Trump Was Right
-
@george-k said in Trump Was Right:
Heh...
That the thing with Twitter — you only get to post 280 characters at a time. If you read that entire article and tweet only the highlighted parts, you are misrepresenting the article and spreading misinformation about the election, and you deserve to be banned.
@axtremus as I said in the post above, this article is, apparently, an introduction of more stuff to come. It will be interesting what evidence they have to confirm what's in the article.
But, the point stands that, if you said there was a "cabal" to deal with the election, with no proof, that you would be banned from Twitter, or at least suspended until you deleted that tweet.
-
@axtremus as I said in the post above, this article is, apparently, an introduction of more stuff to come. It will be interesting what evidence they have to confirm what's in the article.
But, the point stands that, if you said there was a "cabal" to deal with the election, with no proof, that you would be banned from Twitter, or at least suspended until you deleted that tweet.
@george-k said in Trump Was Right:
@axtremus as I said in the post above, this article is, apparently, an introduction of more stuff to come. It will be interesting what evidence they have to confirm what's in the article.
But, the point stands that, if you said there was a "cabal" to deal with the election, with no proof, that you would be banned from Twitter, or at least suspended until you deleted that tweet.
Were you expecting Twitter to ban the TIME Magazine? The TIME Magazine has not posted that "cabal" stuff on Twitter. Someone else, a "Mark Hemingway", took a few screenshots and highlighted a few phrases out of context and post those fragments on Twitter. Why would Twitter ban TIME Magazine if TIME Magazine has not tweeted anything on Twitter that violates Twitter's policies? If anything, maybe Twitter should band "Mark Hemingway" for tweeting stuff that violates Twitter's policies.
-
@george-k said in Trump Was Right:
@axtremus as I said in the post above, this article is, apparently, an introduction of more stuff to come. It will be interesting what evidence they have to confirm what's in the article.
But, the point stands that, if you said there was a "cabal" to deal with the election, with no proof, that you would be banned from Twitter, or at least suspended until you deleted that tweet.
Were you expecting Twitter to ban the TIME Magazine? The TIME Magazine has not posted that "cabal" stuff on Twitter. Someone else, a "Mark Hemingway", took a few screenshots and highlighted a few phrases out of context and post those fragments on Twitter. Why would Twitter ban TIME Magazine if TIME Magazine has not tweeted anything on Twitter that violates Twitter's policies? If anything, maybe Twitter should band "Mark Hemingway" for tweeting stuff that violates Twitter's policies.
-
@george-k said in Trump Was Right:
@axtremus said in Trump Was Right:
The TIME Magazine has not posted that "cabal" stuff on Twitter.
Good, in that tweet the TIME Magazine says the election was saved, not that it was fraudulent or illegitimate. If you wish, feel free to check against Twitter's published Civic Integrity Policy and cite the specific clauses that you think the TIME tweet violated.
-
@george-k said in Trump Was Right:
@axtremus said in Trump Was Right:
The TIME Magazine has not posted that "cabal" stuff on Twitter.
Good, in that tweet the TIME Magazine says the election was saved, not that it was fraudulent or illegitimate. If you wish, feel free to check against Twitter's published Civic Integrity Policy and cite the specific clauses that you think the TIME tweet violated.
-
Sorry, I see the word "conspiracy " in an article, and I start to lose interest.
-
Sorry, I see the word "conspiracy " in an article, and I start to lose interest.
@taiwan_girl said in Trump Was Right:
Sorry, I see the word "conspiracy " in an article, and I start to lose interest.
A fixed election does not matter?
-
First it was a stolen election, now it's a fixed election. What's next in the bowl of sour grapes?
Elbows up!
-
First it was a stolen election, now it's a fixed election. What's next in the bowl of sour grapes?
@renauda said in Trump Was Right:
First it was a stolen election, now it's a fixed election.
Exactly.
The fact is that President Biden fairly got more votes than President Trump. Period! Therefore, he was named the winner. That is how it works.
@jon-nyc Please feel free to chime in about steel strength at 1400 C. LOL
-
First it was a stolen election, now it's a fixed election. What's next in the bowl of sour grapes?
-
I didn't think it was possible for Americans to make their election cycles last longer than the four long, miserable years they used to go on for.
Somehow, you've found a way.
