Always look for the helpers
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2021, 12:42 last edited by
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2021, 12:46 last edited by
That’s hilarious
-
wrote on 28 Dec 2022, 19:26 last edited by
-
-
wrote on 28 Dec 2022, 22:26 last edited by
Put Cruz on SCOTUS.
-
wrote on 28 Dec 2022, 22:48 last edited by
@Jolly said in Always look for the helpers:
Put Cruz on SCOTUS.
What’s the difference between Ted Cruz’s wife and the Constitution?
He’ll defend the Constitution.
-
wrote on 28 Dec 2022, 23:03 last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
Did you have to squint to see the difference?
By the way, I just got back from a 4mi walk. It was 43 today. What was the high in a Chicago?
wrote on 28 Dec 2022, 23:48 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Always look for the helpers:
Did you have to squint to see the difference?
Yeah. I did.
Weather disaster in Northeast killing 30+ people. POTUS vacations. Media says "He deserves a break before election."
Weather disaster in Texas, any deaths (I honestly don't know)? Senator vacations. "OMG the horror!"
Someone commented, "What do you expect him to have done?"
Sauce, goose, gander.
The links I posted (and there are others) totally ignore Biden's response to what happened in Buffalo. Probably because there was none (haven't looked).
-
wrote on 29 Dec 2022, 00:15 last edited by jon-nyc
I don’t think people in the northeast today subjectively feel they’re living through a disaster.
Pretty sure that wasn’t the case in texas when Cruz bailed on his state.
-
I don’t think people in the northeast today subjectively feel they’re living through a disaster.
Pretty sure that wasn’t the case in texas when Cruz bailed on his state.
wrote on 29 Dec 2022, 01:40 last edited by@jon-nyc Do you actually think anyone not already predisposed to hate Cruz gave a damn about his travel plans, and that they were not just waiting for marching orders from the propaganda machine to chime in on the outrage du jour?
-
@jon-nyc Do you actually think anyone not already predisposed to hate Cruz gave a damn about his travel plans, and that they were not just waiting for marching orders from the propaganda machine to chime in on the outrage du jour?
wrote on 29 Dec 2022, 01:44 last edited byIf you read the thread I think we were all admiring the scale of the political blunder rather than expressing personal concern about his absence.
-
If you read the thread I think we were all admiring the scale of the political blunder rather than expressing personal concern about his absence.
wrote on 29 Dec 2022, 01:47 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Always look for the helpers:
If you read the thread I think we were all admiring the scale of the political blunder rather than expressing personal concern about his absence.
You're begging the question, but ok.
-
@jon-nyc said in Always look for the helpers:
If you read the thread I think we were all admiring the scale of the political blunder rather than expressing personal concern about his absence.
You're begging the question, but ok.
wrote on 29 Dec 2022, 01:48 last edited by -
wrote on 30 Dec 2022, 03:01 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Dec 2022, 03:43 last edited by
So, this all boils down to TDS?
-
wrote on 30 Dec 2022, 03:48 last edited by jon-nyc
@Jolly said in Always look for the helpers:
So, this all boils down to TDS?
Since you pull out that ad hominem when you can’t defend the action in question then apparently, by your de facto definition, yes.
