What are you watching now?
-
@jodi said in What are you watching now?:
@Mik I made it into the official trailer! For about a half second.
What are you holding? A sign, or is that, indeed a newspaper?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@jodi said in What are you watching now?:
@Horace Not newspapers - protest signs! “Protect America’s Youth”, “Prohibition for Montana”, that sort of thing. Whiskey was misspelled on my sign (left out the e) Not on purpose. (Props were made for us) It made me laugh. Tried to cover it up with my glove! There is a small chance you might actually hear my voice in the episode (I’m pretty loud). Or maybe they will block it out because I’m too loud, lol. There was a group watching a boxing match on the corner across from us - they were all yelling too. It was amazing - all the cars, all the horses and wagons, several hundred extras - all these things that had to go around the block and get set up again for the next take.
It's my understanding that Whisky and Whiskey are two different words which describe two different things. So I think it's all good. That's neat that you were able to participate in that.
-
@jodi said in What are you watching now?:
@Mik I made it into the official trailer! For about a half second.
What are you holding? A sign, or is that, indeed a newspaper?
-
@Horace You are right - looks like either spelling is correct - I learned something new today! Wonder if one is older, or just used in different places. Just looked in our cabinet. The Midleton has an “e”, the Balvenie does not.
@jodi said in What are you watching now?:
@Horace You are right - looks like either spelling is correct - I learned something new today!
https://www.thekitchn.com/whiskey-vs-whisky-whats-the-di-100476
Up until quite recently, The New York Times tackled the problem by spelling everything the American way (with an E), regardless of the spirit’s country of origin. From Kentucky bourbon to Islay malts, everything was “whiskey” to The NYTimes. But then, last February, the venerable newspaper made a decisive change.
After receiving a raft of complaints from some serious Scotch whisky drinkers, the paper re-tooled its approach to follow that of many specialized spirits publications, spelling each type of spirit according to the way favored by its country of origin. So, while American-produced varieties such as bourbon, rye, and Tennessee – as well as the Irish stuff – kept their previous NYTimes-styled “whiskey” spelling, the stuff from Scotland, Canada, and Japan now would be referred to as “whisky.” Makes a lot of sense, I think.
Whiskey/whisky nmemonics:
Here’s a quick way to remember how some of the world’s biggest producers spell their products:
Countries that have E’s in their names (UnitEd StatEs and IrEland) tend to spell it whiskEy (plural whiskeys)
Countries without E’s in their names (Canada, Scotland, and Japan) spell it whisky (plural whiskies) -
If you really want to be up yourself, you could spell it uisce (Irish) or uisge (Scottish gaelic)
-
That's funny. I watched the first episode and had no desire for more.
I'm watching Slow Horses, S2, The Crown, S5.
@Mik said in What are you watching now?:
That's funny. I watched the first episode and had no desire for more.
I'm watching Slow Horses, S2, The Crown, S5.
I had a similar reaction after the first episode - nothing special... but my brother had raved over it so much that I powered through the first couple.
It's not a very plot-driven show - and it takes a little while for the characters to get interesting... and they're all pretty cringey..
-
Binged through "Suspicion" on Apple TV.
Basic idea: Wealthy CEO's (Uma Thurmon) son gets kidnapped at a hotel in NYC. 4 people from London, all of whom were in NYC that night become suspects. None of them know each other, and the cops are lost.
Interesting premise.
Terrible show.
Never connected with any of the characters, plot points are strained and contrived.
1 ½ stars.
-
@Mik said in What are you watching now?:
That's funny. I watched the first episode and had no desire for more.
I'm watching Slow Horses, S2, The Crown, S5.
I had a similar reaction after the first episode - nothing special... but my brother had raved over it so much that I powered through the first couple.
It's not a very plot-driven show - and it takes a little while for the characters to get interesting... and they're all pretty cringey..
@xenon said in What are you watching now?:
I had a similar reaction after the first episode - nothing special... but my brother had raved over it so much that I powered through the first couple.
It's not a very plot-driven show - and it takes a little while for the characters to get interesting... and they're all pretty cringey..
On your recco, I watched #1. Yeah, nothing special at all. Actually kind of formulaic and boring. All these weirdos at a resort.
Must admit I was kind of shocked at the expose of the "cancer" worry.
But, also based on your recco, I'll give it another few chances.
