Engineered
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 12:05 last edited by
Buzzfeed got a FOIA approval for Fauci's emails - thousands of them.
Here's an interesting one from Feb 1, 2000, where he is told that it's unlikely that this is a natural mutation.
"some of the features (potentially) look engineered"
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 12:13 last edited by
Lots more stuff in those emails. I posted an article yesterday about the Biden Whitehouse putting pressure on Fauci to go away.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 15:17 last edited by Copper 6 Mar 2021, 15:18
Tucker was showing these emails last night
The most important thing he said was that the other news outlets will cover this in a different way
What way is that, you might ask.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 15:21 last edited by
Analysis by Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
Fauci's emails are like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in them reveals more about you than the ink blot, or, in this case, the emails.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 15:22 last edited by
I tell you what I didn't know until today - Fauci is 80 years old!
There's hope for some of you old farts, yet!
-
Analysis by Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
Fauci's emails are like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in them reveals more about you than the ink blot, or, in this case, the emails.
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 15:38 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Engineered:
Analysis by Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
Fauci's emails are like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in them reveals more about you than the ink blot, or, in this case, the emails.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 16:02 last edited by
Unlike Rand Paul, who pretty much everybody agrees is a dick?
-
Analysis by Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
Fauci's emails are like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in them reveals more about you than the ink blot, or, in this case, the emails.
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 16:07 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Engineered:
Analysis by Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
Fauci's emails are like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in them reveals more about you than the ink blot, or, in this case, the emails.
How insightful of Tara. She could write a computer program to provide this analysis for every piece of information with any political valence. <That information> is like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in it reveals more about you than the ink blot, or in this case <the information>.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Engineered:
Analysis by Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
Fauci's emails are like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in them reveals more about you than the ink blot, or, in this case, the emails.
How insightful of Tara. She could write a computer program to provide this analysis for every piece of information with any political valence. <That information> is like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in it reveals more about you than the ink blot, or in this case <the information>.
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 16:33 last edited by Doctor Phibes 6 Mar 2021, 16:34@horace said in Engineered:
@doctor-phibes said in Engineered:
Analysis by Tara McKelvey, BBC White House reporter
Fauci's emails are like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in them reveals more about you than the ink blot, or, in this case, the emails.
How insightful of Tara. She could write a computer program to provide this analysis for every piece of information with any political valence. <That information> is like a Rorschach ink blot: what you see in it reveals more about you than the ink blot, or in this case <the information>.
So, for example, if you think that Donald J. Trump doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs and peep about to find ourselves dishonorable graves, then you're either a bloody nutter, or Donald J. Trump.
-
Tucker was showing these emails last night
The most important thing he said was that the other news outlets will cover this in a different way
What way is that, you might ask.
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 16:34 last edited by@copper said in Engineered:
Tucker was showing these emails last night
The most important thing he said was that the other news outlets will cover this in a different way
What way is that, you might ask.
OMG! Not TUCKER!!
-
@copper said in Engineered:
Tucker was showing these emails last night
The most important thing he said was that the other news outlets will cover this in a different way
What way is that, you might ask.
OMG! Not TUCKER!!
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 16:54 last edited by -
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 16:56 last edited by Loki 6 Mar 2021, 16:56
I challenge any human being to survive all their voice, text and email scrutiny. It is a simple task if you have the data to undermine ANYONE. - by cherry picking one sentence. We are all hypocrites.
This is just classic opposition research.
Making Fauci the boogeyman is hilarious.
-
I challenge any human being to survive all their voice, text and email scrutiny. It is a simple task if you have the data to undermine ANYONE. - by cherry picking one sentence. We are all hypocrites.
This is just classic opposition research.
Making Fauci the boogeyman is hilarious.
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 17:18 last edited by@loki said in Engineered:
I challenge any human being to survive all their voice, text and email scrutiny. It is a simple task if you have the data to undermine ANYONE. - by cherry picking one sentence. We are all hypocrites.
This is just classic opposition research.
Making Fauci the boogeyman is hilarious.
Yes, it's ridiculous.
If anybody's ever been involved in a lawsuit, you'll know what an awful experience it is. You're told to leave all of your old emails untouched, and they're made available to lawyers, to do with as they will. Once it's happened, you think about those funny little emails that everybody sends and receives very differently.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 19:27 last edited by
A different take on private Fauci emails.
-
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 20:01 last edited by
Revealing these "private emails" isn't like sneaking a peek at your sister's diary
The question is, did this man authorize funding for the research that created the covid-19 virus?
At a minimum, we should ask him not to repeat this sort of thing
Maybe later we can get into the reparations for over 3 million lives
-
Revealing these "private emails" isn't like sneaking a peek at your sister's diary
The question is, did this man authorize funding for the research that created the covid-19 virus?
At a minimum, we should ask him not to repeat this sort of thing
Maybe later we can get into the reparations for over 3 million lives
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 20:55 last edited by@copper said in Engineered:
Revealing these "private emails" isn't like sneaking a peek at your sister's diary
He should have set up a private server in his basement.
-
@loki said in Engineered:
I challenge any human being to survive all their voice, text and email scrutiny. It is a simple task if you have the data to undermine ANYONE. - by cherry picking one sentence. We are all hypocrites.
This is just classic opposition research.
Making Fauci the boogeyman is hilarious.
Yes, it's ridiculous.
If anybody's ever been involved in a lawsuit, you'll know what an awful experience it is. You're told to leave all of your old emails untouched, and they're made available to lawyers, to do with as they will. Once it's happened, you think about those funny little emails that everybody sends and receives very differently.
wrote on 3 Jun 2021, 21:29 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Engineered:
@loki said in Engineered:
I challenge any human being to survive all their voice, text and email scrutiny. It is a simple task if you have the data to undermine ANYONE. - by cherry picking one sentence. We are all hypocrites.
This is just classic opposition research.
Making Fauci the boogeyman is hilarious.
Yes, it's ridiculous.
If anybody's ever been involved in a lawsuit, you'll know what an awful experience it is. You're told to leave all of your old emails untouched, and they're made available to lawyers, to do with as they will. Once it's happened, you think about those funny little emails that everybody sends and receives very differently.
This!
I was deposed once. It was hilarious. An email was slid across the table and the lawyer said well comment on this. I couldn’t remember the email. I said this is four years old and I literally deal with hundreds of emails a day and that I could provide many other emails that would provide context and my real point of view. They promptly dropped that line of questioning.
