The clerk read his official resignation today.
He's gone.
Now, who else was in that photo/video???
Ruben, dat you?
Be like Lindsey...

The clerk read his official resignation today.
He's gone.
Now, who else was in that photo/video???
Ruben, dat you?
Be like Lindsey...

Swalwell is still on the ballot in California. His "suspending" his campaign doesn't change that.
He also has not, as of yet, submitted a letter of resignation, tho it might change in the coming days. He could, if he wanted, fester linger a while.
I wonder what other rotten apples will fall. Maybe some of the 150 or so congressmen who voted against full disclosure of sexual abuse settlements?
I've read that he's an inconvenient candidate because of California's "jungle primary," in which two republicans are leading in the polls. Eliminating him reduces the number of Democrats running for office, giving Mrs. Potato Head a better shot.
I don't know if he's running for a congressional seat. Somewhere, I read that he has to NOT run for congress if he runs for governor.
Remember this guy?
Link to videoRemember the guy who flew under the Eiffel Tower?

End your campaign, but he can stay in Congress, at least for now.
"Shy Sotomayor??"
Really?
What's the over/under for the survival of the Noem's marriage?
Congratulations to NASA on a successful mission.
Marco Rubio, as usual, is ready.

Read all the lurid details here:
https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/eric-swalwell-allegations-22198271.php
Remember this? Good times.
Link to videoOoof...
Multiple people have abruptly resigned from Rep. Eric Swalwell’s gubernatorial campaign, throwing the durability of his operation into question after the California Democrat repeatedly this week denied allegations of sexual misconduct.
Members of senior leadership have departed the campaign, including Courtni Pugh, a strategic adviser who served as Swalwell’s top liaison to organized labor groups.
Pugh confirmed her resignation, but declined to comment further. Two other people, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal campaign dynamics, confirmed there have been at least four departures.
The resignations came just before the San Francisco Chronicle published a report Friday afternoon reporting that a former staffer claims Swalwell had sexual encounters with her while working for him, and that he sexually assaulted her twice when she was too drunk to consent.
@LuFins-Dad fake news. AFAIK, Biden never owned a Trans Am.
He did, however, have a 'Vette which was safely stored with assorted classified documents in his garage.
But that's another thread.
If I poke holes in someone's condom, do I have any legal exposure?
@grok
Yes, you have significant legal exposure. This act—sabotaging a condom by poking holes—is widely recognized as a form of reproductive coercion, stealthing (non-consensual condom removal or tampering), or sexual assault/battery in many jurisdictions. It is not a harmless prank; it can expose you to criminal charges and civil lawsuits.Criminal LiabilitySexual assault, battery, or rape by deception: Courts in various US states and countries have treated intentional condom sabotage as vitiating consent. The other person consented to protected sex, not unprotected sex with the risk of pregnancy or STD transmission. This has led to convictions for sexual assault or related offenses.
Aggravated assault or reckless endangerment: If it results in pregnancy, STD transmission (e.g., HIV, herpes, chlamydia), or other harm, it can escalate to felony charges involving bodily injury or disease transmission.
Examples of laws:Many US states (e.g., California, New York, Michigan) explicitly or through case law cover non-consensual condom tampering under sexual assault statutes.
Federal aspects could apply if it crosses state lines or involves certain transmissions.
Internationally, places like the UK, Canada, Australia, and parts of Europe have prosecuted similar acts as assault or fraud.
Prosecutors can pursue this even without pregnancy if there's evidence of intent (texts, witnesses, damaged condoms).Civil LiabilityLawsuits for damages: The victim can sue for battery, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, or wrongful pregnancy/child support issues. You could face liability for:Medical costs (prenatal care, STD treatment, abortion, or childbirth).
Child support (in many places, courts have ruled that deception doesn't eliminate parental financial responsibility, but you can still be sued for other harms).
Emotional distress, lost wages, therapy.
Punitive damages are possible if the act is deemed malicious.
Evidence and ConsequencesModern forensics (DNA on condoms, residue analysis, packaging examination) plus digital evidence (messages admitting intent) make this traceable. Victims often report it after discovering pregnancy or infection. Convictions or settlements can include jail/prison time, sex offender registration (in some cases), fines, restraining orders, and lifelong financial obligations.Even if not convicted criminally, civil discovery and reputational damage are major risks. "It was just a joke" or "they didn't notice" is not a defense—courts focus on lack of informed consent.Strong recommendation: Do not do this. It is unethical, violates consent, and can destroy lives (yours included). If this is hypothetical, the answer is clear: high legal risk with potentially life-altering consequences. Consult a lawyer in your specific jurisdiction for personalized advice, but the general rule is avoid entirely. If you're dealing with relationship issues around consent or contraception, seek ethical communication or professional counseling instead.
A friend of the family passed away last month. She was pretty close to my family and we always exchanged Christmas and birthday gifts.
She had a large family - I believe 8 chlldren scattered around the country.
One of her sons stopped by the day after she died, and I asked about funeral/memorial arrangements. He told me that it was her wish to not have anything done. She just wanted to be cremated and be in the cemetery next to her husband who died about 20 years ago.
I feel a bit odd about this. Granted, it’s what she wanted, but OTOH, it seems like it would be nice for friends and family to gather to celebrate her life. A friend of mine called her desire “selfish.”
Thoughts?
The train didn't "barely miss" the bus. It grazed the rear. You can see the bus move when the train passes, though that might be Bernoulli effect.
The driver was charged with 29 counts of child endangerment. There were 29 kids on the bus.