The Kraken is Backtrackin’
-
Trump supporters are better looking than Biden supporters and also smarter.
Do you know why Biden loves the Oval Office so much? Because it’s the only room where Kamala can’t tell him to go sit in the corner.
in a couple years, the only Biden supporter will be his walker.
Biden is the ultimate contradiction. A guy who was born in the 1800s but who is so dumb, he seems like he was born yesterday.
Biden is a white male with a track record of never questioning his gender identity or his sexuality. And yet we’re supposed to trust him?
-
If you like listening to talking heads on TV who reinforce and confirm what you already believe, I'm sure Tucker's great. I've never understood the appeal of these shows, left or right.
I can't even watch the evening entertainment shows any more over here. You guys are fucking obsessed with politics. It's all they talk about. They even bring over British "comedians" to go on about it now, presumably with the idea that James Corden and John Oliver sound more sophisticated. A Brummie!
Personally, I'd rather spend an hour walking my dog.
-
@horace said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@kluurs said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
The Tucker Carlson defense. Worked for him.
Plenty of people seem to think he's a great thinker.
Definitely smarter and more interesting than any talking head I’m aware of on left leaning news television.
Objectively true. Seriously.
-
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
-
@Doctor-Phibes, you may get a chance to have to work even harder to avoid watching or hearing Tucker Carlson. He might run for President.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
Name an alternative. Name a smarter talking head. The way you put it, it’s as if there are many. Let’s hear who you think is smarter. And by the way I can think of many smart people who I think are dreadful.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
Well, you'll always have Rachel...
-
@jolly said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
Well, you'll always have Rachel...
Well there you go, she is very smart and dreadful.
-
@loki said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
Name an alternative. Name a smarter talking head. The way you put it, it’s as if there are many. Let’s hear who you think is smarter. And by the way I can think of many smart people who I think are dreadful.
I don't listen to any of them, so I honestly don't know. My objection is that you state an opinion using inherently subjective terms as though it's a fact.
'Smarter' - ok, you can probably test that, although that's debatable. 'More interesting' - that's not an objective measure. I don't find him interesting, which is why I don't watch him.
'Conservatives tend to think that Tucker Carlson is smarter and more interesting than a bunch of people they don't agree with' is closer to the mark.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@loki said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
Name an alternative. Name a smarter talking head. The way you put it, it’s as if there are many. Let’s hear who you think is smarter. And by the way I can think of many smart people who I think are dreadful.
I don't listen to any of them, so I honestly don't know. My objection is that you state an opinion using inherently subjective terms as though it's a fact.
'Smarter' - ok, you can probably test that, although that's debatable. 'More interesting' - that's not an objective measure. I don't find him interesting, which is why I don't watch him.
'Conservatives tend to think that Tucker Carlson is smarter and more interesting than a bunch of people they don't agree with' is closer to the mark.
I never said anything about interesting. Liberals love to call people stupid, that is their thing. So it just needs to be corrected early and often.
-
@loki said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@loki said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
Name an alternative. Name a smarter talking head. The way you put it, it’s as if there are many. Let’s hear who you think is smarter. And by the way I can think of many smart people who I think are dreadful.
I don't listen to any of them, so I honestly don't know. My objection is that you state an opinion using inherently subjective terms as though it's a fact.
'Smarter' - ok, you can probably test that, although that's debatable. 'More interesting' - that's not an objective measure. I don't find him interesting, which is why I don't watch him.
'Conservatives tend to think that Tucker Carlson is smarter and more interesting than a bunch of people they don't agree with' is closer to the mark.
I never said anything about interesting. Liberals love to call people stupid, that is their thing. So it just needs to be corrected early and often.
You replied to Horace's comment that Tucker was smarter and more interesting than any other commentators by saying it was objectively true.
And 'smarter' is a matter of opinion. I never said he was stupid.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@loki said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@loki said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Of course, you are fully entitled to your opinion regarding what is objectively true, however I think he's dreadful.
