Anti-vaxxers at CDC?

[George K]

Perhaps the unvaccinated were not "eligible"...

Still, I'd like to see an explanation.

[Jolly]

I think they would be considered essential and would be first in line.

Seriously, I think 35% or better of healthcare hasn't bothered....

[Axtremus]

@jolly said in Anti-vaxxers at CDC?:

I think they would be considered essential and would be first in line.

The folks who collect samples and do test in the labs are “frontline.” But the folks who only do statistical analyses, modeling, and write reports are “office workers” who can just “work from home.” I don‘t see why these “office workers” need to be first in line.

[LuFins Dad]

@jolly said in Anti-vaxxers at CDC?:

I think they would be considered essential and would be first in line.

Seriously, I think 35% or better of healthcare hasn't bothered....

Why is that?

[Jolly]

@lufins-dad said in Anti-vaxxers at CDC?:

@jolly said in Anti-vaxxers at CDC?:

I think they would be considered essential and would be first in line.

Seriously, I think 35% or better of healthcare hasn't bothered....

Why is that?

That's a very good question.

A lot of guys in the hospital wouldn't take the flu shot until they made it mandatory...

[Copper]

@lufins-dad said in Anti-vaxxers at CDC?:

@jolly said in Anti-vaxxers at CDC?:

I think they would be considered essential and would be first in line.

Seriously, I think 35% or better of healthcare hasn't bothered....

Why is that?

Because they know.