-
Watching Three Pines on Prime right now. Based on the Inspector Gamache book series. @George-K and anyone who likes detective procedurals might like it.
Pros: Interesting story construction. There are longer narratives that take place over a whole season, but also different cases that split the episodes into a Part 1 and Part 2 for those. What's fun is, this creates recurring characters for awhile as Gamache spends time in the town. (I've been told that I'll be Ruth when I get older. Which isn't fair at all. I'm not into ducks.)
Also, decent enough mysteries and copwork, and the characters do develop.
Cons: Eh, it doesn't exactly break new ground. And it can get a little tropey. But they don't screw it up too bad, either. Enjoyable enough.
Please love yourself.
-
Watching Three Pines on Prime right now. Based on the Inspector Gamache book series. @George-K and anyone who likes detective procedurals might like it.
Pros: Interesting story construction. There are longer narratives that take place over a whole season, but also different cases that split the episodes into a Part 1 and Part 2 for those. What's fun is, this creates recurring characters for awhile as Gamache spends time in the town. (I've been told that I'll be Ruth when I get older. Which isn't fair at all. I'm not into ducks.)
Also, decent enough mysteries and copwork, and the characters do develop.
Cons: Eh, it doesn't exactly break new ground. And it can get a little tropey. But they don't screw it up too bad, either. Enjoyable enough.
@Aqua-Letifer looks like it might be fun. Each mysterie is 2 episodes, so it's not a huge commitment if I don't like.
Added to my watchlist.
Thanks.
-
Also, regarding Willow,
Amar Chadha-Patel is a fucking CHAMPION. The show is so bad. It's so bad. The cast, the crew, the writers, the director, the video editors, fucking camera operators for crying out loud—everything about this show is amateur hour. Even Warwick Davis absolutely sucks. It's not his fault—the writing's so shit that he couldn't save it.
But Amar Chadha-Patel is a beast. He's so obviously the adult in the room in every scene he's in. He elevates each total trainwreck into something almost worth watching. It's an absolute damn shame he's wasting his time.
-
@taiwan_girl Nope, just an “extra” - which means background, no speaking. Though we did get to speak in this - we were protesting - we were temperance women - about the evils of alcohol - we got to SHOUT at the top of our lungs (after the first couple of takes, on the way out of the building, Harrison Ford looked at us and suggested we save our voices a little for later!). He, (or his double) rode in, dismounted, pushed through our little group - as we berated, yelled, shook our fingers - it was hilarious. We were LOUD. They filmed the whole scene from multiple angles, starting from the top of the building and slowly moving closer throughout the day - to the point that it was close up, and Harrison Ford and the one actress amount the rest of the 13 extras had lines - we had to go from shouting to mouthing silently what we had been shouting as soon as his foot hit the curb (so you could hear the lines) - that was way harder than it seems - to make it believable - and they had to do a couple of retakes because a few of the ladies messed up and kept yelling! Apparently if you have actual lines, you have to join the union, or something. But yelling in a crowd doesn’t count.
@jodi said in What are you watching now?:
we had to go from shouting to mouthing silently what we had been shouting as soon as his foot hit the curb (so you could hear the lines) - that was way harder than it seems
Hey, Star, here's a tip for your next appearance. In soap opera crowd scenes, like yours, behind the main speakers, the extras mouth (or say softly) "watermelon cantaloupe" over and over, because doing so most faithfully replicates ordinary speech.
-
We tried to watch Dog (movie) last night. Don't. Just don't.
Started Echo 3, a new series on AppleTV. Pretty good so far, not sure how they make a series out of it Might get Lost-ish, where it just spins and spins and goes nowhere. Might be good.
Blackbird first episode. pretty good.
Will probably watch Emancipation this week.
-
Just finished the 2nd season of White Lotus.
Highly recommend. There's very little continuity between the seasons and they're 6-7 episodes each.
Great, great TV.
@xenon said in What are you watching now?:
Just finished the 2nd season of White Lotus.
Highly recommend. There's very little continuity between the seasons and they're 6-7 episodes each.
Great, great TV.
Watched the first two episodes of 2nd season.
I stand by my earlier assessment. Bunch of rich weirdos who give me no reason to invest in their stories at a five-star hotel. The only reason to continue is to watch F. Murray Abraham.
But it's not a good enough reason.
