Mildly interesting
-
From the preface of the book Information Wars by Richard Stengel: "In 2010, Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google, said we create as much information every two days -- about five exabytes -- as all the information created from the dawn of civilization until 2003."
-
Asking the hard questions.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/scott-morrison-mcdonalds
-
Asking the hard questions.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/scott-morrison-mcdonalds
@Aqua-Letifer said in Mildly interesting:
Asking the hard questions.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/scott-morrison-mcdonalds
DID THE PRIME MINISTER OF AUSTRALIA SHIT HIS PANTS IN A MCDONALD’S?
The answer to the following question implies a great deal about one's own psychology: Would you prefer to live in a world in which the answer to the above question is yes, or no?
-
@Aqua-Letifer said in Mildly interesting:
Asking the hard questions.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/scott-morrison-mcdonalds
DID THE PRIME MINISTER OF AUSTRALIA SHIT HIS PANTS IN A MCDONALD’S?
The answer to the following question implies a great deal about one's own psychology: Would you prefer to live in a world in which the answer to the above question is yes, or no?
@Horace said in Mildly interesting:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Mildly interesting:
Asking the hard questions.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/scott-morrison-mcdonalds
DID THE PRIME MINISTER OF AUSTRALIA SHIT HIS PANTS IN A MCDONALD’S?
The answer to the following question implies a great deal about one's own psychology: Would you prefer to live in a world in which the answer to the above question is yes, or no?
There's a plaque.
Please love yourself.
-
@Horace said in Mildly interesting:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Mildly interesting:
Asking the hard questions.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/scott-morrison-mcdonalds
DID THE PRIME MINISTER OF AUSTRALIA SHIT HIS PANTS IN A MCDONALD’S?
The answer to the following question implies a great deal about one's own psychology: Would you prefer to live in a world in which the answer to the above question is yes, or no?
There's a plaque.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Mildly interesting:
@Horace said in Mildly interesting:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Mildly interesting:
Asking the hard questions.
https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/scott-morrison-mcdonalds
DID THE PRIME MINISTER OF AUSTRALIA SHIT HIS PANTS IN A MCDONALD’S?
The answer to the following question implies a great deal about one's own psychology: Would you prefer to live in a world in which the answer to the above question is yes, or no?
There's a plaque.
No. Plaque is on your teeth. There might be a coprolite in a while though.
-
-
Last Friday I bought some stuff at a convenience store/Shell station on Hatteras Island for $30.80.
Today I was checking the VISA account and there were 2 charges for $30.80, one on Friday and one on Sunday.
I called VISA to report a duplicate charge.
I did buy fuel on Sunday, but I figured there was no way it was exactly $30.80 worth of fuel.
I had a receipt from Friday but not Sunday because the fuel pump printer was broken.
After reporting the duplicate to VISA I remembered that I had taken a picture of the pump because someone had put a Biden sticker on it.
Now I am waiting on hold to tell VISA to forget about the dispute.
So Mr. Biden saved the Blue Whale convenience store from the hassle of disputing the dispute.
-
-
There is hope:
The universe could possibly avoid eternal heat death through random quantum tunneling and quantum fluctuations, given the non-zero probability of producing a new Big Bang in roughly 10^10^10^56 years
from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe
-
There is hope:
The universe could possibly avoid eternal heat death through random quantum tunneling and quantum fluctuations, given the non-zero probability of producing a new Big Bang in roughly 10^10^10^56 years
from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe
@Klaus said in Mildly interesting:
The universe could possibly avoid eternal heat death through random quantum tunneling and quantum fluctuations, given the non-zero probability of producing a new Big Bang in roughly 10^10^10^56 years
Oh, thank you. That clears it all up nicely.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login