Name an alternative. Name a smarter talking head. The way you put it, it’s as if there are many. Let’s hear who you think is smarter. And by the way I can think of many smart people who I think are dreadful.
I don't listen to any of them, so I honestly don't know. My objection is that you state an opinion using inherently subjective terms as though it's a fact.
'Smarter' - ok, you can probably test that, although that's debatable. 'More interesting' - that's not an objective measure. I don't find him interesting, which is why I don't watch him.
'Conservatives tend to think that Tucker Carlson is smarter and more interesting than a bunch of people they don't agree with' is closer to the mark.
I never said anything about interesting. Liberals love to call people stupid, that is their thing. So it just needs to be corrected early and often.
You replied to Horace's comment that Tucker was smarter and more interesting than any other commentators by saying it was objectively true.
And 'smarter' is a matter of opinion. I never said he was stupid.
Ok. You are right. My statement included more interesting and that is very debatable. I only really watched him when cross fire was a show and I have seen him speak live (he was one of many at a non political conference.
-
@horace said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Carlson’s monologues get posted here sometimes when they are particularly good. By all means I hope those who consider him an unintelligent and uninteresting twat listen and comment next time.
Once again, I didn't say he was unintelligent.
I don't particularly like monologues, and I don't like Tucker Carlson.
You guys whine and whine about how awful the mainstream media is, but you really only mean the stuff you don't agree with. I dislike all of it.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@horace said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
Carlson’s monologues get posted here sometimes when they are particularly good. By all means I hope those who consider him an unintelligent and uninteresting twat listen and comment next time.
Once again, I didn't say he was unintelligent.
I don't particularly like monologues, and I don't like Tucker Carlson.
You guys whine and whine about how awful the mainstream media is, but you really only mean the stuff you don't agree with. I dislike all of it.
"Both sides are equal and opposite garbage" would be an interesting perspective if I couldn't name five other posters on this board alone who think that way. It's not a point, it's a punt. And definitely not a thoughtful one.
Anyway, if Carlson is posted about here again, I'll try to remember to ping you so you have an opportunity to explain why he's talking bollocks. It's too bad you haven't taken any such opportunity the previous 20 times he's been posted about here.
-
You know those people who are really, really into Bob Marley, or Van Morrisson, or some other pop singer, and however many times you tell them you don't like them, they keep playing you their stuff to listen to?
I don't. Fucking. Like. Talking Heads. On TV.
I don't mind the band Talking Heads, after a few drinks at least. You can play their stuff. Not the other guys.
-
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
You know those people who are really, really into Bob Marley, or Van Morrisson, or some other pop singer, and however many times you tell them you don't like them, they keep playing you their stuff to listen to?
Maybe I'll give you a tl;dr version next time he's posted about, and you can enlighten us why the synopsis contains bollocks. I don't want you to go out of your way to explain your dismissal of the political tribe you hate most, I just thought maybe it would be a good exercise for you. You'll probably note that most of the right leaning posters here "whining about CNN" are able to specify what it is about their messaging they don't agree with.
-
My personal opinion is that anyone who uses the acronym MSM for mainstream media is so far buried in his/her/them perspective that it’s almost impossible to have a clear conversation.
Me personally. I love the MSM. But that’s because I’m very MS.
-
@horace said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
@doctor-phibes said in The Kraken is Backtrackin’:
You know those people who are really, really into Bob Marley, or Van Morrisson, or some other pop singer, and however many times you tell them you don't like them, they keep playing you their stuff to listen to?
Maybe I'll give you a tl;dr version next time he's posted about, and you can enlighten us why the synopsis contains bollocks. I don't want you to go out of your way to explain your dismissal of the political tribe you hate most, I just thought maybe it would be a good exercise for you. You'll probably note that most of the right leaning posters here "whining about CNN" are able to specify what it is about their messaging they don't agree with.
I'm going to post Charlie Parker videos from YouTube every time you do that. Because Charlie Parker actually was a genius. I am totally uninterested in whether you want to listen to him or not, but I'm going to post them, because he's fucking awesome.
He also managed to wear a bow-tie without looking like a complete cunt.