Losing the next war.
-
-
I love the way he says that Patton was assassinated by the OSS and NKVD as though it's an established fact.
There's more than a whiff of click-bait about the whole thing.
By the same author...
how 1 mistake cost hitler victory during world war ii
He sucks you in, and then....
-
I agree with Trump’s position on war. Why do we want to spend our money on it? It’s pointless, we haven’t won anything in decades.
There’s no conceivable direct conflict possible between nuclear powers. We all have the power to make the world uninhabitable.
Given that nuclear powers have a remote controlled suicide vest on every other country, shouldn’t our focus be on preventing “mad men” from getting the reigns of military power in all countries?
I just don’t see how any nuclear power can push around another nuclear power with conventional weapons.
As this article demonstrates, we still act as if it’s 1940 out there.
-
I agree with Trump’s position on war. Why do we want to spend our money on it? It’s pointless, we haven’t won anything in decades.
There’s no conceivable direct conflict possible between nuclear powers. We all have the power to make the world uninhabitable.
Given that nuclear powers have a remote controlled suicide vest on every other country, shouldn’t our focus be on preventing “mad men” from getting the reigns of military power in all countries?
I just don’t see how any nuclear power can push around another nuclear power with conventional weapons.
As this article demonstrates, we still act as if it’s 1940 out there.
@xenon said in Losing the next war.:
Given that nuclear powers have a remote controlled suicide vest on every other country, shouldn’t our focus be on preventing “mad men” from getting the reigns of military power in all countries?
There's the problem.
If you believe you're guaranteed a place in valhalla if you die in the service of Thor or Odin, what's stopping you?
-
I agree with Trump’s position on war. Why do we want to spend our money on it? It’s pointless, we haven’t won anything in decades.
There’s no conceivable direct conflict possible between nuclear powers. We all have the power to make the world uninhabitable.
Given that nuclear powers have a remote controlled suicide vest on every other country, shouldn’t our focus be on preventing “mad men” from getting the reigns of military power in all countries?
I just don’t see how any nuclear power can push around another nuclear power with conventional weapons.
As this article demonstrates, we still act as if it’s 1940 out there.
@xenon said in Losing the next war.:
Why do we want to spend our money on it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts
image url)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login