The "No Glory for Hate Act"
-
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Heal and unite. Got it.
That was exactly what Trumpsters said would happen four years ago. You cannot possibly be trying to say that Biden is somehow worse.
@aqua-letifer said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Heal and unite. Got it.
That was exactly what Trumpsters said would happen four years ago. You cannot possibly be trying to say that Biden is somehow worse.
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.
-
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/484/text?r=34&s=1
=-=-=-=-=-=
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “No Glory for Hate Act”.
SEC. 2. FEDERAL FUNDS RESTRICTION ON COMMEMORATING CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Notwithstanding section 3102 of title 40, United States Code, no Federal funds may be used to—
(1) create or display any symbol, monument, or statue commemorating any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States on Federal public land, including any highway, park, subway, Federal building, military installation, street, or other Federal property; or
(2) name, designate, or redesignate a Federal building or Federal land after, or in commemoration of, any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.
SEC. 3. RESTRICTION OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR PROPERTY BEARING THE NAME OF CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds or other Federal financial assistance may be provided to a State, political subdivision thereof, or entity if any such funds or financial assistance will be used for the benefit of any building, land, structure, installation, or any other property that bears the name, or is named or designated in commemoration of, any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.
SEC. 4. FORMER PRESIDENTS ACT RESTRICTION.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Act entitled “An Act to provide retirement, clerical assistants, and free mailing privileges to former Presidents of the United States, and for other purposes”, approved August 25, 1958 (3 U.S.C. 102 note; commonly known as the “Former Presidents Act of 1958”), any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States is not entitled to receive any benefit, other than Secret Service protection, under such Act.
SEC. 5. PROHIBITION OF BURIAL OF CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Section 7722(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(3) In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary of Defense shall not approve a determination of eligibility for interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery made by the Secretary of the Army that permits the interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery of any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.”.
@george-k said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/484/text?r=34&s=1
=-=-=-=-=-=
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “No Glory for Hate Act”.
SEC. 2. FEDERAL FUNDS RESTRICTION ON COMMEMORATING CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Notwithstanding section 3102 of title 40, United States Code, no Federal funds may be used to—
(1) create or display any symbol, monument, or statue commemorating any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States on Federal public land, including any highway, park, subway, Federal building, military installation, street, or other Federal property; or
(2) name, designate, or redesignate a Federal building or Federal land after, or in commemoration of, any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.
SEC. 3. RESTRICTION OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR PROPERTY BEARING THE NAME OF CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds or other Federal financial assistance may be provided to a State, political subdivision thereof, or entity if any such funds or financial assistance will be used for the benefit of any building, land, structure, installation, or any other property that bears the name, or is named or designated in commemoration of, any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.
SEC. 4. FORMER PRESIDENTS ACT RESTRICTION.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Act entitled “An Act to provide retirement, clerical assistants, and free mailing privileges to former Presidents of the United States, and for other purposes”, approved August 25, 1958 (3 U.S.C. 102 note; commonly known as the “Former Presidents Act of 1958”), any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States is not entitled to receive any benefit, other than Secret Service protection, under such Act.
SEC. 5. PROHIBITION OF BURIAL OF CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Section 7722(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(3) In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary of Defense shall not approve a determination of eligibility for interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery made by the Secretary of the Army that permits the interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery of any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.”.
I missed the part where we can dig them up and scatter the remains into multiple oceans.
-
@aqua-letifer said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Heal and unite. Got it.
That was exactly what Trumpsters said would happen four years ago. You cannot possibly be trying to say that Biden is somehow worse.
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.Trump incited a Capitol invasion, cry me a fucking river.
Please love yourself.
-
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.Trump incited a Capitol invasion, cry me a fucking river.
@aqua-letifer said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.Trump incited a Capitol invasion, cry me a fucking river.
Don't let hate get in the way of your intelligence.
-
@copper said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not even the doofuses believe that
We need a herd name for doofuses. Similar to “a murder of crows” but appropriate for doofuses. Thoughts? @Aqua-Letifer
-
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/484/text?r=34&s=1
=-=-=-=-=-=
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “No Glory for Hate Act”.
SEC. 2. FEDERAL FUNDS RESTRICTION ON COMMEMORATING CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Notwithstanding section 3102 of title 40, United States Code, no Federal funds may be used to—
(1) create or display any symbol, monument, or statue commemorating any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States on Federal public land, including any highway, park, subway, Federal building, military installation, street, or other Federal property; or
(2) name, designate, or redesignate a Federal building or Federal land after, or in commemoration of, any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.
SEC. 3. RESTRICTION OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR PROPERTY BEARING THE NAME OF CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds or other Federal financial assistance may be provided to a State, political subdivision thereof, or entity if any such funds or financial assistance will be used for the benefit of any building, land, structure, installation, or any other property that bears the name, or is named or designated in commemoration of, any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.
SEC. 4. FORMER PRESIDENTS ACT RESTRICTION.
Notwithstanding any provision of the Act entitled “An Act to provide retirement, clerical assistants, and free mailing privileges to former Presidents of the United States, and for other purposes”, approved August 25, 1958 (3 U.S.C. 102 note; commonly known as the “Former Presidents Act of 1958”), any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States is not entitled to receive any benefit, other than Secret Service protection, under such Act.
SEC. 5. PROHIBITION OF BURIAL OF CERTAIN FORMER PRESIDENTS.
Section 7722(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(3) In carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary of Defense shall not approve a determination of eligibility for interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery made by the Secretary of the Army that permits the interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery of any former President that has been twice impeached by the House of Representatives on or before the date of enactment of this Act or has been convicted of a State or Federal crime relating to actions taken in an official capacity as President of the United States.”.
-
Why don’t they strip her of her committee assignments for foisting this garbage on Congress??
-
@aqua-letifer said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.Trump incited a Capitol invasion, cry me a fucking river.
Don't let hate get in the way of your intelligence.
@jolly said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@aqua-letifer said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.Trump incited a Capitol invasion, cry me a fucking river.
Don't let hate get in the way of your intelligence.
Dont let them rewrite history to fit their narrative.
-
@jolly said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@aqua-letifer said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.Trump incited a Capitol invasion, cry me a fucking river.
Don't let hate get in the way of your intelligence.
Dont let them rewrite history to fit their narrative.
@nobodyssock said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@jolly said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@aqua-letifer said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
@loki said in The "No Glory for Hate Act":
Not at all. His lead is not being followed. He led with healing and unifying the country. He can abandon it. But if it is a goal, I will point out every time that it is not happening .
Putting forth a rhetorical bill is particularly spiteful.Trump incited a Capitol invasion, cry me a fucking river.
Don't let hate get in the way of your intelligence.
Dont let them rewrite history to fit their narrative.
Nobody is rewriting history. You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
