Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. "Stealthing"

"Stealthing"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
8 Posts 7 Posters 58 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    California is the 1st state to ban 'stealthing,' nonconsensual condom removal

    California just became the first state in the U.S. to outlaw "stealthing," a slang term for the nonconsensual removal of a condom during sex.

    The law, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday, makes it a civil offense under state law for someone to remove a condom without their partner's consent.

    "For a majority of the people, it's like, 'Yeah, it makes sense that this is immoral and it should be illegal,' " state Assembly member Cristina Garcia, who sponsored the legislation, told NPR.

    "A lot of people told me, 'I can't believe it's not already illegal,' " she added.

    The California State Legislature had approved the measure without opposition.

    Putting aside all the touchy-feely stuff at the end of the article, the law, on its face, makes sense. If you consent to sex with your partner, with the caveat that he (can I say "he"?) wear a condom, removal of the condom is a violation of that consent.

    Also, what kind of asshole (can I say "asshole"?) would do that anyway.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3
      wrote on last edited by Catseye3
      #2

      So a vindictive woman bent on paybacks saves a used condom, and the next time the paybacked victim has bare sex (consented to) with her, she hauls out the condom and calls the cops.

      Other than that, what could go wrong?

      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

      George KG AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
      • Catseye3C Catseye3

        So a vindictive woman bent on paybacks saves a used condom, and the next time the paybacked victim has bare sex (consented to) with her, she hauls out the condom and calls the cops.

        Other than that, what could go wrong?

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @catseye3 said in "Stealthing":

        So a vindictive woman bent on paybacks saves a used condom, and the next time the paybacked victim has bare sex (consented to) with her, she hauls out the condom and calls the cops.

        Good point: She said, he said...

        Another good point: #believeallwimmenz

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          @catseye3 said in "Stealthing":

          So a vindictive woman bent on paybacks saves a used condom, and the next time the paybacked victim has bare sex (consented to) with her, she hauls out the condom and calls the cops.

          Good point: She said, he said...

          Another good point: #believeallwimmenz

          CopperC Offline
          CopperC Offline
          Copper
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @george-k said in "Stealthing":

          Good point: She said, he said...

          Stop right there

          1 Reply Last reply
          • Catseye3C Catseye3

            So a vindictive woman bent on paybacks saves a used condom, and the next time the paybacked victim has bare sex (consented to) with her, she hauls out the condom and calls the cops.

            Other than that, what could go wrong?

            AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @catseye3 said in "Stealthing":

            So a vindictive woman bent on paybacks saves a used condom, and the next time the paybacked victim has bare sex (consented to) with her, she hauls out the condom and calls the cops.

            Other than that, what could go wrong?

            The solution is simple: sign an agreement before you do anything.

            Link to video

            1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Hard law to enforce, or prove after the fact.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • bachophileB Offline
                bachophileB Offline
                bachophile
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                That's what being a Protestant's all about. That's
                why it's the church for me. That's why it's the church for
                anyone who respects the individual and the individual's right
                to decide for him or herself. When Martin Luther nailed his
                protest up to the church door in 1517, he may not have
                realised the full significance of what he was doing. But four
                hundred years later, thanks to him, my dear, I can wear
                whatever I want on my John Thomas. And Protestantism doesn't
                stop at the simple condom. Oh no! I can wear French Ticklers
                if I want.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Those same folks that wanted the government out of the bedroom, suddenly want them back in?

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups