You say you want a revolution?
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 16:23 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 16:26 last edited by
The silly pink knit hat brigade will strike terror into the hearts of their enemies.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 16:37 last edited by Mik
That's stupid. You can't 'outlaw Roe v Wade'. It's not a law. t's a ruling. It can be overturned, but not outlawed. One might expect a senator would understand that.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 17:59 last edited by
Bring it, shithead.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 18:01 last edited by
In the end, the Feds have no business regulating abortion, other than a viability law. Leave it up to the states.
-
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 19:00 last edited by
After the young people have their revolution, you can ask the babies who weren't murdered what they think about it.
-
In the end, the Feds have no business regulating abortion, other than a viability law. Leave it up to the states.
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 19:05 last edited by@jolly said in You say you want a revolution?:
In the end, the Feds have no business regulating abortion, other than a viability law. Leave it up to the states.
Yup, basically. Almost a perfect scenario for when something should be regulated at the state level.
-
That's stupid. You can't 'outlaw Roe v Wade'. It's not a law. t's a ruling. It can be overturned, but not outlawed. One might expect a senator would understand that.
wrote on 30 Nov 2021, 19:05 last edited by@mik said in You say you want a revolution?:
That's stupid. You can't 'outlaw Roe v Wade'. It's not a law. t's a ruling. It can be overturned, but not outlawed. One might expect a senator would understand that.
I know, it hurts my head that such a thing is not obvious to the senator.