Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. To Care

To Care

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
23 Posts 12 Posters 320 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • X Offline
    X Offline
    xenon
    wrote on last edited by xenon
    #21

    The NYT (unless they shadow edited their article) implies that the fire extinguisher blow contributed to his death, but doesn't go so far as to assert it.

    Then on Wednesday, pro-Trump rioters attacked that citadel of democracy, overpowered Mr. Sicknick, 42, and struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials. With a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support. He died on Thursday evening.

    I did also hear that he was bludgeoned to death (from here probably, not reading it from a news article.)

    Does the distinction matter that much though? Is it in dispute he was hit by a fire extinguisher? (I don't know).

    Is it reasonable to assume he died from injuries sustained during this mob action? Does the fire extinguisher being the medical cause of death matter much? The mob did something to him, unless this was some sort of crazy coincidence.

    There's plenty to criticize about NYT, but this seems pretty minor.

    CopperC JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
    • X xenon

      The NYT (unless they shadow edited their article) implies that the fire extinguisher blow contributed to his death, but doesn't go so far as to assert it.

      Then on Wednesday, pro-Trump rioters attacked that citadel of democracy, overpowered Mr. Sicknick, 42, and struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials. With a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support. He died on Thursday evening.

      I did also hear that he was bludgeoned to death (from here probably, not reading it from a news article.)

      Does the distinction matter that much though? Is it in dispute he was hit by a fire extinguisher? (I don't know).

      Is it reasonable to assume he died from injuries sustained during this mob action? Does the fire extinguisher being the medical cause of death matter much? The mob did something to him, unless this was some sort of crazy coincidence.

      There's plenty to criticize about NYT, but this seems pretty minor.

      CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @xenon said in To Care:

      The NYT (unless they shadow edited their article) implies that the fire extinguisher blow contributed to his death, but doesn't go so far as to assert it.

      Then on Wednesday, pro-Trump rioters attacked that citadel of democracy, overpowered Mr. Sicknick, 42, and struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials. With a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support. He died on Thursday evening.

      I did also hear that he was bludgeoned to death (from here probably, not reading it from a news article.)

      Does the distinction matter that much though? Is it in dispute he was hit by a fire extinguisher? (I don't know).

      Is it reasonable to assume he died from injuries sustained during this mob action? Does the fire extinguisher being the medical cause of death matter much? The mob did something to him, unless this was some sort of crazy coincidence.

      There's plenty to criticize about NYT, but this seems pretty minor.

      Watch the extinguisher video

      When did he die?

      1 Reply Last reply
      • X xenon

        The NYT (unless they shadow edited their article) implies that the fire extinguisher blow contributed to his death, but doesn't go so far as to assert it.

        Then on Wednesday, pro-Trump rioters attacked that citadel of democracy, overpowered Mr. Sicknick, 42, and struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials. With a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support. He died on Thursday evening.

        I did also hear that he was bludgeoned to death (from here probably, not reading it from a news article.)

        Does the distinction matter that much though? Is it in dispute he was hit by a fire extinguisher? (I don't know).

        Is it reasonable to assume he died from injuries sustained during this mob action? Does the fire extinguisher being the medical cause of death matter much? The mob did something to him, unless this was some sort of crazy coincidence.

        There's plenty to criticize about NYT, but this seems pretty minor.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @xenon said in To Care:

        The NYT (unless they shadow edited their article) implies that the fire extinguisher blow contributed to his death, but doesn't go so far as to assert it.

        Then on Wednesday, pro-Trump rioters attacked that citadel of democracy, overpowered Mr. Sicknick, 42, and struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials. With a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support. He died on Thursday evening.

        I did also hear that he was bludgeoned to death (from here probably, not reading it from a news article.)

        Does the distinction matter that much though? Is it in dispute he was hit by a fire extinguisher? (I don't know).

        Is it reasonable to assume he died from injuries sustained during this mob action? Does the fire extinguisher being the medical cause of death matter much? The mob did something to him, unless this was some sort of crazy coincidence.

        There's plenty to criticize about NYT, but this seems pretty minor.

        Actually, it's pretty major.

        Getting the facts wrong on a murder is not good for the legal process. Or the political one.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups