Bill, we hardly knew ye....
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 12:11 last edited by
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 12:11 last edited by
This is very hard to imagine.
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 12:17 last edited by
Maybe he should have pursued the European model...Obtain a nice mistress and change out as needed...
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 12:55 last edited by
@mik said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
This is very hard to imagine.
Read Xenon's thread about practicing several times a day to learn a new thing.
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 13:17 last edited by
@mik said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
This is very hard to imagine.
Fake news abound. Wait for independent confirmation.
-
@mik said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
This is very hard to imagine.
Fake news abound. Wait for independent confirmation.
wrote on 13 May 2021, 16:11 last edited by@axtremus said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
@mik said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
This is very hard to imagine.
Fake news abound. Wait for independent confirmation.
Ax, what is "independent confirmation"? Could you elaborate on what this is and how it works in context to judging news stories? Thanks in advance!
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 17:48 last edited by
I have to say it would be amazing if Gates were able to hide it until now.
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 18:10 last edited by Horace
I recall stories of the Google guys having wild parties on their private jumbo jets, back in the day. If billionaires want this sort of stuff, of course they can have it. It doesn't seem like it would be too hard to keep quiet, as long as everything is legal.
-
I recall stories of the Google guys having wild parties on their private jumbo jets, back in the day. If billionaires want this sort of stuff, of course they can have it. It doesn't seem like it would be too hard to keep quiet, as long as everything is legal.
wrote on 13 May 2021, 18:21 last edited by@horace said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
I recall stories of the Google guys having wild parties on their private jumbo jets, back in the day. If billionaires want this sort of stuff, of course they can have it. It doesn't seem like it would be too hard to keep quiet, as long as everything is legal.
Except that they've apparently failed at keeping it quiet, as finally somebody broke the secret Billionaire Code of Silence and told Amanda Prestigiacomo of The Daily Wire almost all about it.
-
@horace said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
I recall stories of the Google guys having wild parties on their private jumbo jets, back in the day. If billionaires want this sort of stuff, of course they can have it. It doesn't seem like it would be too hard to keep quiet, as long as everything is legal.
Except that they've apparently failed at keeping it quiet, as finally somebody broke the secret Billionaire Code of Silence and told Amanda Prestigiacomo of The Daily Wire almost all about it.
wrote on 13 May 2021, 18:24 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
@horace said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
I recall stories of the Google guys having wild parties on their private jumbo jets, back in the day. If billionaires want this sort of stuff, of course they can have it. It doesn't seem like it would be too hard to keep quiet, as long as everything is legal.
Except that they've apparently failed at keeping it quiet, as finally somebody broke the secret Billionaire Code of Silence and told Amanda Prestigiacomo of The Daily Wire almost all about it.
It wouldn't really have been news till recently.
I wonder how many people knew at the time that JFK treated the white house interns as his own personal harem, including lending them to friends?
-
@axtremus said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
@mik said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
This is very hard to imagine.
Fake news abound. Wait for independent confirmation.
Ax, what is "independent confirmation"? Could you elaborate on what this is and how it works in context to judging news stories? Thanks in advance!
wrote on 13 May 2021, 23:17 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
Ax, what is "independent confirmation"? Could you elaborate on what this is and how it works in context to judging news stories?
A separate source of information that does not derive its information from the source that gave the Daily Wire the information for its reporting on this story. The more such independent sources provide the same information, the more believable the story.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
Ax, what is "independent confirmation"? Could you elaborate on what this is and how it works in context to judging news stories?
A separate source of information that does not derive its information from the source that gave the Daily Wire the information for its reporting on this story. The more such independent sources provide the same information, the more believable the story.
wrote on 13 May 2021, 23:19 last edited by@axtremus said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
@aqua-letifer said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
Ax, what is "independent confirmation"? Could you elaborate on what this is and how it works in context to judging news stories?
A separate source of information that does not derive its information from the source that gave the Daily Wire the information for its reporting on this story. The more such independent sources provide the same information, the more believable the story.
What if the original news source says they verified with multiple independent sources? Or what if two difference news sources refuse to identify their sources, and you cannot know if the sources are different?
-
@axtremus said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
@aqua-letifer said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
Ax, what is "independent confirmation"? Could you elaborate on what this is and how it works in context to judging news stories?
A separate source of information that does not derive its information from the source that gave the Daily Wire the information for its reporting on this story. The more such independent sources provide the same information, the more believable the story.
What if the original news source says they verified with multiple independent sources? Or what if two difference news sources refuse to identify their sources, and you cannot know if the sources are different?
wrote on 13 May 2021, 23:21 last edited by@horace said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
What if the original news source says they verified with multiple independent sources? Or what if two difference news sources refuse to identify their sources, and you cannot know if the sources are different?
Then you discount your confidence in the story accordingly.
-
wrote on 13 May 2021, 23:23 last edited by
Just like you did with all the anonymous stories about Trump.
-
@horace said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
What if the original news source says they verified with multiple independent sources? Or what if two difference news sources refuse to identify their sources, and you cannot know if the sources are different?
Then you discount your confidence in the story accordingly.
wrote on 13 May 2021, 23:24 last edited by@axtremus said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
@horace said in Bill, we hardly knew ye....:
What if the original news source says they verified with multiple independent sources? Or what if two difference news sources refuse to identify their sources, and you cannot know if the sources are different?
Then you discount your confidence in the story accordingly.
I'm just looking for an objective threshold where I can honestly think to myself that I believe a story based on independent verification. I'd hate for it to come down to some sort of subjective judgment call. That's what independent verification is supposed to avoid.
-
wrote on 14 May 2021, 01:07 last edited by
-
wrote on 14 May 2021, 02:08 last edited by
I kind of agree that this would be very difficult to keep quiet, so I kind of doubt it happened.
In todays world, where people are willing to do (almost) anything to be famous for a few moments, and there are so may ways to get stuff to the public without waiting for a "traditional" news source, seems a bit unlikely.
-
wrote on 14 May 2021, 02:57 last edited by
How long did they keep the Lolita Express quiet?
-
wrote on 14 May 2021, 20:41 last edited by
At that point in time, it didn't need to be kept quiet... A rich single guy paying strippers to swim naked in his pool wasn't really anybody else's business...
But back in 1990, Bill Gates wasn't the philanthropist that he is now. He was a self-admitted asshole and jerk. Nobody cared that he was blowing his money on strippers.
-
wrote on 17 May 2021, 11:28 last edited by
20 years ago:
Microsoft Corp. board members decided that Bill Gates needed to step down from its board in 2020 as they pursued an investigation into the billionaire’s prior romantic relationship with a female Microsoft employee that was deemed inappropriate, people familiar with the matter said.
Members of the board tasked with the matter hired a law firm to conduct an investigation in late 2019 after a Microsoft engineer alleged in a letter that she had a sexual relationship over years with Mr. Gates, the people said.
During the probe, some board members decided it was no longer suitable for Mr. Gates to sit as a director at the software company he started and led for decades, the people said. Mr. Gates resigned before the board’s investigation was completed and before the full board could make a formal decision on the matter, another person familiar with the matter said.
“Microsoft received a concern in the latter half of 2019 that Bill Gates sought to initiate an intimate relationship with a company employee in the year 2000,” a Microsoft spokesman said. “A committee of the Board reviewed the concern, aided by an outside law firm to conduct a thorough investigation. Throughout the investigation, Microsoft provided extensive support to the employee who raised the concern.”
A spokeswoman for Mr. Gates said, “There was an affair almost 20 years ago which ended amicably.” She said his “decision to transition off the board was in no way related to this matter. In fact, he had expressed an interest in spending more time on his philanthropy starting several years earlier.”
