6.6 million jobless claims.
-
3.3 million was last week, and now it looks not too bad in light of today.
6.6 million.
10 million claims in the space of 8 days.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
I wish Sam Kinison was still alive so he could talk to some of your about your "hurt feelings."
-
Read somewhere just yesterday that 1 in 3 households have someone who has lost his job or has his pay (or hours) cut.
-
-
Only 1 in 3?
-
@George-K This too shall pass.
-
It's HUGE. The old new normal is about to be replaced by a new-new normal.
-
Employment statistics released 2020-04-09:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/09/weekly-jobless-claims-report.html- 6.6 million Americans filing first-time unemployment claims last week
- total claims over the past three weeks now exceed 16 million
It's probably still an undercount because many states' systems cannot take in new unemployment claims fast enough.
-
My old skills are back in demand apparently. Most of these systems are still running COBOL.
"Summon scorn until it radiates from your person like a baleful beacon of contempt."
"I support anyone’s right to be who they want to be. My question is: to what extent do I have to participate in your self-image?" Dave Chappelle
-
I wonder if there will be any fraud.
-
@Mik said in 6.6 million jobless claims.:
My old skills are back in demand apparently. Most of these systems are still running COBOL.
How long would it take to train a C (or name several other languages) programmer in COBOL? Maybe a couple hours, a day or two for the second string.
Assuming you don't have to get too deeply in BL and BLL cells.
-
Python's better.
-
That depends.
-
Python does not run the world. COBOL does.
"Summon scorn until it radiates from your person like a baleful beacon of contempt."
"I support anyone’s right to be who they want to be. My question is: to what extent do I have to participate in your self-image?" Dave Chappelle
-
@Mik No, but it does run big data and machine learning.
-
What do you mean by big data?
-
@Axtremus said in 6.6 million jobless claims.:
Read somewhere just yesterday that 1 in 3 households have someone who has lost his job or has his pay (or hours) cut.
Meanwhile, farmers are having food crops rot in the field.
-
Very long time ago, I wrote COBOL programs.
-
COBOL in school. Had a debugging contract job for a few months, but nothing since.
-
I was the best COBOL programmer I ever knew. My code was clean, structured, efficient and stable. If it went down unexpectedly there were always sufficient breadcrumb trails consistently in the same places where one could find out the where the program was and what data it was looking at. If I detected something wrong and had to abend the program there was always an explicit report in the run logs that told you exactly what happened on what input record or DB call, why it was bad and if possible what to do to fix it and finish the run. Those things are pretty easy to do if you set up the structure right the first time. Everyone loved supporting my stuff because it was so easy.
-
@Mik said in 6.6 million jobless claims.:
My code was clean, structured, efficient and stable.
This might be a fun game:
Provide examples of COBOL code that is not “structured.”
It seems to me the COBOL language specification makes it virtually impossible for any compilable COBOL code to not be structured. From time to time I see C programmers deliberately write obfuscated free-flowing C one-liners that do brilliant things. That does not seem possible with COBOL.
