Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mildly interesting

Mildly interesting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
2.4k Posts 31 Posters 267.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girl
    wrote on last edited by
    #629

    @jon-nyc said in Mildly interesting:

    Wow! I never thought of that!

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #630

      IMG_1449.JPG

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #631

        F44474A4-B472-4186-8FA7-D1C32B40A5F3.jpeg

        You were warned.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #632

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG George K

            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #633

            @George-K

            Wow. That’s a lot of effort, even for the model.

            You were warned.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG George K

              No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.

              IMG_1434.JPG

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #634

              @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

              No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.

              IMG_1434.JPG

              The can looks like an Akula class Soviet sub, but the conning tower looks different. I don't think that's an American sub.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG George K

                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by
                #635

                @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                The Brad

                George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                  I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                  George KG Offline
                  George KG Offline
                  George K
                  wrote on last edited by George K
                  #636

                  @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                  I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                  They don't refer to octopi at all.

                  It's "octopuses."

                  “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                  Excerpt From
                  The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                  Sy Montgomery

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                  The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                  Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                  Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG George K

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                    I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                    They don't refer to octopi at all.

                    It's "octopuses."

                    “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                    Excerpt From
                    The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                    Sy Montgomery

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                    The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                    Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                    Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #637

                    @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                    I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                    They don't refer to octopi at all.

                    It's "octopuses."

                    “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                    Excerpt From
                    The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                    Sy Montgomery

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                    The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                    Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                    Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                    I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                    The Brad

                    George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                      I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                      They don't refer to octopi at all.

                      It's "octopuses."

                      “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                      Excerpt From
                      The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                      Sy Montgomery

                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                      The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                      Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                      Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                      I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                      George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #638

                      @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                      I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                      Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                      An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                      Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                      Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                      However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                      What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                      The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                      Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                      Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #639

                        alt text

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • George KG George K

                          @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                          I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                          Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                          An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                          Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                          Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                          However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                          What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                          The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                          Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                          Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #640

                          @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                          @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                          I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                          Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                          An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                          Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                          Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                          However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                          What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                          The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                          Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                          Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                          🤬

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girlT Offline
                            taiwan_girl
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #641

                            (May have mentioned this before so apology if I did).

                            Of all the major cities in the world, if you take an average temperature from 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, the hottest city in the world is Bangkok.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • markM Offline
                              markM Offline
                              mark
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #642

                              Link to video

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #643

                                Very interesting, Mark

                                You were warned.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                                  taiwan_girl
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #644

                                  Amazon 1995 webpage

                                  alt text

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girl
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #645

                                    This is what Roman roads looked like. A perfectly preserved section of Roman road. Part of the Flaminian Way.

                                    alt text

                                    jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • George KG Offline
                                      George KG Offline
                                      George K
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #646

                                      IMG_1458.JPG

                                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                                        This is what Roman roads looked like. A perfectly preserved section of Roman road. Part of the Flaminian Way.

                                        alt text

                                        jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #647

                                        @taiwan_girl said in Mildly interesting:

                                        This is what Roman roads looked like. A perfectly preserved section of Roman road. Part of the Flaminian Way.

                                        alt text

                                        WHERS THE FUCKING BIKE LANE?!?

                                        You were warned.

                                        markM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                          @taiwan_girl said in Mildly interesting:

                                          This is what Roman roads looked like. A perfectly preserved section of Roman road. Part of the Flaminian Way.

                                          alt text

                                          WHERS THE FUCKING BIKE LANE?!?

                                          markM Offline
                                          markM Offline
                                          mark
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #648

                                          @jon-nyc lol

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups