Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Fortress Notes

Fortress Notes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
5 Posts 4 Posters 59 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/2021/10/08/the-boeing-b-17-flying-fortress-was-outdated-when-wwii-began/

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      What a fascinating read. Thanks!

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girl
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Agree. Cool article

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          What got me is how the B-17 was not really of a great airplane.

          Yeah, it was durable, because of the large areas of the wing and tail.

          But was it more *surviable" than its contemporaries?

          Look at todays A-10. What a remarkable aircraft - it's an airplane built around a tank, basically. The B-17 was not that, LOL.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG George K

            What got me is how the B-17 was not really of a great airplane.

            Yeah, it was durable, because of the large areas of the wing and tail.

            But was it more *surviable" than its contemporaries?

            Look at todays A-10. What a remarkable aircraft - it's an airplane built around a tank, basically. The B-17 was not that, LOL.

            CopperC Offline
            CopperC Offline
            Copper
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @george-k said in Fortress Notes:

            But was it more *surviable" than its contemporaries?

            I think life was cheap. It is hard to imagine how cheap by today's standards.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups