Tsarnaev Sues
-
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 15:31 last edited by
Tsarnaev says the defendants are violating his First Amendment rights and interfering with his chance to avoid the death penalty by not allowing him to send hobby crafts through the mail to his legal counsel. This constructive behavior, he claimed in the filing, could provide mitigating evidence as prosecutors seek to have the death penalty reinstated. He said the restrictions also interfere with the development of a relationship between him and his defending counsel.
Since 2013, Tsarnaev has been subject to special administrative measures (SAMs) due to his “proclivity to violence,” which may restrict privileges in prison. SAMs must be reviewed and renewed each year.
Tsarnaev claims he has been not been permitted to send photographs to his family since 2019 and that due to the restrictions, “I am suffering psychological injury, emotional distress and destruction of my familial relationships.”
He also claimed he is allowed to have visits with his nieces and nephews but is not allowed to call or write to them, which he said is cruel and unusual punishment. He is allowed to speak to his parents and sisters by phone twice a month.
He said he was issued a face mask due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was reported when the face mask was missing a metal nosepiece. Tsarnaev said the mask was manufactured without the nosepiece and inclusion of the incident as a reason for special administrative measures violated his Fifth Amendment right to due process.
I'm tempted to send him a DVD of Papillon.
-
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 15:42 last edited by
Maybe The Green Mile? Dead Man Walking?
Somehow my sympathy shelf is empty.
-
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 15:52 last edited by Horace
I remember that one time he murdered and maimed a bunch of people, including kids, with pressure cooker bombs.
-
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 15:56 last edited by Loki
Tell him sorry that he is subject to the same justice granted his victims.
Tsarnaev claims he has been not been permitted to send photographs to his family since 2019 and that due to the restrictions, “I am suffering psychological injury, emotional distress and destruction of my familial relationships.”
-
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 16:51 last edited by
Goofy!! He should have been thinking about this 10 years ago.
-
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 17:02 last edited by
Put an end to his suffering
-
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 18:20 last edited by
Knock that sucker in the head with a hammer, and put all of us out of his misery...
-
Tsarnaev says the defendants are violating his First Amendment rights and interfering with his chance to avoid the death penalty by not allowing him to send hobby crafts through the mail to his legal counsel. This constructive behavior, he claimed in the filing, could provide mitigating evidence as prosecutors seek to have the death penalty reinstated. He said the restrictions also interfere with the development of a relationship between him and his defending counsel.
Since 2013, Tsarnaev has been subject to special administrative measures (SAMs) due to his “proclivity to violence,” which may restrict privileges in prison. SAMs must be reviewed and renewed each year.
Tsarnaev claims he has been not been permitted to send photographs to his family since 2019 and that due to the restrictions, “I am suffering psychological injury, emotional distress and destruction of my familial relationships.”
He also claimed he is allowed to have visits with his nieces and nephews but is not allowed to call or write to them, which he said is cruel and unusual punishment. He is allowed to speak to his parents and sisters by phone twice a month.
He said he was issued a face mask due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was reported when the face mask was missing a metal nosepiece. Tsarnaev said the mask was manufactured without the nosepiece and inclusion of the incident as a reason for special administrative measures violated his Fifth Amendment right to due process.
I'm tempted to send him a DVD of Papillon.
wrote on 14 Mar 2021, 23:55 last edited byReading more closely the death penalty is under appeal. It’s the defense counsel’s duty to represent him as best he/she can. If the suit is heard it will be interesting to hear the court’s legal response.