Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
280 Posts 17 Posters 7.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Screen Shot 2021-11-08 at 1.28.52 PM.png

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG George K referenced this topic on
    • JollyJ Jolly

      Kid's a dumbass, but he should walk. It's clearly self-defense.

      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      @jolly said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence:

      Kid's a dumbass, but he should walk. It's clearly self-defense.

      Yes on all three counts

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Jolly

        Kid's a dumbass, but he should walk. It's clearly self-defense.

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        @jolly said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence:

        he should walk.

        Couple of possible charges that might stick (I actually don't know if he was charged with these):

        1. He was 17 at the time - I think it's illegal to own a long rifle at that age.

        2. He transported it across state lines.

        https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/aug/28/facebook-posts/did-kyle-rittenhouse-break-law-carrying-assault-st/

        Rittenhouse stands accused of shooting the protesters. Since his lawyer has said that Rittenhouse obtained the assault-style rifle from a friend in Wisconsin (meaning that he didn’t transport it with him from Illinois), we’re going to focus on the second half of the claim — that it was "perfectly legal" for the teenager to carry a firearm in Kenosha.

        Is that true? State laws suggest not.

        The Wisconsin Department of Justice honors concealed carry permits issued in Illinois. But Rittenhouse did not have a permit to begin with, and he was not legally old enough to carry a firearm in Wisconsin.

        In Illinois, concealed carry applicants must be at least 21 years old. Since Rittenhouse is 17, he would not qualify for a permit. In Wisconsin, it is legal for adults to carry firearms in public without a license if the gun is visible. However, to open carry, you must be at least 18 years old.

        Wisconsin law stipulates that "any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor." On Aug. 27, prosecutors charged Rittenhouse with a misdemeanor count of possession of a dangerous weapon under the age of 18, according to court records.

        John Monroe, an attorney who specializes in gun rights, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that there’s an exception for rifles and shotguns, which is aimed at letting children ages 16 and 17 hunt, that could apply. But Rittenhouse wasn’t in Kenosha to hunt.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by Jolly
          #17

          The exception still applies. Transporting across state lines is a problem. Justice could charge him under Federal law, but if they do this after an acquittal, it would certainly have political fallout.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            It's a shame that Lin Wood turned out to be such a whacko. After his success with Nick Sandmann, he would be salivating after what's been said about Rittenhouse. Rep Ilhan Omar (D-Incest) called him a "domestic terrorist" who "executed people."

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Ain't hard to follow a blueprint...

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                https://dailycaller.com/2021/11/09/wisconsin-kyle-rittenhouse-witness-trial-prosecutor-statement/

                A key witness for the prosecution in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial testified Tuesday that he was asked to change his statement by the prosecution team.

                Nathan DeBruin was taking photographs of the events the night that Rittenhouse killed two protestors and injured another, according to WISN.

                Prosecutor Thomas Binger asked DeBruin to identify a person in a picture, according to DeBruin’s testimony.

                When DeBruin didn’t know who the person was, Binger allegedly identified the person as Joshua Zaminsky.

                Binger then set the phone face down before showing the photo again to DeBruin. He then asked a second time to identify the person in the picture.

                “I just felt, I didn’t want to change my statement,” DeBruin told the defense attorney.

                After being asked by Binger to change his statement, DeBruin told the defense team he hired an attorney.

                Prosecutor James Kraus then began cross-examining the witness about his statement to police on the night of the shooting.

                “We asked if you knew anything beyond that statement,” Kraus asked.

                “Correct,” DeBruin responded.

                “We didn’t ask you to change it?” the prosecutor then asked.

                “Yes, yes you did,” DeBruin told the prosecutor.

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Surely, the DA is tanking on purpose. Nobody can be that inept unless they try. Hard.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG George K

                    @taiwan_girl said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence:

                    I hesitate to bring "race" to this forum thread, but there was a recent article I saw.

                    From what I understand, after all of the shooting incidents, he walked past police carrying a rifle (or machine) gun, with people shouting that he had just shot people. Even with all that, he basically left the scene and went home.

