Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Long-Hauler Clinics

Long-Hauler Clinics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
4 Posts 3 Posters 29 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Aqua Letifer
    wrote on 1 Mar 2021, 15:55 last edited by
    #1

    https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/inside-post-covid-clinics-how-specialized-centers-are-trying-treat-n1258879

    Please love yourself.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      George K
      wrote on 1 Mar 2021, 16:03 last edited by
      #2

      D2 is in one of those clinics.

      Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at 10.02.23 AM.png

      Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at 10.01.49 AM.png

      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Aqua Letifer
        wrote on 1 Mar 2021, 16:18 last edited by
        #3

        Isn't it kind of a risk, then, to open schools back up?

        I'm not saying the risks aren't worth taking or that I have any opinion I'm trying to support at all. I'm saying the fact that these cases exist seems to bring the risk level up and it's something that should be considered. But I don't know if it is.

        Please love yourself.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • C Offline
          C Offline
          Copper
          wrote on 1 Mar 2021, 16:41 last edited by
          #4

          Of course, all the risks should be considered.

          Then convert that to total long-term injuries and deaths.

          Then compare that to the number of acceptable long-term injuries and deaths.

          If we are below the acceptable losses, then go for it.

          The problem is that for some reason, your leaders still haven't published the acceptable casualty numbers.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes

          4/4

          1 Mar 2021, 16:41


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          4 out of 4
          • First post
            4/4
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups