous daily shots you have to give the woman, and the emotional stress of the whole thing.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on 5 May 2022, 10:16 last edited by
        #35

        It seems like it will close that option for many families. Even if you can afford to go out of state for it, it just isn’t practical given the number of visits unless you live close to the border.

        Like St Louis folks can go to IL but the Kansas City folks will probably have no options.

        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
        -Cormac McCarthy

        1 Reply Last reply
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          bachophile
          wrote on 5 May 2022, 10:25 last edited by bachophile 5 May 2022, 10:33
          #36

          People can move here and have it all covered by national health insurance

          https://www.health.gov.il/English/Topics/fertility/Pages/ivf.aspx

          IVF IN ISRAEL.
          The country has the highest IVF rate per capita worldwide.

          Where Families Are Prized, Help Is Free
          https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/18/world/middleeast/18israel.html

          1 Reply Last reply
          • J jon-nyc
            4 May 2022, 18:24

            I’ve seen estimates that the number of abortions will decrease only by about 10-15% since abortion is more common in states that are abortion friendly.

            Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.

            So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on 5 May 2022, 11:45 last edited by
            #37

            @jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

            I’ve seen estimates that the number of abortions will decrease only by about 10-15% since abortion is more common in states that are abortion friendly.

            Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.

            So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.

            Interesting side note... I've seen where if there were no abortion, the percentage of black people in America would be doubled.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            C 1 Reply Last reply 5 May 2022, 16:43
            • M Mik
              4 May 2022, 18:14

              Off topic somewhat, but I would like to see a simultaneous push to expand and streamline our adoption machinery in this country. There will be a lot of babies born that are not wanted.

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on 5 May 2022, 11:48 last edited by
              #38

              @Mik said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

              Off topic somewhat, but I would like to see a simultaneous push to expand and streamline our adoption machinery in this country. There will be a lot of babies born that are not wanted.

              Sidenote...IIRC, the trigger law in Texas contains $100M for pregnancy assistance, including adoption, in the event of R v W overturn.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              A 1 Reply Last reply 5 May 2022, 14:02
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote on 5 May 2022, 13:55 last edited by
                #39

                Standard IVF practice usually fertilize more eggs than will be implanted into a womb, so if the law defines “life begins at conception” and “conception” is synonymous to “fertilization,” then wouldn’t the standard IVF practice be “premeditated murder” — creating more “lives” than the practitioners know well ahead of time that some will be “die” because a greater-than-zero number of these “lives” will never be implanted?

                1 Reply Last reply
                • J Jolly
                  5 May 2022, 11:48

                  @Mik said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                  Off topic somewhat, but I would like to see a simultaneous push to expand and streamline our adoption machinery in this country. There will be a lot of babies born that are not wanted.

                  Sidenote...IIRC, the trigger law in Texas contains $100M for pregnancy assistance, including adoption, in the event of R v W overturn.

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Aqua Letifer
                  wrote on 5 May 2022, 14:02 last edited by
                  #40

                  @Jolly said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                  @Mik said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                  Off topic somewhat, but I would like to see a simultaneous push to expand and streamline our adoption machinery in this country. There will be a lot of babies born that are not wanted.

                  Sidenote...IIRC, the trigger law in Texas contains $100M for pregnancy assistance, including adoption, in the event of R v W overturn.

                  There were 55,000 abortions in Texas in 2017. So this would amount to about $3500 per person for pregnancy assistance.

                  Compassionate conservatism at work right here, folks!

                  Please love yourself.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote on 5 May 2022, 14:08 last edited by
                    #41

                    The Texas "pregnancy assistance" money only gets released upon triggering by SCOTUS' ruling on Roe v. Wade? Is "pregnancy assistance" not a good idea before SCOTUS rules on Roe v. Wade?

                    H 1 Reply Last reply 5 May 2022, 14:11
                    • A Axtremus
                      5 May 2022, 14:08

                      The Texas "pregnancy assistance" money only gets released upon triggering by SCOTUS' ruling on Roe v. Wade? Is "pregnancy assistance" not a good idea before SCOTUS rules on Roe v. Wade?

                      H Online
                      H Online
                      Horace
                      wrote on 5 May 2022, 14:11 last edited by
                      #42

                      @Axtremus said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                      The Texas "pregnancy assistance" money only gets released upon triggering by SCOTUS' ruling on Roe v. Wade? Is "pregnancy assistance" not a good idea before SCOTUS rules on Roe v. Wade?

                      Where need is greater, assistance is greater. That’s how compassion works.

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on 5 May 2022, 14:35 last edited by
                        #43

                        There is no such fund in the Texas trigger law

                        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                        -Cormac McCarthy

                        J 1 Reply Last reply 5 May 2022, 18:27
                        • J Jolly
                          5 May 2022, 11:45

                          @jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                          I’ve seen estimates that the number of abortions will decrease only by about 10-15% since abortion is more common in states that are abortion friendly.

                          Also read that they are disproportionately obtained by black women.

                          So I’m guessing more black babies in red states is what we should expect.

                          Interesting side note... I've seen where if there were no abortion, the percentage of black people in America would be doubled.

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on 5 May 2022, 16:43 last edited by
                          #44

                          @Jolly said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                          Interesting side note... I've seen where if there were no abortion, the percentage of black people in America would be doubled.

                          Democrats hate black people. They like the votes, but they really hate the people.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • J jon-nyc
                            5 May 2022, 14:35

                            There is no such fund in the Texas trigger law

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on 5 May 2022, 18:27 last edited by
                            #45

                            @jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                            There is no such fund in the Texas trigger law

                            Sorry, I said IIRC. In actuality, they're already spending it...

                            https://www.lifenews.com/2021/09/01/texas-spends-100-million-to-help-pregnant-moms-while-it-protects-babies-from-abortion/

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • J jon-nyc
                              4 May 2022, 22:13

                              Someone once wrote that, at first approximation, middle+ class use birth control, working class use abortion, and the poor use the crib.

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on 8 May 2022, 11:37 last edited by jon-nyc 5 Aug 2022, 11:39
                              #46

                              @jon-nyc said in Fertility clinics in some red states:

                              Someone once wrote that, at first approximation, middle+ class use birth control, working class use abortion, and the poor use the crib.

                              (I don’t think her conclusion follows but I’m posting for the stats)

                              "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                              -Cormac McCarthy

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on 8 May 2022, 12:18 last edited by
                                #47

                                So, babies are killed for convenience and money.

                                Got it.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes

                                42/47

                                5 May 2022, 14:11


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                42 out of 47
                                • First post
                                  42/47
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups