India and Ivermectin
-
Maitt Taibbi: "Shut up," they explained.
a pulmonologist named Dr. Pierre Kory, insisted he had great news.
“We have a solution to this crisis,” he said unequivocally. “There is a drug that is proving to have a miraculous impact.”
Kory was referring to an FDA-approved medicine called ivermectin. A genuine wonder drug in other realms, ivermectin has all but eliminated parasitic diseases like river blindness and elephantiasis, helping discoverer Satoshi Ōmura win the Nobel Prize in 2015. As far as its uses in the pandemic went, however, research was still scant. Could it really be a magic Covid-19 bullet?
Kory had been trying to make such a case, but complained to the Senate that public efforts had been stifled, because “every time we mention ivermectin, we get put in Facebook jail.” A Catch-22 seemed to be ensnaring science. With the world desperate for news about an unprecedented disaster, Silicon Valley had essentially decided to disallow discussion of a potential solution — disallow calls for more research and more study — because not enough research and study had been done. Once, people weren’t allowed to take drugs before they got FDA approval. Now, they can’t talk about them.
“I want to try to be respectful because I think the intention is correct,” Kory told the committee. “They want to cut down on misinformation, and many doctors are claiming X, Y, and Z work in this disease. The challenge is, you’re also silencing those of us who are expert, reasoned, researched, and extremely knowledgeable.”
Eight million people watched Kory say that on the C-SPAN video of the hearing posted to YouTube, but YouTube, in what appears to be a first, removed video of the hearing, as even Senate testimony was now deemed too dangerous for public consumption. YouTube later suspended the Wisconsin Senator who’d invited Kory to the hearing, and when Kory went on podcasts to tell his story, YouTube took down those videos, too. Kory was like a ghost who floated through the Internet, leaving suspensions and blackened warning screens everywhere he went.
One of the challenges of the pandemic period is the degree to which science has become intertwined with politics. Arguments about the efficacy of mask use or ventilators, or the viability of repurposed drugs like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, or even the pandemic’s origins, were quashed from the jump in the American commercial press, which committed itself to a regime of simplified insta-takes made opposite to Donald Trump’s comments. With a few exceptions, Internet censors generally tracked with this conventional wisdom, which had the effect of moving conspiracy theories and real scientific debates alike far underground.
-
Maitt Taibbi: "Shut up," they explained.
a pulmonologist named Dr. Pierre Kory, insisted he had great news.
“We have a solution to this crisis,” he said unequivocally. “There is a drug that is proving to have a miraculous impact.”
Kory was referring to an FDA-approved medicine called ivermectin. A genuine wonder drug in other realms, ivermectin has all but eliminated parasitic diseases like river blindness and elephantiasis, helping discoverer Satoshi Ōmura win the Nobel Prize in 2015. As far as its uses in the pandemic went, however, research was still scant. Could it really be a magic Covid-19 bullet?
Kory had been trying to make such a case, but complained to the Senate that public efforts had been stifled, because “every time we mention ivermectin, we get put in Facebook jail.” A Catch-22 seemed to be ensnaring science. With the world desperate for news about an unprecedented disaster, Silicon Valley had essentially decided to disallow discussion of a potential solution — disallow calls for more research and more study — because not enough research and study had been done. Once, people weren’t allowed to take drugs before they got FDA approval. Now, they can’t talk about them.
“I want to try to be respectful because I think the intention is correct,” Kory told the committee. “They want to cut down on misinformation, and many doctors are claiming X, Y, and Z work in this disease. The challenge is, you’re also silencing those of us who are expert, reasoned, researched, and extremely knowledgeable.”
Eight million people watched Kory say that on the C-SPAN video of the hearing posted to YouTube, but YouTube, in what appears to be a first, removed video of the hearing, as even Senate testimony was now deemed too dangerous for public consumption. YouTube later suspended the Wisconsin Senator who’d invited Kory to the hearing, and when Kory went on podcasts to tell his story, YouTube took down those videos, too. Kory was like a ghost who floated through the Internet, leaving suspensions and blackened warning screens everywhere he went.
