Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mildly interesting

Mildly interesting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
2.4k Posts 31 Posters 291.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Axtremus
    27 Oct 2022, 02:24

    @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

    H Offline
    H Offline
    Horace
    wrote on 27 Oct 2022, 02:49 last edited by
    #626

    @Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:

    @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

    Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.

    Please correct your post.

    Education is extremely important.

    D 1 Reply Last reply 27 Oct 2022, 02:52
    • H Horace
      27 Oct 2022, 02:49

      @Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:

      @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

      Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.

      Please correct your post.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote on 27 Oct 2022, 02:52 last edited by Doctor Phibes
      #627

      @Horace said in Mildly interesting:

      @Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:

      @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

      Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.

      Please correct your post.

      They also cut the bit out where the minimum wage guy gleefully stamps on all the cases marked 'Fragile', which is almost certainly the best part of that job.

      I was only joking

      1 Reply Last reply
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        George K
        wrote on 27 Oct 2022, 11:35 last edited by
        #628

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        L 1 Reply Last reply 1 Nov 2022, 13:18
        • J jon-nyc
          26 Oct 2022, 07:55

          T Offline
          T Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on 28 Oct 2022, 02:32 last edited by
          #629

          @jon-nyc said in Mildly interesting:

          Wow! I never thought of that!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            George K
            wrote on 29 Oct 2022, 11:15 last edited by
            #630

            IMG_1449.JPG

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on 31 Oct 2022, 17:04 last edited by
              #631

              F44474A4-B472-4186-8FA7-D1C32B40A5F3.jpeg

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • G Offline
                G Offline
                George K
                wrote on 31 Oct 2022, 20:56 last edited by
                #632

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                J 1 Reply Last reply 1 Nov 2022, 08:13
                • G George K
                  31 Oct 2022, 20:56

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 08:13 last edited by
                  #633

                  @George-K

                  Wow. That’s a lot of effort, even for the model.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • G George K
                    22 Oct 2022, 12:17

                    No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.

                    IMG_1434.JPG

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 12:07 last edited by
                    #634

                    @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                    No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.

                    IMG_1434.JPG

                    The can looks like an Akula class Soviet sub, but the conning tower looks different. I don't think that's an American sub.

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • G George K
                      27 Oct 2022, 11:35

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:18 last edited by
                      #635

                      @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                      I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                      The Brad

                      G 1 Reply Last reply 1 Nov 2022, 13:21
                      • L LuFins Dad
                        1 Nov 2022, 13:18

                        @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                        I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:21 last edited by George K 11 Jan 2022, 13:23
                        #636

                        @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                        I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                        They don't refer to octopi at all.

                        It's "octopuses."

                        “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                        Excerpt From
                        The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                        Sy Montgomery

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                        The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                        Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                        Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply 1 Nov 2022, 13:24
                        • G George K
                          1 Nov 2022, 13:21

                          @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                          I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                          They don't refer to octopi at all.

                          It's "octopuses."

                          “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                          Excerpt From
                          The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                          Sy Montgomery

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                          The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                          Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                          Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:24 last edited by
                          #637

                          @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                          @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                          I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                          They don't refer to octopi at all.

                          It's "octopuses."

                          “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                          Excerpt From
                          The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                          Sy Montgomery

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                          The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                          Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                          Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                          I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                          The Brad

                          G 1 Reply Last reply 1 Nov 2022, 13:27
                          • L LuFins Dad
                            1 Nov 2022, 13:24

                            @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                            @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                            I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                            They don't refer to octopi at all.

                            It's "octopuses."

                            “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                            Excerpt From
                            The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                            Sy Montgomery

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                            The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                            Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                            Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                            I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:27 last edited by
                            #638

                            @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                            I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                            Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                            An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                            Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                            Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                            However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                            What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                            The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                            Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                            Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply 1 Nov 2022, 18:05
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jolly
                              wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 16:18 last edited by
                              #639

                              alt text

                              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • G George K
                                1 Nov 2022, 13:27

                                @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                                Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                                An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                                Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                                Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                                However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                                What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                                The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                                Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                                Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                LuFins Dad
                                wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 18:05 last edited by
                                #640

                                @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                                @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                                Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                                An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                                Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                                Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                                However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                                What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                                The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                                Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                                Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                                🤬

                                The Brad

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  taiwan_girl
                                  wrote on 2 Nov 2022, 09:58 last edited by
                                  #641

                                  (May have mentioned this before so apology if I did).

                                  Of all the major cities in the world, if you take an average temperature from 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, the hottest city in the world is Bangkok.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • markM Offline
                                    markM Offline
                                    mark
                                    wrote on 3 Nov 2022, 02:16 last edited by
                                    #642

                                    Link to video

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on 3 Nov 2022, 02:36 last edited by
                                      #643

                                      Very interesting, Mark

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        taiwan_girl
                                        wrote on 3 Nov 2022, 04:38 last edited by
                                        #644

                                        Amazon 1995 webpage

                                        alt text

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          taiwan_girl
                                          wrote on 3 Nov 2022, 06:02 last edited by
                                          #645

                                          This is what Roman roads looked like. A perfectly preserved section of Roman road. Part of the Flaminian Way.

                                          alt text

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply 3 Nov 2022, 12:05
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes

                                          635/2404

                                          1 Nov 2022, 13:18


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          635 out of 2404
                                          • First post
                                            635/2404
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups