Mildly interesting
-
wrote on 22 Oct 2022, 12:17 last edited by
No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.
-
wrote on 22 Oct 2022, 12:36 last edited by Catseye3
Scroll down to see the plaque dedicated to those still on patrol.
-
Scroll down to see the plaque dedicated to those still on patrol.
-
wrote on 22 Oct 2022, 17:18 last edited by
George, today's Bookbub is offering the book Final Patrol: "During World War II, the US Navy’s submarine service suffered the highest rate of casualties of any American armed forces branch. Learn the stories behind 16 of these vessels — and the soldiers who lived, fought, and died in them. A must-have for military history enthusiasts."
Coincidence, eh?
Goto What/Reading to read more.
-
wrote on 26 Oct 2022, 07:55 last edited by
-
wrote on 26 Oct 2022, 22:22 last edited by
-
@George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.
wrote on 27 Oct 2022, 02:49 last edited by@Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:
@George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.
Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.
Please correct your post.
-
@Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:
@George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.
Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.
Please correct your post.
wrote on 27 Oct 2022, 02:52 last edited by Doctor Phibes@Horace said in Mildly interesting:
@Axtremus said in Mildly interesting:
@George-K interesting… I suspect it looks fun only because the video is speeded up. Bet it would be very boring in real time.
Incorrect. It does not look fun even when sped up.
Please correct your post.
They also cut the bit out where the minimum wage guy gleefully stamps on all the cases marked 'Fragile', which is almost certainly the best part of that job.
-
wrote on 27 Oct 2022, 11:35 last edited by
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2022, 02:32 last edited by
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2022, 11:15 last edited by
-
wrote on 31 Oct 2022, 17:04 last edited by
-
wrote on 31 Oct 2022, 20:56 last edited by
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 12:07 last edited by
@George-K said in Mildly interesting:
No idea if this is true or not. Searches are not helpful.
The can looks like an Akula class Soviet sub, but the conning tower looks different. I don't think that's an American sub.
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:18 last edited by
@George-K said in Mildly interesting:
I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…
-
@George-K said in Mildly interesting:
I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…
wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:21 last edited by George K 11 Jan 2022, 13:23@LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:
I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…
They don't refer to octopi at all.
It's "octopuses."
“I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”
Excerpt From
The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
Sy Montgomeryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation
The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]
Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]
Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:
I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…
They don't refer to octopi at all.
It's "octopuses."
“I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”
Excerpt From
The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
Sy Montgomeryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation
The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]
Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]
Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]
wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:24 last edited by@George-K said in Mildly interesting:
@LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:
I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…
They don't refer to octopi at all.
It's "octopuses."
“I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”
Excerpt From
The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
Sy Montgomeryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation
The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]
Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]
Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]
I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.
-
@George-K said in Mildly interesting:
@LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:
I’m pretty sure scientists refer to Octopi as having neither arms or legs, but tentacles…
They don't refer to octopi at all.
It's "octopuses."
“I knew little about octopuses—not even that the scientifically correct plural is not octopi, as I had always believed (it turns out you can’t put a Latin ending—i—on a word derived from Greek, such as octopus). ”
Excerpt From
The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness
Sy Montgomeryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus#Etymology_and_pluralisation
The scientific Latin term octopus was derived from Ancient Greek ὀκτώπους, a compound form of ὀκτώ (oktō, "eight") and πούς (pous, "foot"), itself a variant form of ὀκτάπους, a word used for example by Alexander of Tralles (c. 525–c. 605) for the common octopus.[5][6][7] The standard pluralised form of "octopus" in English is "octopuses";[8] the Ancient Greek plural ὀκτώποδες, "octopodes" (/ɒkˈtɒpədiːz/), has also been used historically.[9] The alternative plural "octopi" is considered grammatically incorrect because it wrongly assumes that octopus is a Latin second declension "-us" noun or adjective when, in either Greek or Latin, it is a third declension noun.[10][11]
Historically, the first plural to commonly appear in English language sources, in the early 19th century, is the latinate form "octopi",[12] followed by the English form "octopuses" in the latter half of the same century. The Hellenic plural is roughly contemporary in usage, although it is also the rarest.[13]
Fowler's Modern English Usage states that the only acceptable plural in English is "octopuses", that "octopi" is misconceived, and "octopodes" pedantic;[14][15][16] the last is nonetheless used frequently enough to be acknowledged by the descriptivist Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate Dictionary and Webster's New World College Dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary lists "octopuses", "octopi", and "octopodes", in that order, reflecting frequency of use, calling "octopodes" rare and noting that "octopi" is based on a misunderstanding.[17] The New Oxford American Dictionary (3rd Edition, 2010) lists "octopuses" as the only acceptable pluralisation, and indicates that "octopodes" is still occasionally used, but that "octopi" is incorrect.[18]
I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.
wrote on 1 Nov 2022, 13:27 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Mildly interesting:
I stand corrected in the minutiae, but stand firm on the trivial.
Do Octopus Have Tentacles Or Arms?
An Octopus has eight appendages which is what gives them that famous alien-like appearance that many find so frightening.
Each of which has rows of suckers running down its length. But these are not tentacles as you may expect, and in strict anatomical terms, they are arms.
Sea Life biologist Oliver Walenciak said, “one can assume that the front six tentacles have the function of arms and that the back two take over the function of legs.”
However, unlike humans or some other animals, most Octopuses did not appear to be left or right-handed.
What Is The Difference Between Arms And Tentacles?
The main difference between arms and tentacles is that arms, like those of an octopus, have suction cups the entire length of the limb.
Whereas tentacles only have suction cups near the end of the limb. Some cephalopods have arms, whilst some have tentacles, and some even have both.
Cephalopod tentacles and arms lack bones; instead, they are built from an intricate tapestry of coiling muscle fibers.