                    No, he did not have a "machine" gun. He had a semi-automatic rifle. That's an important distinction. Fully automatic weapons (ie "machine guns") are almost impossible to get in the United States.

                    He did not go home, he told Illinois police and said that he had shot someone.

                    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kenosha-protesters-killed-teen-kyle-rittenhouse-police-report/

                    A visibly upset 17-year-old accused of fatally shooting two demonstrators in Wisconsin told officers at his local police station in Illinois where to find an assault rifle he said he had used just two hours earlier to shoot several people, according to police records.

                    Kyle Rittenhouse cycled through a range of emotions, crying and vomiting several times, as he described to police what happened late on August 25 after he traveled to Kenosha, ostensibly to protect businesses from protesters following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man, Antioch Police Department records show.

                    "I shot two White kids," Rittenhouse said, adding that he had "ended a man's life."

                    And, from what the video says, he fired in self defense, after someone shot at him.

                    He shot (and killed) two white guys. Why bring race into it at all?

                    Don't get me wrong. This kid was an idiot, and what he did, bringing a weapon to Kenosha, which was probably illegal, is wrong.

                    But, that's not what the prosecution alleges. They're accusing him of murder.

                    First degree murder.

                    And the video shows something very different.

                    Why did it take over a year for this to be seen?

                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    @george-k said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                    Why did it take over a year for this to be seen?

                    Isn’t he being tried by the state, not the Feds? Does the FBI have some responsibility to monitor all state prosecutions and provide evidence for one side or the other if they have it?

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      @george-k said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                      Why did it take over a year for this to be seen?

                      Isn’t he being tried by the state, not the Feds? Does the FBI have some responsibility to monitor all state prosecutions and provide evidence for one side or the other if they have it?

                      George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      @jon-nyc said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                      @george-k said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                      Why did it take over a year for this to be seen?

                      Isn’t he being tried by the state, not the Feds? Does the FBI have some responsibility to monitor all state prosecutions and provide evidence for one side or the other if they have it?

                      Good questions.

                      First of all, there is video that was provided to the prosecution. I don't know the circumstances of that transfer of evidence. Once that happens, however, the defense has the right to see it.

                      Secondly, why was the FBI flying drones (and, apparently, an airplane) at the scene to begin with? Is this SOP? Did they do this in Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis?

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                        @jolly said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence:

                        Kid's a dumbass, but he should walk. It's clearly self-defense.

                        Yes on all three counts

                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        @jon-nyc said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                        @jolly said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence:

                        Kid's a dumbass, but he should walk. It's clearly self-defense.

                        Yes on all three counts

                        You and @Jolly forgot to mention that he was pretty damn solid, too. Debate all you want about whether he should have been there, but when the shit went down? Solid. I mean, there should be recruiters from the SEALS and Rangers waiting to talk to this kid in hallway.

                        The Brad

                        89th8 jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                          @george-k I agree with what you say. No opinion (at this point) on self defense/murder, etc

                          My point was that if he were black, I do not believe that he could have walked past the police carrying a gun, with people telling the police he had shot people, and then he just continued on and returned to his hometown.

                          The police did not stop him, did not detain him, etc.

                          Just a random perspective. 🙂

                          MikM Offline
                          MikM Offline
                          Mik
                          wrote on last edited by Mik
                          #25

                          @taiwan_girl said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                          @george-k I agree with what you say. No opinion (at this point) on self defense/murder, etc

                          My point was that if he were black, I do not believe that he could have walked past the police carrying a gun, with people telling the police he had shot people, and then he just continued on and returned to his hometown.

                          The police did not stop him, did not detain him, etc.

                          Just a random perspective. 🙂

                          So what? You believe? I wonder if they would have stopped a unicorn with a gun? Oh, wait..a unicorn can't carry a weapon. That has as much relevance to this situation.

                          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                          HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                          • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                            @jon-nyc said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                            @jolly said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence:

                            Kid's a dumbass, but he should walk. It's clearly self-defense.

                            Yes on all three counts

                            You and @Jolly forgot to mention that he was pretty damn solid, too. Debate all you want about whether he should have been there, but when the shit went down? Solid. I mean, there should be recruiters from the SEALS and Rangers waiting to talk to this kid in hallway.

                            89th8 Offline
                            89th8 Offline
                            89th
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            @lufins-dad said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                            @jon-nyc said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                            @jolly said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence:

                            Kid's a dumbass, but he should walk. It's clearly self-defense.

                            Yes on all three counts

                            You and @Jolly forgot to mention that he was pretty damn solid, too. Debate all you want about whether he should have been there, but when the shit went down? Solid. I mean, there should be recruiters from the SEALS and Rangers waiting to talk to this kid in hallway.

                            Agreed, I found a nice summary video of what happened (about 3 minutes long) and was impressed he came out of that alive. I wish I could find it again, if I do I'll post it here. It makes the order of events pretty clear and removes bias (as much as one allows).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • MikM Mik

                              @taiwan_girl said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                              @george-k I agree with what you say. No opinion (at this point) on self defense/murder, etc

                              My point was that if he were black, I do not believe that he could have walked past the police carrying a gun, with people telling the police he had shot people, and then he just continued on and returned to his hometown.

                              The police did not stop him, did not detain him, etc.

                              Just a random perspective. 🙂

                              So what? You believe? I wonder if they would have stopped a unicorn with a gun? Oh, wait..a unicorn can't carry a weapon. That has as much relevance to this situation.

                              HoraceH Offline
                              HoraceH Offline
                              Horace
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              @mik said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                              @taiwan_girl said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                              @george-k I agree with what you say. No opinion (at this point) on self defense/murder, etc

                              My point was that if he were black, I do not believe that he could have walked past the police carrying a gun, with people telling the police he had shot people, and then he just continued on and returned to his hometown.

                              The police did not stop him, did not detain him, etc.

                              Just a random perspective. 🙂

                              So what? You believe? I wonder if they would have stopped a unicorn with a gun? Oh, wait..a unicorn can't carry a weapon. That has as much relevance to this situation.

                              TG has a theory that black people are treated worse than white people in America.

                              It’s about time someone spoke up about this.

                              Education is extremely important.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                Aqua Letifer
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                How is this trial still going on? How is this in any way not a total joke at this point?

                                Please love yourself.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • MikM Offline
                                  MikM Offline
                                  Mik
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  Because of potential riots. Chicago has cancelled police days off this weekend, cops are not happy about it.

                                  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/as-kyle-rittenhouse-verdict-upheaval-nears-chicago-police-cancel-days-off/ar-AAQx3Go?ocid=msedgntp

                                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • HoraceH Offline
                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    Horace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    We need to get this out of our system. We need a just acquittal, and we need some temper tantrum riots that'll set an example that imbecilic outrage is no longer an acceptable reason to destroy city blocks.

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • MikM Mik

                                      Because of potential riots. Chicago has cancelled police days off this weekend, cops are not happy about it.

                                      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/as-kyle-rittenhouse-verdict-upheaval-nears-chicago-police-cancel-days-off/ar-AAQx3Go?ocid=msedgntp

                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins Dad
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @mik said in The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence - The Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Kenosha:

                                      Because of potential riots. Chicago has cancelled police days off this weekend, cops are not happy about it.

                                      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/as-kyle-rittenhouse-verdict-upheaval-nears-chicago-police-cancel-days-off/ar-AAQx3Go?ocid=msedgntp

                                      You mean the department that is understaffed due to their vaccine mandate?

                                      The Brad

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • JollyJ Offline
                                        JollyJ Offline
                                        Jolly
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        The Alternate Universe...

                                        https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/as-rittenhouse-trial-goes-wrong-media-retreat-to-alternate-universe/ar-AAQvP7z?ocid=msedgntp

                                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • LarryL Offline
                                          LarryL Offline
                                          Larry
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          The judge just ordered the jury out of the room and is ripping the prosecutor a new asshole.

                                          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups