Depp v Heard
-
Never mud wrestled… Jello wrestled, though.
The Brad
-
Never mud wrestled… Jello wrestled, though.
-
Not joking… Freshman year at college was a helluva year…
-
@Horace said in Depp v Heard:
I just learned that Ms Heard was married to a woman for several years before her relationship with Depp.
Heard publicly came out[clarification needed] in 2010, but has stated, "I don't label myself one way or another—I have had successful relationships with men and now a woman. I love who I love; it's the person that matters."[84] In 2018, Heard revealed that she had been warned not to come out as bisexual, as it could negatively impact her career.
Heard was in a relationship with photographer Tasya van Ree from 2008 to 2012. Heard had her last name legally changed to van Ree during the relationship and reverted to her birth name in 2014.[2] In 2009, Heard was arrested in Washington state for misdemeanor domestic violence, after allegedly grabbing van Ree and hitting her arm, but was never charged. The arrest only became public knowledge during Heard's divorce proceedings from actor Johnny Depp in 2016, after which van Ree issued a statement that Heard had been "wrongfully" accused and that the incident had been "misinterpreted and over-sensationalized".
OMG, and then there's this!
Following her divorce from Johnny Depp, Heard dated tech entrepreneur Elon Musk for a year, until early 2018.
@George-K said in Depp v Heard:
@Horace said in Depp v Heard:
I just learned that Ms Heard was married to a woman for several years before her relationship with Depp.
Heard publicly came out[clarification needed] in 2010, but has stated, "I don't label myself one way or another—I have had successful relationships with men and now a woman. I love who I love; it's the person that matters."[84] In 2018, Heard revealed that she had been warned not to come out as bisexual, as it could negatively impact her career.
Heard was in a relationship with photographer Tasya van Ree from 2008 to 2012. Heard had her last name legally changed to van Ree during the relationship and reverted to her birth name in 2014.[2] In 2009, Heard was arrested in Washington state for misdemeanor domestic violence, after allegedly grabbing van Ree and hitting her arm, but was never charged. The arrest only became public knowledge during Heard's divorce proceedings from actor Johnny Depp in 2016, after which van Ree issued a statement that Heard had been "wrongfully" accused and that the incident had been "misinterpreted and over-sensationalized".
OMG, and then there's this!
Following her divorce from Johnny Depp, Heard dated tech entrepreneur Elon Musk for a year, until early 2018.
IOW, she'd fuck a snake if somebody would hold it for her.
-
The witnesses, man.
Link to video
Not only is this guy pure gold, but they kept prodding and prodding to bolster the makeup conspiracy theory, except the one unrelated thing he actually can remember bolsters the prosecution's case.
This is so much better than OJ.
-
Also, "the Bag Lady attorney" is getting some traction, which I'm glad to see.
-
Love how he is vaping (and even driving) during the testimony. I didn't catch it all... who is this dude and why is he driving during this? LOL
@89th said in Depp v Heard:
Love how he is vaping (and even driving) during the testimony. I didn't catch it all... who is this dude and why is he driving during this? LOL
He's the doorman. And I didn't catch why the testimony was recorded remotely; I think he's just not available to be there in person is all.
-
There's any number of YouTube channels that are dealing with this trial.
One of them is "Rekieta Law." He describes himself as a "small town lawyer in central Minnesoooota."
Looking at his YouTube feed, it looks like he's been live-blogging the trial - every day for at least 8 hours a day.
Link to videoSo, you gotta wonder..."You're a small firm in central Minnesooota. How's your practice doing these days?"
He may, or may not be a good lawyer, but if you have the ability to liveblog for all this time, I worry for your business.
-
There's any number of YouTube channels that are dealing with this trial.
One of them is "Rekieta Law." He describes himself as a "small town lawyer in central Minnesoooota."
Looking at his YouTube feed, it looks like he's been live-blogging the trial - every day for at least 8 hours a day.
Link to videoSo, you gotta wonder..."You're a small firm in central Minnesooota. How's your practice doing these days?"
He may, or may not be a good lawyer, but if you have the ability to liveblog for all this time, I worry for your business.
@George-K said in Depp v Heard:
There's any number of YouTube channels that are dealing with this trial.
One of them is "Rekieta Law." He describes himself as a "small town lawyer in central Minnesoooota."
He may, or may not be a good lawyer, but if you have the ability to liveblog for all this time, I worry for your business.
If the first four Google hits on a law office are different social media sites, I don't want him preparing my will.
-
This the tawdriest thing I've seen in a long time.
But what's funny is how Amber Heard is presenting herself to the court, jury and public.
This is pretty much the way she appeared every day during plaintiff's case. Prim, proper, contained and totally in control.
Yesterday, Depp's team rested. This morning was taken up by a forensic psychologist testifying about her evaluations of Heard.
This afternoon, Heard took the stand, and this is how she looks.
LOL.
-
There is a clear performative aspect with those two even while they're not on the stand. Depp was smirking and giggling and whispering the whole time his case was being presented. I think that is mostly for effect, for the jury. And of course for the viewing public, who he would like to win over maybe more than the jury, in support of his career.
Education is extremely important.
-
There is a clear performative aspect with those two even while they're not on the stand. Depp was smirking and giggling and whispering the whole time his case was being presented. I think that is mostly for effect, for the jury. And of course for the viewing public, who he would like to win over maybe more than the jury, in support of his career.
Mrs Phibes thinks he’s lovely.
Which is slightly aggravating. I’d never get away with the shit he pulls.
-
Mrs Phibes thinks he’s lovely.
Which is slightly aggravating. I’d never get away with the shit he pulls.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Depp v Heard:
Mrs Phibes thinks he’s lovely.
Mrs. George agrees.
Sentiment seems to be against her, at the moment. However, public sentiment usually has little to do with the law.
I wouldn't be surprised to see him lose.
OTOH, I really wonder if this is about the money, rather than restoring his reputation. Even if he loses in court, winning in the court of public opinion might be enough to resurrect his career.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Depp v Heard:
Mrs Phibes thinks he’s lovely.
Mrs. George agrees.
Sentiment seems to be against her, at the moment. However, public sentiment usually has little to do with the law.
I wouldn't be surprised to see him lose.
OTOH, I really wonder if this is about the money, rather than restoring his reputation. Even if he loses in court, winning in the court of public opinion might be enough to resurrect his career.
@George-K said in Depp v Heard:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Depp v Heard:
Mrs Phibes thinks he’s lovely.
Mrs. George agrees.
Sentiment seems to be against her, at the moment. However, public sentiment usually has little to do with the law.
I wouldn't be surprised to see him lose.
OTOH, I really wonder if this is about the money, rather than restoring his reputation. Even if he loses in court, winning in the court of public opinion might be enough to resurrect his career.
What's funny, and quite encouraging, is that I don't find Amber Heard attractive in the slightest.
Or maybe I'm just getting old in my old age.