One of the challenges of the pandemic period is the degree to which science has become intertwined with politics. Arguments about the efficacy of mask use or ventilators, or the viability of repurposed drugs like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, or even the pandemic’s origins, were quashed from the jump in the American commercial press, which committed itself to a regime of simplified insta-takes made opposite to Donald Trump’s comments. With a few exceptions, Internet censors generally tracked with this conventional wisdom, which had the effect of moving conspiracy theories and real scientific debates alike far underground.
-
Is the question whether Ivermectin is an alternative to taking the vaccine in the US? Not following the argument?
Why would India care about US politics if there was a cheap cure?
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Is the question whether Ivermectin is an alternative to taking the vaccine in the US? Not following the argument?
I don't think so. Vaccination is not a treatment, it's preventative. Ivermectin and the drug-that-shall-not-be-named were/are being suggested as treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality.
-
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Is the question whether Ivermectin is an alternative to taking the vaccine in the US? Not following the argument?
I don't think so. Vaccination is not a treatment, it's preventative. Ivermectin and the drug-that-shall-not-be-named were/are being suggested as treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality.
@george-k said in India and Ivermectin:
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Is the question whether Ivermectin is an alternative to taking the vaccine in the US? Not following the argument?
I don't think so. Vaccination is not a treatment, it's preventative. Ivermectin and the drug-that-shall-not-be-named were/are being suggested as treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Treatment for who in the US? Seems like prevention is the answer, why would you dick with a treatment and create noise in the media? Politics?
-
@george-k said in India and Ivermectin:
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Is the question whether Ivermectin is an alternative to taking the vaccine in the US? Not following the argument?
I don't think so. Vaccination is not a treatment, it's preventative. Ivermectin and the drug-that-shall-not-be-named were/are being suggested as treatments to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Treatment for who in the US? Seems like prevention is the answer, why would you dick with a treatment and create noise in the media? Politics?
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Treatment for who in the US? Seems like prevention is the answer, why would you dick with a treatment and create noise in the media? Politics?
Of course prevention is the answer. But it's not 100% as we all know.
Once you GET the disease, what are you going to do? The only thing that seems to mitigate is supportive therapies (some of which have been shown to be potentially harmful).
Taibbi's point, however, is that despite "believe the science," the people who want to even discuss it are shut down and silenced. They may be wrong, but they may be right, but we'll never know because they're not allowed to talk about it.
Galileo wept.
-
And too many people have been told by the MSM that Plaquenil is BAD! Ivermectin is BAD! You, you charlatan, are spreading misinformation! You MUST be shut down and deplatformed.
What a crock of absolute horseshit.
It's the art of medicine, not necessarily the science. Yes. science plays a huge role in medicine, but you still have to treat patients with what works. Many moons ago, low level village folk healers often had herbs and concoctions that actually worked...They didn't know why they worked, but they did. Boil some willow bark and drink the tea, next time you have a fever and see if it works.
A lot of doctors think these two drugs we're talking about work, if given at the right stage of the disease and with the appropriate cocktail. Maybe these docs are wrong. Maybe they're right. If they're right, even for a small percentage of people, it's significant.
Let's do the appropriate studies, which includes not giving the drugs to somebody at death's door and then proclaiming it doesn't work, when nothing else would, either.
Let's follow the science. Let's do the studies. But let's not stifle the debate on what works and what does not.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
And too many people have been told by the MSM that Plaquenil is BAD! Ivermectin is BAD! You, you charlatan, are spreading misinformation! You MUST be shut down and deplatformed.
What a crock of absolute horseshit.
It's the art of medicine, not necessarily the science. Yes. science plays a huge role in medicine, but you still have to treat patients with what works. Many moons ago, low level village folk healers often had herbs and concoctions that actually worked...They didn't know why they worked, but they did. Boil some willow bark and drink the tea, next time you have a fever and see if it works.
A lot of doctors think these two drugs we're talking about work, if given at the right stage of the disease and with the appropriate cocktail. Maybe these docs are wrong. Maybe they're right. If they're right, even for a small percentage of people, it's significant.
Let's do the appropriate studies, which includes not giving the drugs to somebody at death's door and then proclaiming it doesn't work, when nothing else would, either.
Let's follow the science. Let's do the studies. But let's not stifle the debate on what works and what does not.
-
And too many people have been told by the MSM that Plaquenil is BAD! Ivermectin is BAD! You, you charlatan, are spreading misinformation! You MUST be shut down and deplatformed.
What a crock of absolute horseshit.
It's the art of medicine, not necessarily the science. Yes. science plays a huge role in medicine, but you still have to treat patients with what works. Many moons ago, low level village folk healers often had herbs and concoctions that actually worked...They didn't know why they worked, but they did. Boil some willow bark and drink the tea, next time you have a fever and see if it works.
A lot of doctors think these two drugs we're talking about work, if given at the right stage of the disease and with the appropriate cocktail. Maybe these docs are wrong. Maybe they're right. If they're right, even for a small percentage of people, it's significant.
Let's do the appropriate studies, which includes not giving the drugs to somebody at death's door and then proclaiming it doesn't work, when nothing else would, either.
Let's follow the science. Let's do the studies. But let's not stifle the debate on what works and what does not.
-
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Treatment for who in the US? Seems like prevention is the answer, why would you dick with a treatment and create noise in the media? Politics?
Of course prevention is the answer. But it's not 100% as we all know.
Once you GET the disease, what are you going to do? The only thing that seems to mitigate is supportive therapies (some of which have been shown to be potentially harmful).
Taibbi's point, however, is that despite "believe the science," the people who want to even discuss it are shut down and silenced. They may be wrong, but they may be right, but we'll never know because they're not allowed to talk about it.
Galileo wept.
@george-k said in India and Ivermectin:
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Treatment for who in the US? Seems like prevention is the answer, why would you dick with a treatment and create noise in the media? Politics?
Of course prevention is the answer. But it's not 100% as we all know.
Once you GET the disease, what are you going to do? The only thing that seems to mitigate is supportive therapies (some of which have been shown to be potentially harmful).
Taibbi's point, however, is that despite "believe the science," the people who want to even discuss it are shut down and silenced. They may be wrong, but they may be right, but we'll never know because they're not allowed to talk about it.
Galileo wept.
It seems like the pro ivermectin crowd is the anti-vax crowd and if it worked so well poor countries would eat it up. Occam’s razor.
-
@george-k said in India and Ivermectin:
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Treatment for who in the US? Seems like prevention is the answer, why would you dick with a treatment and create noise in the media? Politics?
Of course prevention is the answer. But it's not 100% as we all know.
Once you GET the disease, what are you going to do? The only thing that seems to mitigate is supportive therapies (some of which have been shown to be potentially harmful).
Taibbi's point, however, is that despite "believe the science," the people who want to even discuss it are shut down and silenced. They may be wrong, but they may be right, but we'll never know because they're not allowed to talk about it.
Galileo wept.
It seems like the pro ivermectin crowd is the anti-vax crowd and if it worked so well poor countries would eat it up. Occam’s razor.
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
@george-k said in India and Ivermectin:
@loki said in India and Ivermectin:
Treatment for who in the US? Seems like prevention is the answer, why would you dick with a treatment and create noise in the media? Politics?
Of course prevention is the answer. But it's not 100% as we all know.
Once you GET the disease, what are you going to do? The only thing that seems to mitigate is supportive therapies (some of which have been shown to be potentially harmful).
Taibbi's point, however, is that despite "believe the science," the people who want to even discuss it are shut down and silenced. They may be wrong, but they may be right, but we'll never know because they're not allowed to talk about it.
Galileo wept.
It seems like the pro ivermectin crowd is the anti-vax crowd and if it worked so well poor countries would eat it up. Occam’s razor.
Wielded by balaam's ass?
