Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Spying?

Spying?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
153 Posts 13 Posters 3.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Online
    HoraceH Online
    Horace
    wrote on last edited by Horace
    #142

    Loki considers himself to have established beyond any shadow of a doubt his own objectivity in all things political. Thus when he becomes righteously indignant over politically charged issues, it is the indignance of objectivity - and he does not countenance the existence of any reasonable opposition to that. That is, of course, how all righteousness works. That's what that emotion does to the human mind.

    Education is extremely important.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      Loki considers himself to have established beyond any shadow of a doubt his own objectivity in all things political. Thus when he becomes righteously indignant over politically charged issues, it is the indignance of objectivity - and he does not countenance the existence of any reasonable opposition to that. That is, of course, how all righteousness works. That's what that emotion does to the human mind.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Loki
      wrote on last edited by Loki
      #143

      @horace said in Spying?:

      Loki considers himself to have established beyond any shadow of a doubt his own objectivity in all things political. Thus when he becomes righteously indignant over politically charged issues, it is the indignancy of objectivity - and he does not countenance the existence of any reasonable opposition to that. That is, of course, how all righteousness works. That's what that emotion does to the human mind.

      I’ve provided very reasonable approaches to understanding the nature of TuCa’s allegations. Unfortunately TuCa only makes allegations with no evidence at all and even his employer won’t back him up. How I am on thin ice is really quite fascinating. TuCa and many here demand a response from the NSA, but quizzingly make no such demand of the employer.

      I would submit demanding the NSA respond when his employer won’t more aptly fits righteousness.

      Somehow this unknown whistleblower who no one has ever talked to and emails that have never been shared are more important than sources that CNN is standing behind. I suspect more to come from this…TuCa, next move is yours.

      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
      • Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor Phibes
        wrote on last edited by
        #144

        I think it's very possible that either the NSA or Tucker Carlson are completely full of shit regarding this story.

        You guys are very quick to believe the media when it suits you. I know, I know, Tucker isn't part of the dreadful media that make shit up all the time. He's a Truth Teller.

        I don't trust the government or Tucker.

        I was only joking

        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

          I think it's very possible that either the NSA or Tucker Carlson are completely full of shit regarding this story.

          You guys are very quick to believe the media when it suits you. I know, I know, Tucker isn't part of the dreadful media that make shit up all the time. He's a Truth Teller.

          I don't trust the government or Tucker.

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #145

          @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

          I think it's very possible that either the NSA or Tucker Carlson are completely full of shit regarding this story.

          You guys are very quick to believe the media when it suits you. I know, I know, Tucker isn't part of the dreadful media that make shit up all the time. He's a Truth Teller.

          I don't trust the government or Tucker.

          Which is fine. But Tucker is talking about something that has happened multiple times over the past few years, to multiple people, generally of the same political bent.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

            I think it's very possible that either the NSA or Tucker Carlson are completely full of shit regarding this story.

            You guys are very quick to believe the media when it suits you. I know, I know, Tucker isn't part of the dreadful media that make shit up all the time. He's a Truth Teller.

            I don't trust the government or Tucker.

            Which is fine. But Tucker is talking about something that has happened multiple times over the past few years, to multiple people, generally of the same political bent.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Loki
            wrote on last edited by
            #146

            @jolly said in Spying?:

            @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

            I think it's very possible that either the NSA or Tucker Carlson are completely full of shit regarding this story.

            You guys are very quick to believe the media when it suits you. I know, I know, Tucker isn't part of the dreadful media that make shit up all the time. He's a Truth Teller.

            I don't trust the government or Tucker.

            Which is fine. But Tucker is talking about something that has happened multiple times over the past few years, to multiple people, generally of the same political bent.

            I agree 100% with what you said. Now if only his employer would back him up or some evidence is shared I’m on board for the ride.

            George KG 1 Reply Last reply
            • L Loki

              @jolly said in Spying?:

              @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

              I think it's very possible that either the NSA or Tucker Carlson are completely full of shit regarding this story.

              You guys are very quick to believe the media when it suits you. I know, I know, Tucker isn't part of the dreadful media that make shit up all the time. He's a Truth Teller.

              I don't trust the government or Tucker.

              Which is fine. But Tucker is talking about something that has happened multiple times over the past few years, to multiple people, generally of the same political bent.

              I agree 100% with what you said. Now if only his employer would back him up or some evidence is shared I’m on board for the ride.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #147

              @loki said in Spying?:

              Now if only his employer would back him

              You're obviously convinced that Fox's silence on the matter lends credence to one being skeptical of TuCa's comments.

              I'm not sure that's a valid criticism.

              If you say something, and your boss is silent on the issue, does that make your statement false? Because that's what you're implying, but not really saying.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG George K

                @loki said in Spying?:

                Now if only his employer would back him

                You're obviously convinced that Fox's silence on the matter lends credence to one being skeptical of TuCa's comments.

                I'm not sure that's a valid criticism.

                If you say something, and your boss is silent on the issue, does that make your statement false? Because that's what you're implying, but not really saying.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Loki
                wrote on last edited by
                #148

                @george-k said in Spying?:

                @loki said in Spying?:

                Now if only his employer would back him

                You're obviously convinced that Fox's silence on the matter lends credence to one being skeptical of TuCa's comments.

                I'm not sure that's a valid criticism.

                If you say something, and your boss is silent on the issue, does that make your statement false? Because that's what you're implying, but not really saying.

                I just think TuCa is reaching and FOX hasn’t seen enough to run with a story.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  @jolly lol

                  Perhaps if you were a bit less ideologically committed you’d recognize the simple fact that anyone who’s job it is to be sensational 5 days a week is going to, shall we say, cut a lot of corners.

                  Especially when the suits at his network admit it outright in lawsuits brought about by just such corner-cutting.

                  LarryL Offline
                  LarryL Offline
                  Larry
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #149

                  @jon-nyc said in Spying?:

                  @jolly lol

                  Perhaps if you were a bit less ideologically committed you’d recognize the simple fact that anyone who’s job it is to be sensational 5 days a week is going to, shall we say, cut a lot of corners.

                  Especially when the suits at his network admit it outright in lawsuits brought about by just such corner-cutting.

                  Oh, really......

                  Tell me... have they done this to Don Lemon, Have they done this to ANY of the leftwing media personalities whose job it is to, and I quote.. "be sensational 5 days a week"? There IS one big difference between what Carlson says that you call being "sensational" and what the left wing media types say that is also "sensational..... the "sensational" things Carlson says always get proven to be true, while every. Single. Thing. Said that's "sensationa" by the leftwing equivalents always turn out to not just be untrue, but in most cases downright lies .

                  So when you can show where even one of them are being treated the same way, you might need to accept the fact that it is you that is committed to an ideology, not Jolly.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • L Loki

                    @horace said in Spying?:

                    Loki considers himself to have established beyond any shadow of a doubt his own objectivity in all things political. Thus when he becomes righteously indignant over politically charged issues, it is the indignancy of objectivity - and he does not countenance the existence of any reasonable opposition to that. That is, of course, how all righteousness works. That's what that emotion does to the human mind.

                    I’ve provided very reasonable approaches to understanding the nature of TuCa’s allegations. Unfortunately TuCa only makes allegations with no evidence at all and even his employer won’t back him up. How I am on thin ice is really quite fascinating. TuCa and many here demand a response from the NSA, but quizzingly make no such demand of the employer.

                    I would submit demanding the NSA respond when his employer won’t more aptly fits righteousness.

                    Somehow this unknown whistleblower who no one has ever talked to and emails that have never been shared are more important than sources that CNN is standing behind. I suspect more to come from this…TuCa, next move is yours.

                    HoraceH Online
                    HoraceH Online
                    Horace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #150

                    @loki said in Spying?:

                    @horace said in Spying?:

                    Loki considers himself to have established beyond any shadow of a doubt his own objectivity in all things political. Thus when he becomes righteously indignant over politically charged issues, it is the indignancy of objectivity - and he does not countenance the existence of any reasonable opposition to that. That is, of course, how all righteousness works. That's what that emotion does to the human mind.

                    I’ve provided very reasonable approaches to understanding the nature of TuCa’s allegations. Unfortunately TuCa only makes allegations with no evidence at all and even his employer won’t back him up. How I am on thin ice is really quite fascinating. TuCa and many here demand a response from the NSA, but quizzingly make no such demand of the employer.

                    I would submit demanding the NSA respond when his employer won’t more aptly fits righteousness.

                    Somehow this unknown whistleblower who no one has ever talked to and emails that have never been shared are more important than sources that CNN is standing behind. I suspect more to come from this…TuCa, next move is yours.

                    You can call me deluded if I think it's likely there is something interesting, and awkward for the NSA, to this story. That is in fact what I think. You think it's a bunch of hot air from a sensationalist talking head. Fine. That's a reasonable disagreement. But your schtick about how you're an island of sanity surrounded by nutcases untethered to reality is getting old. You're on that kick with a few different topics now. About the only difference I've noticed is how you've become a Full Stop moralist lately. Anybody not getting the vaccine is a social cancer Full Stop. Anybody not emoting about the existential next level destruction of the social fabric on January 6 is in full denial of reality Full Stop. Anybody who thinks Carson's story has some meat to it is a hypocritical tribalist Full Stop. Did I miss one? I think I may have.

                    Education is extremely important.

                    L Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
                    • HoraceH Horace

                      @loki said in Spying?:

                      @horace said in Spying?:

                      Loki considers himself to have established beyond any shadow of a doubt his own objectivity in all things political. Thus when he becomes righteously indignant over politically charged issues, it is the indignancy of objectivity - and he does not countenance the existence of any reasonable opposition to that. That is, of course, how all righteousness works. That's what that emotion does to the human mind.

                      I’ve provided very reasonable approaches to understanding the nature of TuCa’s allegations. Unfortunately TuCa only makes allegations with no evidence at all and even his employer won’t back him up. How I am on thin ice is really quite fascinating. TuCa and many here demand a response from the NSA, but quizzingly make no such demand of the employer.

                      I would submit demanding the NSA respond when his employer won’t more aptly fits righteousness.

                      Somehow this unknown whistleblower who no one has ever talked to and emails that have never been shared are more important than sources that CNN is standing behind. I suspect more to come from this…TuCa, next move is yours.

                      You can call me deluded if I think it's likely there is something interesting, and awkward for the NSA, to this story. That is in fact what I think. You think it's a bunch of hot air from a sensationalist talking head. Fine. That's a reasonable disagreement. But your schtick about how you're an island of sanity surrounded by nutcases untethered to reality is getting old. You're on that kick with a few different topics now. About the only difference I've noticed is how you've become a Full Stop moralist lately. Anybody not getting the vaccine is a social cancer Full Stop. Anybody not emoting about the existential next level destruction of the social fabric on January 6 is in full denial of reality Full Stop. Anybody who thinks Carson's story has some meat to it is a hypocritical tribalist Full Stop. Did I miss one? I think I may have.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Loki
                      wrote on last edited by Loki
                      #151

                      @horace

                      I didn’t see that coming, I’ll adjust.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                        @copper said in Spying?:

                        @loki said in Spying?:

                        @horace said in Spying?:

                        The NSA was eager to respond when this story first broke, with their non-denial denial. "Mr Carlson has never been an intelligence target". Will they be as eager to respond to Mr Paul's four questions? If not, why not? I bet they will not answer those questions, at least not without an investigation.

                        Of course, recent history shows us, as Mr Paul notes, that it is far, far from an "implausible conspiracy theory" that the NSA might employ people with security clearance and political axes to grind, and without the requisite honor as human beings to not grind those axes.

                        When pop culture welcomes such tribal righteousness with open arms, who can blame them? They are only human, operating as humans always have, and always will. That's why they need to be held in check. I respect Mr Paul's attempt to do so.

                        So every fishing expedition must be responded to?

                        This thread is full of wordy words….and no evidence.

                        Let me repeat…NO evidence. He said he/she said. Seriously. Kafkaesque to demand so much with no evidence to be followed up on.

                        Mr. Carlson clearly has verbal and written evidence.

                        Repeating over and over that he doesn’t won’t change that.

                        If he has written evidence, why isn't he showing it to us?

                        I'm not saying he doesn't, but if he has it, why all the drama?

                        RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #152

                        @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

                        If he has written evidence, why isn't he showing it to us?
                        I'm not saying he doesn't, but if he has it, why all the drama?

                        It is alleged that his primary advisor is none other than Giorgio Tsoukalos.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • HoraceH Horace

                          @loki said in Spying?:

                          @horace said in Spying?:

                          Loki considers himself to have established beyond any shadow of a doubt his own objectivity in all things political. Thus when he becomes righteously indignant over politically charged issues, it is the indignancy of objectivity - and he does not countenance the existence of any reasonable opposition to that. That is, of course, how all righteousness works. That's what that emotion does to the human mind.

                          I’ve provided very reasonable approaches to understanding the nature of TuCa’s allegations. Unfortunately TuCa only makes allegations with no evidence at all and even his employer won’t back him up. How I am on thin ice is really quite fascinating. TuCa and many here demand a response from the NSA, but quizzingly make no such demand of the employer.

                          I would submit demanding the NSA respond when his employer won’t more aptly fits righteousness.

                          Somehow this unknown whistleblower who no one has ever talked to and emails that have never been shared are more important than sources that CNN is standing behind. I suspect more to come from this…TuCa, next move is yours.

                          You can call me deluded if I think it's likely there is something interesting, and awkward for the NSA, to this story. That is in fact what I think. You think it's a bunch of hot air from a sensationalist talking head. Fine. That's a reasonable disagreement. But your schtick about how you're an island of sanity surrounded by nutcases untethered to reality is getting old. You're on that kick with a few different topics now. About the only difference I've noticed is how you've become a Full Stop moralist lately. Anybody not getting the vaccine is a social cancer Full Stop. Anybody not emoting about the existential next level destruction of the social fabric on January 6 is in full denial of reality Full Stop. Anybody who thinks Carson's story has some meat to it is a hypocritical tribalist Full Stop. Did I miss one? I think I may have.

                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #153

                          @horace said in Spying?:

                          But your schtick about how you're an island of sanity surrounded by nutcases untethered to reality is getting old.

                          Actually, that's me. He's as mad as a hatter just like the rest of you.

                          I was only joking

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups