Not so fast...

[Mik]

They had to expect this, but hoping to get more people vaccinated before it got shut down. I never believed it would be truly implemented.

[George K]

Lyin' Joe:

Link to video

[LuFins Dad]

@george-k said in Not so fast...:

Lyin' Joe:

Link to video

This post has been deemed to contain misleading and false information due to shut up.

[George K]

@lufins-dad said in Not so fast...:

This post has been deemed to contain misleading and false information due to shut up.

Does that mean I go to TNCR jail?

[LuFins Dad]

@george-k said in Not so fast...:

@lufins-dad said in Not so fast...:

This post has been deemed to contain misleading and false information due to shut up.

Does that mean I go to TNCR jail?

No need to go all Meta on on us…

[taiwan_girl]

In my opinion, I think most big big companies will continue to have move "forward" with requiring vaccines.

Maybe some of the smaller sized companies will delay while waiting for final court resolution.

[LuFins Dad]

@taiwan_girl said in Not so fast...:

In my opinion, I think most big big companies will continue to have move "forward" with requiring vaccines.

Maybe some of the smaller sized companies will delay while waiting for final court resolution.

I don’t think most companies really give a rat patootie about their employees vaccination status and will only truly comply when there’s no choice.

There will be a few big companies that will comply just because the vaxxed screaming idiots are louder than the unvax screaming idiots.

[Copper]

@lufins-dad said in Not so fast...:

There will be a few big companies that will comply just because the vaxxed screaming idiots are louder than the unvax screaming idiots.

Sadly, that is true

If it was my big company I would mandate the vax for people that are worth keeping. I would let the second string skip it.

[taiwan_girl]

@lufins-dad said in Not so fast...:

@taiwan_girl said in Not so fast...:

In my opinion, I think most big big companies will continue to have move "forward" with requiring vaccines.

Maybe some of the smaller sized companies will delay while waiting for final court resolution.

I don’t think most companies really give a rat patootie about their employees vaccination status and will only truly comply when there’s no choice.

There will be a few big companies that will comply just because the vaxxed screaming idiots are louder than the unvax screaming idiots.

I guess my thinking is that most big companies (and I am thinking of Fortune 500 companies) already have plans and procedures in place. Big companies hate uncertainty. So, rather than stop any vacciation plans and then 3 or 4 months later having to restart them again, (and maybe stop again), I think they will just continue as is. If in the future, the vaccine/testing requirements are not allowed, maybe they will quietly drop their own requirements.

[Mik]

Disagree. Continuing to press vaccination now that the requirement has been stopped opens them up to liability if it gets squashed permanently. I think they will quietly stall for the moment. Saw a number of protests outside buildings this week.

[Horace]

Like anything pop culture, such as variations of wokeness or pro-vax zealotry, large corporations, whose customers are denizens of pop culture, will make their decisions entirely on their actuarial computations of how it affects their business value.

[Mik]

Short of an existential threat, that’s as it should be.

[Horace]

Part of the corporate calculation is how zealous the culture will be in canceling them if they do not conform. That zealotry is part of the culture. We've even given our current zealotry a name - cancel culture. A term left-leaning souls will reliably scoff at. Cancel culture is neither as it must be nor as it should be. Pop cultural whims don't need to dictate how individuals at corporations choose to behave. You can lay that notion directly at the feet of our progressive-dominated culture.

"But Trump", say your local TDS suffering centrists.

[jon-nyc]

@george-k Did you watch the video you posted? He said he wouldn’t mandate vaccines for all Americans. Has he reneged on that?

[LuFins Dad]

@jon-nyc said in Not so fast...:

@george-k Did you watch the video you posted? He said he wouldn’t mandate vaccines for all Americans. Has he reneged on that?

We get it, Jon. He hasn’t mandated employers of a certain size force vaccinations, but instead mandated they require vaccination OR an onerous and expensive testing requirement that will result in them likely just pursuing a vaccine requirement. That is so much better.

[Jolly]

NOBODY that I've heard of, is doing the testing - they went straight to mandate.

Also, the rumor is that the Brandon Administration already has plans to mandate 50-99 employee businesses in the near future.

[Copper]

I thought that if you worked for a company with fewer than 100 employees, the virus won't bother you.

[Jolly]

Nah, that number only works for protests and Democrat fund-raising events.

[Mik]

@jolly said in Not so fast...:

NOBODY that I've heard of, is doing the testing - they went straight to mandate.

As if it wasn't obvious that they would. Let's see, do I want to make the employees get a free vaccination or do I want to pay for weekly testing?

[Jolly]

@mik said in Not so fast...:

@jolly said in Not so fast...:

NOBODY that I've heard of, is doing the testing - they went straight to mandate.

As if it wasn't obvious that they would. Let's see, do I want to make the employees get a free vaccination or do I want to pay for weekly testing?

Correct.

Those who argued there was a loophole in the mandated vax we're just blowing smoke ...