Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mildly interesting

Mildly interesting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
2.4k Posts 31 Posters 292.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Catseye3C Offline
    Catseye3C Offline
    Catseye3
    wrote on last edited by
    #622

    George, today's Bookbub is offering the book Final Patrol: "During World War II, the US Navy’s submarine service suffered the highest rate of casualties of any American armed forces branch. Learn the stories behind 16 of these vessels — and the soldiers who lived, fought, and died in them. A must-have for military history enthusiasts."

    Coincidence, eh?

    Goto What/Reading to read more.

    Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #623

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #624

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #625

          @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

          HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
          • AxtremusA Axtremus

            @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

            HoraceH Online
            HoraceH Online
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #626

            @Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:

            @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

            Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.

            Please correct your post.

            Education is extremely important.

            Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Horace

              @Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:

              @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

              Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.

              Please correct your post.

              Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
              #627

              @Horace said in Mildly interesting:

              @Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:

              @George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.

              Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.

              Please correct your post.

              They also cut the bit out where the minimum wage guy gleefully stamps on all the cases marked 'Fragile', which is almost certainly the best part of that job.

              I was only joking

              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #628

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #629

                  @jon-nyc said in Mildly interesting:

                  Wow! I never thought of that!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #630

                    IMG_1449.JPG

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #631

                      F44474A4-B472-4186-8FA7-D1C32B40A5F3.jpeg

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • George KG Offline
                        George KG Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #632

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • George KG George K

                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #633

                          @George-K

                          Wow. That’s a lot of effort, even for the model.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG George K

                            No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.

                            IMG_1434.JPG

                            JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #634

                            @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                            No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.

                            IMG_1434.JPG

                            The can looks like an Akula class Soviet sub, but the conning tower looks different. I don't think that's an American sub.

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • George KG George K

                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins DadL Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #635

                              @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                              I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                              The Brad

                              George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                                I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                                George KG Offline
                                George KG Offline
                                George K
                                wrote on last edited by George K
                                #636

                                @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                                They don't refer to octopi at all.

                                It's "octopuses."

                                “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                                Excerpt From
                                The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                                Sy Montgomery

                                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                                The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                                Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                                Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG George K

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                  I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                                  They don't refer to octopi at all.

                                  It's "octopuses."

                                  “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                                  Excerpt From
                                  The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                                  Sy Montgomery

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                                  The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                                  Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                                  Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #637

                                  @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                  I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                                  They don't refer to octopi at all.

                                  It's "octopuses."

                                  “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                                  Excerpt From
                                  The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                                  Sy Montgomery

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                                  The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                                  Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                                  Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                                  I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                                  The Brad

                                  George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                    @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                                    @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                    I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…

                                    They don't refer to octopi at all.

                                    It's "octopuses."

                                    “I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”

                                    Excerpt From
                                    The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
                                    Sy Montgomery

                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation

                                    The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]

                                    Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]

                                    Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]

                                    I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                                    George KG Offline
                                    George KG Offline
                                    George K
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #638

                                    @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                    I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                                    Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                                    An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                                    Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                                    Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                                    However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                                    What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                                    The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                                    Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                                    Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • JollyJ Offline
                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #639

                                      alt text

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • George KG George K

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                        I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                                        Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                                        An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                                        Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                                        Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                                        However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                                        What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                                        The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                                        Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                                        Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins Dad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #640

                                        @George-K said in Mildly interesting:

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:

                                        I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.

                                        Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?

                                        An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.

                                        Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.

                                        Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”

                                        However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.

                                        What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?

                                        The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.

                                        Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.

                                        Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.

                                        🤬

                                        The Brad

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • taiwan_girlT Online
                                          taiwan_girlT Online
                                          taiwan_girl
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #641

                                          (May have mentioned this before so apology if I did).

                                          Of all the major cities in the world, if you take an average temperature from 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, the hottest city in the world is Bangkok.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups