@Horace said in LEAN into it?:
@Aqua-Letifer Thanks for expanding on your point. I didn't mean to imply that personal resonances in the reader should not exist. I take your point that Tolkien wanted to impress on everybody that he had no specific allegory in mind, but that he embraces the fact that readers will take their own abstract messages.
Beyond the detesting allegory thing, I was referring to this, from that same prologue:
The prime motive was the desire of a tale teller to try his hand at a long story, that would hold the attention of readers, amuse them, delight them, and at times maybe excite them or deeply move them.
Yeah, that makes sense and in my mind is not contradictory. Whether you're John Creasey, crankin' out another paperback over the weekend or Tolkien, developing a deep story with massive cultural resonances, your book is going to suck if it's not engrossing. But that's not all that it was to him.
He admits it here:
It was not what I set out to write, but it is what it has become.