Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President
-
wrote on 20 Jan 2022, 20:23 last edited by jon-nyc
-
wrote on 20 Jan 2022, 20:24 last edited by
-
wrote on 20 Jan 2022, 22:56 last edited by
I would pay good money (not a lot of money, of course, but it would be good) to see whom Hannity lumps in with the crazy people.
Flynn?
The Kraken-wrangler?
-
wrote on 20 Jan 2022, 23:25 last edited by
I’m sure Lin Wood and the pillow guy too.
The question is whether he included Giuliani in that list.
-
I’m sure Lin Wood and the pillow guy too.
The question is whether he included Giuliani in that list.
wrote on 20 Jan 2022, 23:34 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
The question is whether he included Giuliani in that list.
Trial-by-combat Giuliani feels like he's past the 'best-by' date.
-
I’m sure Lin Wood and the pillow guy too.
The question is whether he included Giuliani in that list.
-
I’m sure Lin Wood and the pillow guy too.
The question is whether he included Giuliani in that list.
wrote on 21 Jan 2022, 02:23 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
I’m sure Lin Wood and the pillow guy too.
Yeah I figured the pillow guy was a clear example of a "crazy" Hannity was referring to.
-
wrote on 21 Jan 2022, 09:50 last edited by
I find it interesting and a little scary how involved Hanity seemed to be in the daily business off Trump.
-
wrote on 21 Jan 2022, 10:15 last edited by jon-nyc
Tucker even more so.
The dog that didn’t bark - we’ve seen the texts of other big Fox names because they texted White House staff during and after 1/6. But not Tucker. No doubt that means he was texting directly with the president, not staff
-
Tucker even more so.
The dog that didn’t bark - we’ve seen the texts of other big Fox names because they texted White House staff during and after 1/6. But not Tucker. No doubt that means he was texting directly with the president, not staff
wrote on 21 Jan 2022, 11:22 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
Tucker even more so.
The dog that didn’t bark - we’ve seen the texts of other big Fox names because they texted White House staff during and after 1/6. But not Tucker. No doubt that means he was texting directly with the president, not staff
You think?
I don't watch American TV, but my impression from the news was that Hannity and Trump was a true love relation, whereas Tucker kept a little bit of distance.
-
wrote on 21 Jan 2022, 12:13 last edited by
It's obviously speculation but he definitely was capable of influencing him, there was a lot of reporting about how a Tucker visit to Mar-al-lago early in the pandemic changed the way Trump was reacting to it.
-
It's obviously speculation but he definitely was capable of influencing him, there was a lot of reporting about how a Tucker visit to Mar-al-lago early in the pandemic changed the way Trump was reacting to it.
wrote on 22 Jan 2022, 13:37 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
there was a lot of reporting about how
There was also a lot of reporting about how Trump was a Russian asset, all of which proved to be false.
I don't put a lot of stock on "the reporting". I'll wait for the facts to come out before jumping to a conclusion about Tucker's influence on Trump.
You know.... like the recent NPR "reporting" about the Supremes and masking, which caused three Supremes to issue statements calling NPR "reporting" bullshit.
-
wrote on 22 Jan 2022, 16:31 last edited by
NPR... just say you screwed up and move on. BUT NO!!!
Double down... bad word choice, my ass.
-
wrote on 22 Jan 2022, 16:42 last edited by
Which is why NPR needs no public monies.
-
@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
there was a lot of reporting about how
There was also a lot of reporting about how Trump was a Russian asset, all of which proved to be false.
I don't put a lot of stock on "the reporting". I'll wait for the facts to come out before jumping to a conclusion about Tucker's influence on Trump.
You know.... like the recent NPR "reporting" about the Supremes and masking, which caused three Supremes to issue statements calling NPR "reporting" bullshit.
wrote on 22 Jan 2022, 18:24 last edited by Renauda@improviso said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
There was also a lot of reporting about how Trump was a Russian asset, all of which proved to be false.
I was wondering why Trump has been mum lately on the current Russian threat to Ukraine.
-
wrote on 24 Jan 2022, 00:18 last edited by
@renauda said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
@improviso said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
There was also a lot of reporting about how Trump was a Russian asset, all of which proved to be false.
I was wondering why Trump has been mum lately on the current Russian threat to Ukraine.
When your opponent is in the process of cutting his own throat, don't get I his way....
-
@renauda said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
@improviso said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
@jon-nyc said in Hannity to WH: Keep the crazy people away from the President:
There was also a lot of reporting about how Trump was a Russian asset, all of which proved to be false.
I was wondering why Trump has been mum lately on the current Russian threat to Ukraine.
When your opponent is in the process of cutting his own throat, don't get I his way....
